A portrait of primary care use in community dwelling persons with dementia in Quebec between 2018 and 2020
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Context As the population ages, access and continuity of primary care with the family physician are crucial for managing the complex health needs of persons with dementia. However, there is still a gap in understanding who has access to primary care and who maintains continuity of care. Objective To provide a comprehensive overview of primary care use among community-dwelling persons with dementia in Quebec from 2018 to 2020. Specifically, this study aims to identify the proportion and characteristics of individuals with dementia who had no primary care visits and those who had at least one visit with a family physician within a year and to describe the characteristics of persons with dementia who experienced low continuity of care during the same period. Study Design and Analysis This is a retrospective cohort study of persons using Quebec’s health administrative data. Population Studied Community-dwelling persons aged 65 and older with a prevalent diagnosis of dementia on March 1st of 2018, 2019, and 2020. Measures Age, sex, time since the dementia diagnosis, comorbidity, mortality, use of home care, social and material deprivation, racialization, and rurality were included. Continuity of primary care was measured using the Bice-Boxerman index on March 1st for those who had at least two visits. Results On March 1st of 2018, 2019, and 2020, Quebec saw 66,295, 67,995, and 69,665 community-dwelling individuals aged 65 and older with a diagnosis of dementia, respectively. 60.8%, 60.2%, and 58.8% of the individuals in 2018, 2019, and 2020, respectively, had more than one visit to a family physician. Around 30% of these individuals had low continuity of care each year. Those with low continuity of care tended to have a higher average number of visits. A higher proportion of individuals with low continuity of care received their visits in public funded and tended to live in the rural area, highlighting an interesting demographic divide. Conclusion This study presents a portrait of primary care use among community-dwelling persons with dementia in Quebec. Certain characteristics stand out among those who do not use primary care and have low continuity of care. Despite the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of visits and the continuity of care were maintained. Further research is needed to understand factors influencing care continuity and its impact on the health of individuals with dementia over time.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».