MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4404730230 · doi:10.1111/cobi.14385

Queer Black voices in conservation

2024· article· en· W4404730230 sur OpenAlexaff
Alex C. Moore, Kendall L. Calhoun, Christine E. Wilkinson, Elan Alford, Alycia Ellington, Cesar O. Estien, Gabriela Fleury, Nepsis García, Akiebia S. Hicks, Camille Mosley, Neshima Vitale‐Penniman

Notice bibliographique

RevueConservation Biology · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesSociety for Conservation BiologyUniversity of Notre DameUniversity of CaliforniaNational Science Foundation
Mots-clésQueerConservation scienceGeographyEcologyBiologySociologyBiodiversityGender studies

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The foundation of Western conservation is underpinned by 2 core doctrines: the Doctrine of Discovery and Manifest Destiny. Briefly, the Doctrine of Discovery was a directive by the Catholic Church in the 1450s to European explorers that lands and waters claimed by colonial states were “discovered” by them and thus could not be claimed by any non-Christian inhabitants (Miller, 2011). Similarly, Manifest Destiny is the ideology that European immigrants were destined to lands in North America and were chosen for the task of settling it (Miller, 2011). Essential to these beliefs was the assertion that nature and people were distinct: nature (and those living within it) was something to be tamed and controlled, whereas “civilized” (White) people were meant to control and enjoy it. Collectively, these beliefs, along with several legal precedents, including the 1823 Johnson v McIntosh court case and the Indian Removal Act of 1830, excluded formerly enslaved Africans from access to lands promised to them and enabled the violent removal of Indigenous peoples from their land. This history facilitated the creation of several present-day conservation structures, namely national parks, wildlife management areas, and the fallacy of pristine, untouched lands (Cronon, 1996; Kantor, 2007). As these legacies of harm are increasingly acknowledged and repudiated (e.g., the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Vatican officially renounced the Doctrine of Discovery in 2021 and 2023, respectively), there is an attendant need to recognize and uplift the diverse voices of those who have contributed to conservation but have been excluded from public recognition and discourse. Across various Western conservation narratives, historical figures frequently cited for their disproportionate influence on the movement include John Muir, Aldo Leopold, Theodore Roosevelt, William Hornaday, Gifford Pinchot, and Rachel Carson (Kantor, 2007; Millstein, 2018; Murdock, 2021; Nesheim, 2012). The ubiquity of these names in the current conservation lexicon has played a significant role in shaping perceptions of who has contributed to the field (Taylor, 2016). However, often missing from this long-repeated historical narrative is an interrogation of how modern conservation came to be and an acknowledgment of the numerous other individuals with enduring legacies whose names, faces, and narratives have been obscured by history (however, see Ban et al., 2018; Chaudhury & Colla, 2021; Duc Bo Massey et al., 2021). In this piece, we aim to center queer Black conservation scientists, researchers, activists, land stewards, and practitioners (hereafter conservationists). Toward this end, we share personal narratives of experiences engaging in conservation, amplify the work of various individuals and organizations, and honor the many voices that could not be included in this piece. We purposefully chose to highlight queer Black perspectives (identities held by many of the authors of this piece) because queerness and Blackness have always been intrinsically linked to nature, advocacy, and community (Anderson & Samudzi, 2018; Estien, 2023). These connections and legacies of environmental stewardship uniquely position queer Black people in the conservation field and strongly inform how they engage in this work (i.e., in opposition to dominant societal structures, including capitalism and anthropocentrism). Although we recognize the impossibility of capturing the full range of contributions and perspectives here, we view this piece as the beginning of a conversation and invite others to join us in revising the narratives around how and by whom conservation is done. Queer Black communities contain multitudes of diversity, including diversity of thought, experiences, culture, and expression. At the same time, many of the contributions queer Black people have made to conservation have common ideological threads. Although colonial paradigms of conservation often separate the world into distinct components (e.g., human vs. nature), queer and Black ecologies encourage a more holistic view rooted in ancestry and a recognition of the intertwined struggles for well-being between our communities and the natural environment (Wilkinson, 2023). Queer and Black ecologies thus provide unique opportunities to engage in natural spaces as a means to reconnect with nature and ones-self (Catalano et al., 2019; Jenkins et al., 2015; Morton, 2010). Personal narratives and anecdotes highlighted in Table 1 exemplify some of these experiences and connections. Expectations of conformity we have often experienced in our daily lives are noticeably absent in nature (Gómez et al., 2023; McLaughlin et al., 2023; Monk et al., 2019), enabling us to embrace our full identities in spaces that are unregulated by hegemonic social or political structures. Further, nature allows us to find kinship and liberation and to develop empathetic connections to certain species or features of the natural world that are often misunderstood or persecuted by others (Estien, 2023; Wilkinson, 2023). We can also gain a deeper understanding of ourselves in our studies of nature by finding mirrors of our own character in research subjects, allowing us to further recognize our power and potential (Estien, 2023). Despite the comfort and connection afforded by time spent in natural spaces, intersectional identities can also present challenges to joining the conservation field. Structural barriers to accessing nature have long been documented in Black communities (Finney, 2014; Rigolon & Nemeth, 2021) and can result in the notable absence of Black people from these environments. Access to green space is therefore often considered a privilege, and even when we occupy this space, we are regularly monitored and interrogated for our presence (e.g., Herreria, 2018; Levin, 2015; Margaritoff, 2022). Additionally, because the outdoors is a space many of our enslaved ancestors labored to escape, we often experience strong internal and cultural barriers that limit our exposure to nature. Even for those actively looking to participate in conservation, significant consideration goes into determining where queer Black individuals are willing to go due to personal safety concerns. Such considerations inherently limit where we can be and how we can or cannot express our identities (Demery & Pipkin, 2020). Our experiences shape the way we are collectively able or unable to engage in conservation. However, these commonalities serve as powerful connective tissue in creating a community that can be used to uplift and empower us to persist in our justice-centered conservation work. Several North America-based initiatives and organizations led by queer Black individuals have done considerable work to steward land with approaches informed by ancestral knowledge, amplify the voices of marginalized identities in conservation, and educate and empower communities. Although these contributions have been systematically underreported, we highlight recent efforts to expand the visibility of queer Black conservationists (Table 2 contains a summary of select organizations). Each of the contemporary programs described below builds on the work and sacrifices of those who came before, including Marsha P. Johnson (her role in the Stonewall Riots set the stage for decades of critical activism to follow), Audre Lorde (often cited for her influence on the feminist movement, Lorde also wrote about the intersection of environmental issues and social justice), and Bayard Rustin (a key figure in the Civil Rights Movement; his commitment to understanding the intersectionality of social issues still informs environmental movements today). POC in Wildlife Ecology https://tinyurl.com/POCinWildlifeEcology Rootsprings Coop https://www.rootspringsmn.org/ Urban Creators https://www.urbancreators.org Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Hilltop Urban Gardens https://www.hilltopurbangardens.org Soul Fire Farm (https://www.soulfirefarm.org/) is an Afro-Indigenous community farm in upstate New York committed to uprooting racism and seeding sovereignty in the food system through regenerative agriculture, education, and national organizing. Supported by Neshima Vitale-Penniman, a queer multiracial Black–Taino–Jewish Ifa practitioner, Soul Fire Farm offers food sovereignty programs, including farmer training for Black and Brown growers, reparations and land return initiatives for northeastern farmers, and food justice workshops for urban youth. Similarly, the Shelterwood Collective (https://www.shelterwoodcollective.org/), cocreated by Niko Alexandre and Layel Camargo, is a 365-ha community forest and collective led by Indigenous, Black, and queer individuals on the unceded Southern Pomo and Kashia territory in Northern California. Shelterwood engages in active forest restoration and wildfire risk reduction, community and cultural organizing, and the development of a community retreat center to heal interconnected ecosystems. Zoboomafoolish (https://www.zoboomafoolish.com/), created by Jaylen Bastos and based in British Columbia, and The Mycelium Youth Network (https://www.myceliumyouthnetwork.org/), founded by Lil Milagro Henriquez and based in Oakland, California, offer workshops and courses in environmental education geared toward bringing Black, Indigenous, people of color, and queer people into environmental spaces. Such programs, including those focusing on climate resilience and urban stream restoration, are vital for increasing scientific literacy and local engagement for marginalized and underserved communities on environmental issues that directly affect them. Across various virtual platforms, Black-led groups have organized advocacy events to highlight the specific contributions of Black scientists in multiple disciplines, with many, such as Black in Environment (https://www.blackinenviron.org/) and Black Mammalogists Week (https://www.blackmammalogists.com), holding space for intersectionality and amplifying queer Black voices (National Geographic, 2021). In addition, several new media projects showcase the experiences of queer Black people in nature and queerness in nature more broadly, including Christian Cooper's new show, “Extraordinary Birder with Christian Cooper” (Moynihan, 2022), and Christine Wilkinson's video series, “Queer is Natural” (National Geographic, 2023). These efforts affirm Black and queer belonging and excellence in the conservation field and provide powerful examples that these identities can thrive in the discipline. By engaging communities in local conservation efforts, highlighting leaders in the field, and striving to advocate for environmental justice for queer and Black people, these programs empower those often excluded from environmental discourse and decision-making processes that directly affect them. In doing so, they provide marginalized communities with the tools required to protect their futures and emphasize the value of inclusive, justice-oriented environmental practices. We outlined the experiences and perspectives of many queer Black conservationists, but it is important to acknowledge that the voices represented are limited. Queer Black people face considerably higher risks of discrimination than those who solely identify as queer (Whitfield et al., 2014), meaning the full intersectional identities of many current and aspiring queer Black conservationists may not be known because of safety concerns. There are likely many who live or work in circumstances and jurisdictions where queerness is illicit or illegal, making it unsafe or difficult to identify openly. For instance, although there are numerous conservation initiatives across Africa (where several of us work), homosexuality is outlawed in 34 African nations as of 2016 (Carroll & Mendos, 2016), and there have been very few positive changes in such laws among these nations since. Even within countries where same-sex partnerships are legal, local stigmas and discrimination prevent people from identifying openly as queer. Additionally, prior generations of queer Black conservationists may not have had opportunities to express their entire selves safely and openly. Thus, although their intersectional identities likely influenced their contributions to conservation, the ways in which intersectionality informed their approaches remain underappreciated. It is therefore crucial that the contributions of these queer Black conservationists be acknowledged, not only to credit their efforts, but also to hold space for their hidden identities. Conservation is practiced in a world that is not uniformly safe for everyone, so we take this moment to honor those who shrink themselves to protect the world around them as well as themselves. Despite the colonial and White-supremacist legacies foundational to Western conservation, queer Black people have been integral to this field. Although queer Black conservationists have diverse perspectives, there are commonalities in the barriers we face in entering and maintaining a presence in the conservation field, as well as in the ways that we harness our own positionality when conducting conservation work. Intersectional viewpoints, like those of queer Black communities, challenge dominant structures, such as capitalism and anthropocentrism (Maina-Okori et al., 2017), potentially allowing for more creative and just solutions to environmental problems. Indeed, although intersectionality creates opportunity for compounded discrimination, it can also be harnessed as a connecting strength. Bringing together intersectional conservation actors can enhance innovation and build coalitions across geographies and circumstances and therefore leverage an increased capacity to address complex environmental challenges (see Di Chiro, 2020). By highlighting and cultivating spaces for those with queer Black identities in conservation, we aim to promote intersectional frameworks that encourage us to look inward at our positionalities in this field and outward at the ways in which all members of the discipline can dismantle barriers to access and engagement (Lloro-Bidart & Finewood, 2018). To meet the interconnected needs of both people and nature, conservation spaces must be made safer, more inclusive, and affirming of the unique contributions of marginalized communities. Only through these crucial disciplinary changes can we create conservation spaces that are safe enough to bring our full selves into and strong enough to meet the varied environmental challenges of today. We extend immense gratitude to the remarkable individuals who shared their personal narratives and stories for this piece, including A. Ajani, S. Austin, and K. Toney. Further, we express our sincere appreciation to those who dedicated their time and effort to provide invaluable feedback and edits. Their keen insights and thoughtful suggestions were instrumental in refining this manuscript. Finally, this piece is dedicated to our queer Black ancestors and chosen families; our voices, courage, strength, and ability to change the world come from you.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,647
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,237
Écart entre enseignants0,222 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueConservation BiologyMême sujetAmerican Environmental and Regional HistoryTravaux en français237 207