Safety and Efficacy of Deucravacitinib in Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis for Up to 3 Years
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Importance: Safe and effective long-term treatments for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis are needed. Objective: To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of deucravacitinib through 3 years (week 148) in the randomized POETYK PSO-1, PSO-2, and nonrandomized long-term extension (LTE) trials. Design, Setting, and Participants: PSO-1/PSO-2 were global, 52-week, randomized, double-blinded phase 3 trials in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. After completing 52 weeks of treatment in PSO-1/PSO-2, patients could enroll in the prespecified, ongoing, nonrandomized LTE trial. The peak of the global COVID-19 pandemic coincided with the LTE trial. Patient enrollment in the LTE started August 12, 2019; safety and efficacy were assessed through June 15, 2022; and these data were analyzed through June 28, 2024. Interventions: The PSO-1/PSO-2 trials randomized patients 1:2:1 to oral placebo, deucravacitinib, 6 mg once daily, or apremilast, 30 mg twice daily. Patients enrolling in the LTE trial received open-label deucravacitinib, 6 mg once daily. Main Outcomes And Measures: Safety outcomes were evaluated in patients who received 1 or more doses of deucravacitinib. Efficacy outcomes included 75% or greater or 90% or greater reduction from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75/90) and static Physician Global Assessment scores of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) (sPGA 0/1) and were assessed in patients who received deucravacitinib treatment from day 1 of the parent trials who continued in the LTE trial. Results: Of 1519 patients who received 1 or more doses of deucravacitinib, 513 received continuous deucravacitinib treatment from day 1 and entered the LTE trial. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs) per 100 person-years were decreased or similar in the 1-year vs 3-year cumulative periods, respectively, for adverse events (AEs) (229.2 vs 144.8; 95% CI, 215.4-243.9 vs 137.1-153.0), serious AEs (5.7 vs 5.5; 95% CI, 4.4-7.4 vs 4.7-6.4), discontinuations due to AEs (4.4 vs 2.4; 95% CI, 3.3-5.9 vs 2.0-3.0), and deaths (0.2 vs 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1-0.8 vs 0.2-0.6). Incidence rates of the most common AEs (EAIR per 100 person-years ≥5) during the 1-year and 3-year cumulative periods, respectively, were nasopharyngitis (26.1 vs 11.4; 95% CI, 23.0-29.8 vs 10.2-12.7), COVID-19 (0.5 vs 8.0; 95% CI, 0.2-1.2 vs 7.1-9.1), and upper respiratory tract infection (13.4 vs 6.2; 95% CI, 11.3-16.0 vs 5.4-7.2). EAIRs for AEs of interest, including herpes zoster, major adverse cardiovascular events, and malignant diseases, remained low and were decreased or comparable between the 1-year and 3-year cumulative periods. Clinical response rates were maintained through 3 years. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this integrated analysis of the phase 3 POETYK PSO-1, PSO-2, and nonrandomized LTE trials demonstrate a consistent safety profile and durable clinical response of continuous treatment with deucravacitinib through 3 years of treatment in patients with psoriasis. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT03624127, NCT03611751, and NCT04036435.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».