Anatomic maps of erogenous and aversive sensation zones of the breasts, vulva, and vagina: a questionnaire-based study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Erogenous sensation zones (ESZs) elicit sexual pleasure upon stimulation. General ESZ maps exist, but they do not assess internal areas of the body, differentiate between individual structures, or quantify the importance of individual ESZs to sexual pleasure. Maps of aversive sensation zones (ASZs), or bodily areas individuals dislike having touched during sex, have not been described. AIM: To create detailed erogenous and aversive sensory maps of the vulva, vagina, and breasts, and assess the importance of each erogenous structure to sexual pleasure. METHODS: An anonymous online questionnaire was administered to 441 sexually active cisgender women (mean age 48.9 ± 15.5 years) from March to June 2020 via Qualtrics. Respondents selected ESZs and ASZs from anatomic illustrations and rated each ESZ's importance to their sexual pleasure. Respondents' reasoning for choosing each ASZ was queried. OUTCOMES: Heat maps of ESZ and ASZ selection frequency, ESZ importance ratings, and ASZ reasoning. RESULTS: More respondents selected ≧1 areas of the vulva as erogenous (82.0%), in comparison to the breasts (77.4%) and vagina (59.4%). The two most erogenous areas of the breast were also the most aversive: breast tissue (57.8% ESZ selection; 5.4% ASZ) and nipples (42.7%; 6.5%). Respondents most commonly reported these areas as aversive due to: "It's overly sensitive" and "It hurts."The most frequently selected ESZs of the vulva were the vaginal introitus (50.8%), periurethra (42.6%), and glans clitoris (41.3%). The top ASZs were the anus (34.0%) and perineum (7.9%), with primary reasons being: "It's gross," "It hurts," and "I'm ashamed/embarrassed."Of the five ESZs of the vagina, the superficial anterior (48.1%) and superficial posterior (32.9%) regions were the most selected. The cervix (6.8%), superficial posterior (5%), and deep posterior (3.4%) regions were the top ASZs due to "It hurts" and/or "It's overly sensitive." CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Erogenous and aversive sensory maps could help identify sexual concerns, inform preoperative counseling, and track sensory changes. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: This study captured detailed maps of internal and external ESZs and ASZs of the breasts, vulva, and vagina. Limitations include recall bias and inclusion of only cisgender women, rather than all people who share the same anatomy, irrespective of gender identity. CONCLUSIONS: Erogenous sensation was most prominent in the vulvar structures, including the vaginal introitus and glans clitoris, followed by the superficial surface of the vaginal canal. Aversive sensation associated with the anus primarily came from feelings of judgment and shame, while other ASZs were reportedly due to pain and sensitivity.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».