A comprehensive experience-based framework of actionable priorities to enhance Canada’s health and social care system: discussions with older persons, clinicians, managers, and decision-makers using nominal group technique
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Existing frameworks of older persons' experiences in health and social care systems are usually based on single stakeholder perspectives and focused on limited aspects that are independent from one another. This study aimed to describe such experiences from the perspective of diverse stakeholders and develop a comprehensive experience-based framework for actionable priorities to enhance Canada's health and social care system. METHODS: We adapted a nominal group technique with a qualitative approach. We formed four groups of stakeholders (4 older persons, 7 clinicians, 5 managers, 4 decision-makers) in the province of Quebec. First, participants individually completed a questionnaire to rank the six domains of an international set of metrics of quality of care for older persons in terms of their importance. Then, we conducted a remote discussion with each stakeholder group, obtained consensus on the priority domains, and explored personal/professional experiences explaining prioritization processes and what changes are needed. An inductive-deductive thematic analysis was conducted to develop a framework for actionable health and social care priorities. RESULTS: The framework included six key categories revolving around a core category of 'health equity'. (1) 'Access to services and care' focused on improved accessibility of healthcare navigators, primary and home care services, and end-of life care. (2) 'Respect for older persons' involved individuality and uniqueness, daily needs, advocacy in defence of vulnerability, and decision-making valuing care preferences. (3) 'Involvement of family and friends' encompassed formal recognition, responsibilities, and trajectories associated with caregiving. (4) 'Communication and education' consisted of adaptive communication between older persons, caregivers, and professionals and societal-level education and awareness-raising. (5) 'Coordination and integration of care' comprised health and social services organization, cross-sectoral approaches, and interdisciplinary collaboration. (6) 'Responsiveness to evolving needs' of older persons involved timely response to health transitions and promoting holistic approaches. CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrates the complex challenges of caring for older persons. The framework suggests several areas for improvement in care practices and policies for older persons and caregivers. Proposed intervention targets include public healthcare system navigators, standardized goals of care practices respecting persons' wishes, formal recognition of caregiver contributions, society-level education, cross-sectoral initiatives, and holistic approaches.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».