Leveraging AI for enhanced alignment of national biodiversity targets with the global biodiversity goals
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
• Environmental Concerns: Our research showcases AI's potential to enhance the alignment between national and global biodiversity targets. By facilitating the identification of areas needing improvement, such as biosafety and gender equality, we identify a pathway for more effective conservation efforts and policy revisions to achieve global biodiversity goals. • Economic Concerns: The AI-driven analysis identifies gaps in integrating biodiversity considerations within the business sector as well as pinpoints areas of lesser alignment, which aids in formulating a targeted strategy for resource allocation to support a more impactful contribution towards global biodiversity objectives. • Social Concerns: By pinpointing underrepresented areas such as gender equality and indigenous peoples' rights, our research advocates for NBSAP revisions to be both inclusive and comprehensive. This ensures that biodiversity conservation efforts are equitable, supporting societal well-being and sustainable development by integrating diverse voices and knowledge systems. This research explores the innovative application of artificial intelligence (AI), specifically OpenAI's GPT-3.5 model, in assessing the alignment between National Biodiversity Targets (NBTs) and the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF). Addressing biodiversity loss requires aligning national efforts with global objectives, a complex task due to the vast amount of biodiversity data and the diversity of biodiversity strategies across countries. By leveraging AI, this study introduces a scalable, efficient method to evaluate the congruence between 599 NBTs from 26 countries and the GBF goals and targets. Our methodology combines traditional natural language processing techniques with large language model insights utilizing GPT-3.5 to examine the similarity between national and global biodiversity targets and identify recommendations to enhance target alignment. The study achieves two main objectives: 1) providing actionable insights for countries to accelerate alignment with the GBF through their National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAP) Target Similarity Assessments, and 2) mapping the global landscape of biodiversity policy alignment to inform strategic planning for the 16th Biodiversity Conference of Parties (COP16). The analysis reveals strong alignment with GBF Goals A and B, as well as Targets 4, 10, and 14, while highlighting areas for improvement in gender equality, biosafety, and business sector engagement. This research demonstrates AI's capacity to streamline biodiversity policy alignment, offering specific guidance for nations to refine their biodiversity strategies. The study underscores the importance of human-centered, transparent AI applications in supporting global biodiversity goals, advocating for collaborative, multi-sectoral efforts to enhance policy coherence and achieve the ambitious objectives of the GBF.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle