MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4404455273 · doi:10.25251/skin.8.supp.433

Bimekizumab Long-term Efficacy in Patients with Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis After Switching From Adalimumab, Ustekinumab, or Secukinumab: Results from Up to 4 Years of Total Treatment from BE BRIGHT and BE RADIANT

2024· article· en· W4404455273 sur OpenAlexaff
Georgios Kokolakis, George Han, David M. Pariser, Antonio Costanzo, Richard G. Langley, Rhys Warham, Balint Szilagyi, Bertram Knapp, Mark Lebwohl

Notice bibliographique

RevueSKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineImmunology and Microbiology
ThématiquePsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Établissements canadiensDalhousie University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésUstekinumabSecukinumabMedicinePlaque psoriasisAdalimumabDermatologyPsoriasisInternal medicineTumor necrosis factor alphaPsoriatic arthritis

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

To achieve improvements in psoriasis management, patients and clinicians may choose to switch biologics, particularly in cases of suboptimal response and due to patient preference. 1 • It has been reported previously that, among patients with psoriasis who achieved ≥90% improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) with biologic therapy, approximately one-quarter lost their response at 6 months and half lost response at 18 months.2• Interleukin (IL)-17A and IL-17F have been identified as pivotal drivers of psoriasis and may be differentially regulated; 3 therefore, inhibiting both may offer additional benefits for patients.• Rapid skin clearance after switching to bimekizumab (BKZ) has previously been reported in patients who did not adequately respond to either adalimumab (ADA), ustekinumab (UST), or secukinumab (SEC), and these responses were maintained for up to 80 weeks after switch (2 years' total treatment). 1• Here, we investigate the impact of switching to BKZ on efficacy and health-related quality of life responses, and how they evolve in the long term following switch. ObjectiveTo investigate efficacy and health-related quality of life responses after switch to BKZ from ADA, UST, or SEC through 3 or 4 years of total treatment in the BE RADIANT and BE BRIGHT phase 3/3b studies, respectively. Methods• Included patients from BE BRIGHT were initially randomized to ADA to Week 24 followed by BKZ every 4 weeks (Q4W) to Week 56 (BE SURE), or to UST to Week 52 (BE VIVID), and then entered the BE BRIGHT open-label extension (OLE; 4 years' total treatment) where they received BKZ Q4W or every 8 weeks (Q8W; Figure 1).4-6 • Included patients from BE RADIANT (3 years' total treatment) received SEC to Week 48, followed by BKZ Q4W or Q8W during its OLE (Figure 1).7,8 • Here, PASI 90/PASI 100 and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) 0/1 responses are reported by number of weeks after switch to BKZ, in the long-term, grouped by observed PASI 90 response status at switch (regardless of BKZ dosing regimen).• Patients who discontinued due to lack of efficacy or treatment-related adverse events were considered non-responders at subsequent timepoints; multiple imputation was used for all other missing data (modified non-responder imputation; mNRI).Observed case (OC) data are also reported. Results• Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1.• Of patients randomized to ADA, UST, and SEC at baseline who entered the respective OLEs, 54/129 (41.9%)ADA, 44/132 (33.3%)UST, and 58/314 (18.5%)SEC patients did not achieve PASI 90 at the time of switch to BKZ (Week 24, 52, and 48 respectively; OC).-At the time of switch, 29.6%, 50.0%, and 53.5% of PASI 90 non-responders had DLQI 0/1, respectively (mNRI).• In PASI 90 non-responders, following switch to BKZ, rapid responses were observed and maintained in the long term (mNRI; Figure 2):-Following switch from ADA and after 176 weeks of BKZ, 92.2%, 74.4%, and 81.0%achieved PASI 90, PASI 100, and DLQI 0/1, respectively;-Following switch from UST and after 144 weeks of BKZ, 82.0%, 58.8%, and 76.6% achieved PASI 90, PASI 100, and DLQI 0/1, respectively;-Following switch from SEC and after 96 weeks of BKZ, 71.7%, 39.8%, and 64.5% achieved PASI 90, PASI 100, and DLQI 0/1, respectively.• Switching ADA, UST, and SEC PASI 90 responders to BKZ resulted in maintained PASI 90, PASI 100, and DLQI 0/1 responses through 3 or 4 years of total treatment (Figure 3). ConclusionsSwitching adalimumab, ustekinumab, or secukinumab PASI 90 non-responders to bimekizumab led to rapid achievement and long-term maintenance of clinical responses, through 3 or 4 years of total treatment.In adalimumab, ustekinumab, or secukinumab PASI 90 responders, response rates were maintained in the long term following switch to bimekizumab.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,012

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,236
Écart entre enseignants0,225 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueSKIN The Journal of Cutaneous MedicineMême sujetPsoriasis: Treatment and PathogenesisTravaux en français237 207