MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4404593000 · doi:10.1111/emed.12750

The Fall of a Carolingian Kingdom: Lotharingia, 855–869. By CharlesWest. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 2023. xv + 236 pp. $39.95. ISBN 978 1 487 54516 1.

2024· article· en· W4404593000 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueEarly Medieval Europe · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueMedieval Literature and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésKingdomHistoryGeologyPaleontology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Lothar II came to the throne in 855, after the death of his father Lothar I. To stabilize his rule, he married a woman named Teutberga, from a prominent family in the Middle Kingdom, setting aside his existing partner Waldrada. In the long run, this proved to be a bad idea. Lothar's repeated attempts to divorce Teutberga and receive official sanction for his relationship with Waldrada would bring in his extensive clan of royal relatives, the bishops of multiple kingdoms, and the pope. The richness of the material surrounding Lothar II's divorce case has inspired many a historian, to the point that it might be the single most studied event-complex of the later Carolingian period. Concomitantly, an increasing amount of the source material is available in English translation, an endeavour to which Charles West has already contributed notably with his and Rachel Stone's very welcome translation of Archbishop Hincmar of Rheims's De divortio (published as On the Divorce of King Lothar and Queen Theutberga, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2016). To this, West now adds the current anthology of translated sources concerning Lothar II's divorce and the political world surrounding it. The volume contains twenty-six sources (counting individually the multiple documents translated from the Council of Aachen and summit at Savonnières in 862). These encompass – and please do take the genre classifications here with a pinch of salt – ten letters to various recipients (albeit intended, to various degrees, for public consumption); three synodal records; three royal diplomas, one episcopal charter, and one will; two tracts; a draft speech; an oath; a coronation ordo; and three sources which do not have translated texts, i.e. an entry from the Remiremont Liber memorialis, one of Lothar's coins, and an image from the Sacramentary of Metz. Some of these documents are exceptionally nice to have in English translation. In particular, the 858 round letter from the West Frankish bishops to Louis the German and Emperor Louis II's defence of his imperial title against the Byzantine ruler Basil I are very welcome; and the selection of documents more broadly is well chosen. The quality of the translation is generally high, although there are a few small errors here and there. For instance, in Document 13 (a diploma of Lothar in favour of Teutberga) the final clause of the arenga is missing, translating noverit solertia as ‘let it be brought to the attention of’ strikes me as a little too much of a paraphrase, libera potesta is better rendered as ‘complete power’ than ‘free power’, anulus is translated here as ‘seal’ but in Document 1 as ‘ring’, and the Tyronian notes have been omitted. Sometimes, as well, the translations can read as a bit over-literal. If these seem like nitpicks, that is because they are – notwithstanding minor criticisms such as the above, these are good translations. In particular, in the middle documents and especially Document 12, West works with the somewhat leaden material of earnest Carolingian prose to evoke the stakes of late Carolingian politics in a way which is not merely informative but genuinely exciting. This brings us onto the commentary and analysis. Here, West has finely judged the degree of contextualization needed, and the introductory essays and footnotes carry precisely the right amount of information needed to gain an understanding of a given source without overwhelming the reader with detail. This also allows West to bring in the non- or semi-textual sources mentioned above, a welcome introduction which will allow students in particular to wrestle with the problems surrounding the use of Carolingian numismatic and art historical evidence. The overall thrust of West's presentation pushes in two directions. First, he argues against the opposition of ‘power struggles’ and ‘law and morality’ (e.g. p. 7); and second, he argues that the dissolution of Lothar's kingdom was not simply the contingent result of his premature death from disease in 869, but a result of his and his advisers' mismanagement of a rapidly evolving ideological framework (e.g. pp. 202–3). The first of these is a point well made and well taken, although it does need to be tempered with a little dose of cynicism: in Document 5 and its commentary, we do in fact see the power-political ends dictating the ideological means, as Lothar's court threw out mutually contradictory justifications for the royal actions in the hope that one of them might stick (see pp. 52–3). If I remain unconvinced about the second point, moreover, it is owing to the documents themselves: the 858 letter mentioned earlier (Document 2) is a reminder that while Lothar's situation could have deteriorated like his cousin Pippin II of Aquitaine's had (a comparison West brings up on p. 202), it could have improved just as Charles the Bald's had done between the mid-850s and mid-860s. Equally – and this is also perhaps the main omission from the selection of documents chosen – the idea that Lothar's kingdom died with him in 869 (p. 182) could have used a bit more historiographical salt, being as it is a point where debate has not settled. Uses of ‘Lotharingian-ness’ were neither consistent nor uncontested, but they do keep cropping up into the tenth century and even beyond. Discussion of the politics of representation underpinning something like the 909 diploma of Louis the Child that refers to ‘the magnates of the Lotharingian realm’ (proceres regni Lothariensis) as a coherent political action group would have been a satisfying cap to the work (Die Urkunden Zwentibolds und Ludwig des Kindes, ed. T. Schieffer, MGH diplomata regum Germaniae ex stirpe Karolinorum 4 (Berlin, 1960), no. 70, p. 206). The Fall of a Carolingian Kingdom is to be thoroughly applauded. It is a well thought-out and well-translated selection of important texts, which convey to the reader the drama of the multipolar Carolingian world of the late ninth century. It will find a fixed place on historians' bookshelves and rightfully earn West the gratitude of students and researchers alike.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,562
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,211
Écart entre enseignants0,193 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle