Quality of transnational higher education: from the perspectiveof student
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This study examines quality assurance mechanisms within Sino-UK collaborative universities, focusing on students in the 2+2 articulation programme. Following China's economic reforms in the late 1970s, transnational higher education (TNHE) emerged as a key model to meet the surging demand for higher education. Using a qualitative research design grounded in Biggs' 3P model and the prospective approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 31 students from Xi'an Jiaotong Liverpool University (XJTLU) and the University of Nottingham Ningbo China (UNNC). The findings reveal both successes and challenges in educational quality, shaped by infrastructure, academic support, and teaching consistency. While students expressed satisfaction with physical facilities and resources, concerns were raised about the impact of expanding enrolment and faculty turnover on teaching quality. The study concludes that quality assurance in TNHE should be dynamic and prioritize student perspectives, addressing discrepancies between expectations and educational experiences. Recommendations are made to improve both internal and external quality assurance mechanisms to ensure sustained educational standards in transnational higher education. Cited as: Ke, G. (2024). Quality of transnational higher education: from the perspective of students. Education and Lifelong Development Research, 1(3), 115-124. https://doi.org/10.46690/elder.2024.03.02 References: Ahmad, S. Z. (2015). Evaluating student satisfaction of quality at international branch campuses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(4), 488-507. Barnett, E. A. (2011). Validation experiences and persistence among community college students. The Review of Higher Education, 34(2), 193-230. Bhandari, R., Belyavina, R., & Gutierrez, R. (2011). Student mobility and the internationalization of higher education: National policies and strategies from six world regions. Institute of International Education. Bhuian, S. N. (2016). Evidences of service quality from an emerging educational hub, Qatar. International Journal of Management in Education, 10(4), 353-369. Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher education, 32(3), 347-364. Biggs, J. (2001). The reflective institution: Assuring and enhancing the quality of teaching and learning. Higher Education, 41(3), 221-238. British Council. (2015). More than 1.5 million graduates from Sino-foreign joint programmes. Retrieved from https://opportunities-insight.britishcouncil.org/news/market-news/more-15-million-graduates-sino-foreign-joint-programmes Dai, K., Matthews, K. E., & Reyes, V. (2019). Chinese students' assessment and learning experiences in a transnational higher education programme. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(1), 70–81. Dai, K., & Garcia, J. (2019). Intercultural learning in transnational articulation programs: The hidden agenda of Chinese students' experiences. Journal of International Students, 9(2), 362-383. Dai, K. (2018). Learning between two systems: A Chinese student’s reflexive narrative in a China-Australia articulation programme. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 50(3), 371-390. Finnie, R., & Usher, A. (2005). Measuring the quality of post-secondary education: Concepts, current practices and a strategic plan. Ottawa, Canadian Policy Research Networks (CPRN). Gibbs, G. (2010). Dimensions of quality. York, The Higher Education Academy. Gibbs, G. (2012). Implications of ‘dimensions of quality’ in a market environment. York, The Higher Education Academy. Healey, N. M. (2015). Towards a risk-based typology for transnational education. Higher Education, 69, 1-18. Heffernan, M., & Pimpa, N. (2019). Globally transformative student experience: Challenges and opportunities in learning and teaching in the transnational business education program. Intercultural Studies in Higher Education: Policy and Practice, 225-253. ICEF Monitor. (2018, July 11). China announces the closure of more than 200 TNE programmes. Johnson, M. H. (2001). Functional brain development in humans. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(7), 475-483. Lai, M., & Jung, J. (2024). Internationalisation with Chinese characteristics: exploring the paradox in students' experiences at Sino-foreign cooperative universities. Studies in Higher Education, 1-14. Liu, S. (2016). External higher education quality assurance system in China. Chinese Education & Society, 49(1-2), 1-6. Liu, D., Wimpenny, K., DeWinter, A., & Harrison, P. (2021). Students’ perceptions and experiences of teaching and learning in transnational higher education in China: implications of the intercultural dialogue framework. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(7), 1465–1483. Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2018). MOE closes 234 Chinese-foreign joint education institutions and programmes. Retrieved from http://en.moe.gov.cn/News/Top_News/201807/t20180710_342467.html Mok, K.H. & Liu, J. (2007). Transnational higher education in Mainland China: from state welfare to marketization and privatization. Social Security Studies, 2, 124-142. Mok, K. H., & Xu, X. (2008). When China opens to the world: A study of transnational higher education in Zhejiang, China. Asia Pacific Education Review, 9, 393-408. Mok, K. H. (2009). Globalisation and higher education restructuring in Hong Kong, Taiwan and Mainland China. London, The Routledge International Handbook of Higher Education. Mok, K. H., & Han, X. (2017). Higher education governance and policy in China: managing decentralization and transnationalism. Policy and Society, 36(1), 34-48. Mohrman, K., Wang, Y., & Li, X. (2011). Quality assurance in undergraduate education: transformation of higher education policy in China. Bradford, Emerald Group Publishing. Nan, N. (2017). The teaching quality evaluation of Sino-foreign cooperative university-based om student satisfaction-Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University case. MPhil Thesis. (in Chinese) Ng, J., & Nyland, B. (2020). Student choice and experience in a joint program at an Australian and a Chinese university. Cham, Springer International Publishing. Nunan, D. (1988). Syllabus design. Oxford, Oxford University Press. O’Mahoney, J. (2014). Enhancing student learning and teacher development in transnational education. York, Higher Education Academy. QAA. (2017). Country Report: The People’s Republic of China. The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.qaa.ac.uk/docs/qaa/international/country-report-china-2017.pdf?sfvrsn=12c9f781_10 State Council of the People’s Republic of China. (2003, March 1). Regulations of the People’s Republic of China on Chinese-Foreign cooperation in running schools. (in Chinese) Sapri, M., Kaka, A., & Finch, E. (2009). Factors that influence student’s level of satisfaction with regards to higher educational facilities services.Malaysian Journal of Real Estate, 4(1), 34-51. Tsiligiris, V., & Hill, C. (2021). A prospective model for aligning educational quality and student experience in international higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 46(2), 228-244. Wilkins, S., Balakrishnan, M.S., & Huisman, J. (2012). Student choice in higher education: Motivations for choosing to study at an international branch campus. Journal of Studies in International Education, 16(5), 413–433. Wilkins, S., & Balakrishnan, M. S. (2013). Assessing student satisfaction in transnational higher education. International Journal of Educational Management, 27(2), 143-156. Wilkins, S., & Juusola, K. (2018). The benefits and drawbacks of transnational higher education: Myths and realities. The Australian Universities' Review, 60(2), 68-76. Xu, C. (2011). The fundamental institutions of China's reforms and development. Journal of economic literature, 49(4), 1076-1151. Zheng, C., & Ouyang, H. (2022). Factors influencing quality of transnational education: Evidence from a Sino-UK MA program. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. Zhong, B. L., Zhou, H. T., & Xia, H. H. (2012). The study of students service quality satisfaction in China-foreign cooperation institutions. China Higher Education Research, 9, 22-26.(in Chinese) Zhang, L. Y. (2021). The emerging problems and challenges faced by Sino-foreign cooperation education: A case study from students’ perspective. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 7(4), 292-295. Zhang, Y., Mok, K. H., Gao, X., & Zhang, Q. (2024). Understanding the Chinese−Foreign cooperation in running schools: from the perspective of loose coupling theory. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 1–20. Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1993). The nature and determinants of customer expectations of service. Journal of the academy of Marketing Science, 21(1), 1-12.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».