Analysis of Concussions with Persisting Symptoms Caused by Motor Vehicle Crashes in 136 Vehicle Occupants Shows that Females Are Vulnerable Road Users
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
At the Canadian Concussion Centre, we treated 136 patients from 2000 to 2020 who sustained concussion plus persisting concussion symptoms (C+PCS) as motor vehicle occupants involved in motor vehicle crashes (MVCs). This center specializes in the treatment of patients with C+PCS. The objective of the present study was to identify strategies for preventing concussion among vehicle occupants involved in MVC. Indeed, this is the first study focused on C+PCS in MVC occupants, and our main purpose was to evaluate the effectiveness of onboard concussion prevention strategies. In this retrospective, consecutive cohort of 136 patients with C+PCS, we examined the patients' demographic and injury features in relation to the nature of the MVC including speed, direction of impact, and availability, deployment, and effectiveness of onboard occupant safety measures including seatbelts, head restraints, and airbags. The most frequent combination of factors was a belted female driver of an automobile struck from behind by another automobile. Surprisingly, the entire patient cohort comprised more females (69.1%) than males (30.9%), and rear-end collision was the most common type in females. Most injured occupants of both sexes were wearing seatbelts, but only a minority of the crashes caused airbag deployment. The seven most common symptoms were headache (84.6%), anxiety (72.8%), sensitivity to light (70.6%), memory problems (69.9%), sensitivity to noise (66.2%), irritability (56.6%), and depression (55.9%). Whiplash was a frequent associated injury in both sexes. Complete recovery from C+PCS was rare, and most patients with known follow-up continued to suffer from persisting symptoms for months to years. The median symptom duration for all 136 patients was 30.0 months (interquartile range: 16.8-56.0 months). Based on these findings, we conclude that females are indeed vulnerable road users with respect to C+PCS, and our literature search showed that there had been some previous evidence of increased injury risk of other injuries in female occupants. We recommend that additional prevention strategies are required to reduce the post-crash acceleration-deceleration "bobble-head" movement of the head on trunk causing both concussion and whiplash as has been accomplished in auto racing. Also, these prevention measures must be investigated in crash studies that include low-to-high speed rear-end collisions using anthropometrically appropriate models of male and female occupants reflecting the range of sizes of both sexes. There is a need for more concussion brain injury prevention research focusing on the vulnerability of female occupants, which has not been sufficiently addressed even though the deficiency was identified many years ago. The sex inequity of current onboard motor vehicle concussion brain injury prevention measures especially with respect to females should be addressed by governments and the automobile and insurance industries.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».