MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4404540960 · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd014803.pub2

Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation for depression in children and adolescents

2024· review· en· W4404540960 sur OpenAlexaff
Susan C. Campisi, Clare Zasowski, Glyneva Bradley-Ridout, Anett Schumacher, Péter Szatmári, Daphne J. Korczak

Notice bibliographique

RevueCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2024
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineNursing
ThématiqueFatty Acid Research and Health
Établissements canadiensCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthHospital for Sick ChildrenPublic Health OntarioUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDepression (economics)MedicineMajor depressive disorderPlaceboPolyunsaturated fatty acidPsychiatryMental healthInternal medicinePediatricsFatty acidAlternative medicineMood

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Mental health disorders including major depressive disorder (MDD) are well recognized as major contributors to the global burden of disease among adolescents. The prevalence of adolescent depression is estimated to have increased by at least 25% during the COVID-19 pandemic, compounding the already challenging problem of insufficient mental health service and service accessibility that existed prepandemic. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) supplementation is currently recommended as a preventive treatment for depression in high-risk adults as well as a second-line monotherapy for adults with mild to moderate MDD, and adjunctive to antidepressants for adults with moderate to severe MDD. The benefits of omega-3 PUFA intake on depressive illness have been hypothesized to occur as a result of their effect on neurotransmission, maintenance of membrane fluidity, and anti-inflammatory action. A comprehensive synthesis and quantification of the existing evidence on omega-3 PUFA's efficacy in treating depression among children and adolescents is essential for clinicians to provide informed guidance to young people and their families, especially considering the absence of current guidelines for this age group. OBJECTIVES: Primary objective To determine the impact of omega-3 PUFA supplementation versus a comparator (e.g. placebo, wait list controls, no treatment/supplementation, or standard care) on clinician-diagnosed depression or self-reported depression symptoms in children and adolescents. Secondary objectives To estimate the size of the effect of omega-3 PUFAs on depression symptoms. To estimate the effect of each type of omega-3 PUFA (EPA or DHA), compared with placebo, on depression. To determine if the effect is modified by dosage, format (capsule or liquid), sex, or age. To determine compliance and attrition for omega-3 PUFAs as an intervention for depression in children and adolescents. To determine the safety of omega-3 PUFAs as an intervention for depression in children and adolescents. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, three other databases, reference lists of included studies, grey literature, and relevant reviews. The latest search date was 18 May 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving males and females aged 19 years or younger with diagnosed depression comparing omega-3 PUFA supplementation to placebo, wait list control, no treatment/supplementation, or standard care. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were self-reported depression symptoms and clinically diagnosed resolution of depression. Our secondary outcomes were attrition, adverse effects, and compliance with the intervention. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for key outcomes. MAIN RESULTS: We included five trials with 228 participants in our meta-analysis. All trials used a placebo comparator; intervention duration ranged from 10 to 16 weeks (median: 12 weeks). Omega-3 PUFA supplementation compared to placebo may reduce self-reported depression symptoms, but the evidence is very uncertain (standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.85 to 0.17; lower SMD means greater improvement in depression due to omega-3 PUFA; 5 trials, 185 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Omega-3 PUFA supplementation may have little to no effect on remission of depression symptoms compared to placebo, but the evidence is very uncertain (omega-3 PUFA versus placebo: 50% versus 48%; odds ratio [OR] 1.11, 95% CI 0.45 to 2.75; 4 trials, 127 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Omega-3 PUFA supplementation may result in little to no difference in attrition (dropouts) compared to placebo (omega-3 PUFA versus placebo: 18% versus 19%; OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.90; 5 trials, 228 participants; low-certainty evidence). Omega-3 PUFA supplementation may result in little to no difference in adverse effects, with one study reporting more muscle cramps in the fish oil group (13/27 participants) compared to the placebo group (6/29 participants); one study reported more frequent defecation in the omega-3 group (1/29 participants) and one study identified mild skin rash and unusual/manic behavior in the placebo group (2/27 participants). None of the included studies reported serious adverse effects. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Based on five small studies, omega-3 PUFA supplementation may reduce self-reported depression symptoms, but the evidence is very uncertain. Omega-3 PUFA supplementation may have little to no effect on depression remission compared to placebo, but the evidence is very uncertain. Omega-3 PUFA supplementation may result in little to no difference in attrition or adverse effects. The studies observed no serious adverse effects. This review highlights early-stage research on omega-3 PUFA and depression in young people. The evidence on the effects of omega-3 PUFA supplementation in improving self-reported depression symptoms or achieving depression remission in children and adolescents is very uncertain. While no harms are evident, more data are needed to confirm potential risks. Addressing current limitations in the evidence base through the design and conduct of methodologically rigorous studies - larger sample sizes, varied dosages, eicosapentaenoic acid/docosahexaenoic acid ratios, treatment durations, and safety profiles - is crucial to advance our understanding of the role of omega-3 PUFA supplementation for depression in children and adolescents.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Revue systématique · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,007

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,099
Tête enseignante GPT0,436
Écart entre enseignants0,337 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeRevue systématique
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations6
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCochrane Database of Systematic ReviewsMême sujetFatty Acid Research and HealthTravaux en français237 207