Electrical Muscle Stimulation for the Conservative Management of Female Pelvic Floor Muscle Dysfunction: A Scoping Review
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) is a conservative management tool for the treatment of pelvic floor dysfunctions (PFDs). The aim of this review was to scope, summarize and critically evaluate available research investigating the impact of various modes of EMS on PFDs in females. Methods: Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews was used with The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. Three databases were searched. Articles published in English that included female participants living with pelvic floor muscle dysfunction where EMS was used as a conservation care intervention were included in the review. Included studies were analyzed following Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for randomized trials was used to assess risk of bias for the randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and Hawker and Payne’s quality appraisal criteria was used to appraise the data from the other included papers systematically. Results: A total of 37 studies, including 20 RCTs were included. A favorable impact, across various outcomes, was found across trials which investigated different types of EMS with varying protocols. The heterogenous nature of intervention protocols limited the ability to apply any statistical or meta-analyses. EMS demonstrates a positive effect for improving outcomes related to PFDs in adult women. Included studies support the use of EMS for stress, urgency and mixed urinary incontinence. All versions of EMS studied were found to provide significant improvements, which included them being used as a sole intervention or as an adjunct intervention. High intensity forms of EMS were consistently found to require shorter intervention times. Conclusions: EMS demonstrates improvement across outcomes for PFDs among adult women. In particular, the results of this review suggest that EMS may be particularly useful in women living with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) or who those are unable to perform voluntary muscle contractions when pelvic floor muscle training is attempted. Further research related to more novel versions of high intensity EMS approaches is needed.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».