Primary sclerosing cholangitis–inflammatory bowel disease: Epidemiology, mortality, and impact of diagnostic sequence
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background & Aims: Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) carries significant morbidity and mortality compared with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We characterized epidemiology trends and outcomes in those with PSC-IBD and IBD, paying particular attention to the impact of PSC-IBD diagnostic sequence on outcomes. Methods: Incidence and prevalence of PSC-IBD and IBD (2002-2018) were evaluated using validated health administrative data-derived cohorts from Ontario, Canada (population ∼15 million). Transplant and death outcomes were assessed, with PSC-IBD diagnostic sequence as the exposure of interest. Results: Incidence of PSC-IBD and IBD was 0.46 and 24.6/100,000 person-years (PYs) respectively, whereas prevalence was 5.53 and 588/100,000 PY respectively. Incidence/prevalence of PSC-IBD increased over time, unlike for IBD. Age at IBD diagnosis was earlier among those with PSC-IBD compared with those with IBD alone. Higher socioeconomic status associated with high PSC-IBD incidence rates and fastest incidence rise. Those diagnosed with IBD before PSC had higher risk of transplant/death compared with PSC before IBD (hazard ratio [HR] 1.34, 95% CI 1.02-1.75), driven by an increased risk of death (HR 2.73, 95% CI 1.68-4.45). PSC-IBD had a 4.5-fold greater risk of transplant/death compared with IBD alone. Liver-related and luminal gastrointestinal disease, particularly hepatopancreatobiliary malignancy, were predominant causes of death among those with PSC-IBD, while cardiovascular and respiratory diseases were predominant among those with IBD. Conclusions: Population-level data support distinct epidemiological patterns among people living with PSC-IBD compared with IBD, including a higher socioeconomic status and worse outcomes in those found to have IBD before PSC. Impact and implications: Individuals with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) face increased morbidity and mortality compared with the general population and those with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); yet, most individuals with PSC are found to have concomitant IBD during their lifetime. This study describes the distinctive epidemiological differences and mortality trends at the population level between PSC-IBD and IBD. While PSC-IBD remains a rare condition, diagnoses are on the rise (particularly among higher socioeconomic status populations), with most patients being diagnosed with IBD before PSC; this group also experienced higher mortality post-PSC diagnosis compared with those diagnosed with PSC first, with a large proportion of deaths caused by liver- and gut-related causes. Practical applications of these findings include further studies to evaluate whether earlier identification of PSC-IBD affects disease outcomes, as well as educating patients, clinicians, and policymakers on the importance of recognizing PSC-IBD as a distinct entity from IBD alone.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».