Hand-Arm Bimanual Intensive Therapy Including Lower Extremities in Infants With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Importance: Earlier detection of cerebral palsy (CP) and the high neuroplastic potential during the first years of life have motivated a search for early interventions to improve children's long-term motor abilities. Objective: To determine the effectiveness of baby Hand-Arm Bimanual Intensive Therapy Including Lower Extremities (HABIT-ILE) to improve motor function in infants with unilateral CP (UCP). Design, Setting, and Participants: This parallel group, 1:1, randomized clinical trial was conducted between December 1, 2020, and September 9, 2022, in infants recruited through centers specializing in CP treatment and parents' spontaneous applications. Therapy took place in Brussels, Belgium, from March 8, 2021, through June 17, 2022. Infants were matched in pairs by age and lesion type and randomized to either the treatment or control group. Infants were assessed at baseline (T0) and 1 (T1) and 3 months (T2) follow-up. Inclusion criteria were aged 6 to 18 months at T0 (corrected age if preterm birth), a diagnosis or being at risk of UCP, and the ability to comply with the testing and training procedures. Exclusion criteria were uncontrolled seizures, botulinum toxin injections, orthopedic surgery, or specific intensive therapy within 6 months before and until the end of the study. Intervention: Infants in the treatment group received 50 hours of baby HABIT-ILE over 2 weeks, while those in the control group continued their usual motor activities. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was use of the more affected hand as measured using the Mini-Assisting Hand Assessment (Mini-AHA). Secondary outcomes included Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) performance and satisfaction scores, Gross Motor Function Measure-66 (GMFM-66) scores, and other motor and functional outcomes. Between-group comparisons were calculated using repeated-measures analysis of variance (2 groups × 3 assessment times). Effect sizes were reported as partial η squared (ηp2) (small, 0.01; medium, 0.06; large, 0.14). Results: Of the 48 infants entering the study, 46 (mean [SD] age, 13.3 [4.1] months; 27 boys [58%]) were included in the final analyses, with 24 in the treatment group and 22 in the control group. Group × assessment time interactions showed significant improvements that favored the treatment group for the Mini-AHA (mean [SE] difference from T0 to T2, 7.4 [1.4] Mini-AHA units in the treatment group vs 1.9 [1.5] Mini-AHA units in the control group; P = .008; ƞp2 = 0.11) and for both parts of the COPM (mean [SE] difference from T0 to T2, 5.0 [0.4] in the treatment group vs 2.9 [0.4] in the control group; P < .001; ƞp2 = 0.35 for the performance score and 4.4 [0.4] in the treatment group vs 2.1 [0.4] in the control group; P < .001; ƞp2 = 0.33 for the satisfaction score). Although both groups improved in the GMFM-66 (mean [SE] difference from T0 to T2, 6.6% [0.7%] logits in the treatment group vs 5.5% [0.7%] logits in the control group; P < .001; ηp2 = 0.68), there was no significant interaction (P = .43; ηp2 = 0.02). Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial demonstrates the feasibility of delivering 50 hours of HABIT-ILE over a 2-week period in infants with UCP. These findings show that the intervention is effective in improving motor abilities, as revealed by an increase in the use of the more affected hand in bimanual tasks and in enhanced reported functional goal outcomes. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04698395.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».