BN SO33 - The complex benign multi-disciplinary team meeting - a paradigm shift in decision making for benign oesophagogastric surgery
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Decision making in benign OG pathology can be particularly challenging given the overlap with functional disorders, such as reflux hypersensitivity. A specialist benign oesophagogastric (OG) multidisciplinary team (MDT) may improve our ability to triage potential surgical candidates from those with functional conditions. Unlike in OG cancer, there is a paucity of evidence to support an MDT based approach in benign OG surgery. This study aims to report our experience of introducing a specialist benign OG MDT in an OG tertiary centre in the UK, examining the effect on decision making and an assessment of its acceptability and utility to clinicians. Method A review of consecutive cases discussed in the specialist benign OG MDT since inception in 2022 was undertaken. We reviewed indications, treatment plans and outcomes, any alteration in treatment pathway and final decisions. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a change in management as a result of MDT discussion. Where applicable, results were reported using descriptive statistics. A seven-item electronic questionnaire was also circulated to MDT members (OG surgeons, specialist gastroenterologists, GI radiographers, GI physiologists, and doctors in training), to assess the acceptability and perceived utility of the meetings. Results 74 patient cases were discussed (median age 57.5 (25-79) years). 71/74 (96.0%) of referrals were made by OG surgeons, most commonly to discuss anti-reflux procedures (53/74 (71.6%)). 34/74 (45.9%) patients had undergone previous surgery, most commonly laparoscopic fundoplication. MDT discussion led to a change in management in 43/74 (58.1%) case with recommendations of further investigation (23.0%), further OG clinic review (18.9%) and 21.6% listed for surgery. 12/74 (16.2%) were referred to other specialist services, including clinical psychology. Survey confirmed that all MDT members found their understanding of oesophageal physiology and subsequent decision-making ability in clinic was greatly enhanced. Conclusion Our results show that the complex benign MDT is an effective tool, demonstrating changes to management in over half of cases discussed, including recommending surgery less frequently following specialist review of physiology investigations. Such tests effectively identify functional disorders, such as rumination, highlighting a need for clear onward referral pathways involving specialist psychologists. The meetings have also proven to be valuable learning tools for all attendees of all grades. We strongly believe that adopting an MDT approach to benign OG conditions will enhance collaborative decision making, improve patient outcomes and therefore should be nationally mandated and recommended through AUGIS guidelines.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,010 | 0,028 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».