MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4404913025 · doi:10.5325/hungarianstud.51.2.0201

Marc Roscoe Loustau. <i>Hungarian Catholic Intellectuals in Contemporary Romania: Reforming Apostles</i>

2024· article· en· W4404913025 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

venuePublié dans une revue dont le pays d'attache est le Canada.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueHungarian Studies Review · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueHistorical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésApostlesPolitical scienceClassicsAncient historyEconomic historyHistoryArtLiterature

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Marc Loustau’s Hungarian Catholic Intellectuals in Contemporary Romania constitutes an ethnographic study of generations of Hungarian-speaking theologians in Transylvania and their educational reform initiatives. The book’s array of interconnected stories and observations are grounded in the author’s decade of anthropological fieldwork and the biographies and activities of Hungarian-speaking Catholic theologians and educators from the region’s culturally and politically transformative interwar period. Premised on the idea that “theologians ought to be understood and studied as intellectuals” (2), Loustau pursues the idea that contemporary theologians are not just influential educators but also shapers of national public culture. The book’s episodic investigation takes place primarily in eastern Transylvania, in an area known as the Szeklerland, specifically in the Ciuc Valley (in this respect, the book’s title can be a bit misleading). Inhabited primarily by Hungarian-speaking Roman Catholics, it is a region that has long been at the confluence of identitarian and religious polemics, which took on acute if also overlapping nationalist dimensions after Transylvania was joined to Romania in 1919 as a result of the Treaty of Trianon.Lustau’s fieldwork, undertaken during multiple stints between 2009 and 2018, includes participant-observation in parish choirs, prayer groups, orphanages, dormitories, and shrines across eastern Transylvania, to list but a handful of locales and social settings. Throughout the book, the echoes of history reverberate back and forth through the socialist, postsocialist, and contemporary consumerist eras. The fieldwork and research are impressive, and the writing is truly engaging; often, the reader feels as if they are on a journey with Loustau: from an untested graduate student, having just landed in the region and toiling over Hungarian-language learning, to the moral and life lessons learned along the way, ending with a sophisticated and carefully considered critique of his discipline.The book unfolds across eight chapters, which in many respects can be read as stand-alone pieces. The introduction is weighty but lays out a clear path for the tasks and ideas that follow; the epilogue that comprises chapter 8, “Witnessing the Rosary’s Voice,” contemplates the Catholic tradition of praying the rosary and its impact on the author’s approach to conducting research in a community where petitionary prayer and evangelism intertwine as forms of meditation. Focusing on various groups of Catholic theologians and educators, Loustau concentrates on the substance of ideas held by Transylvanian Hungarian intellectuals. Notably, the author interrogates their conceptions of “ethnic minority selfhood” (and self-creation) as well as “collaborative presence,” both through human and divine activities, and within the power dynamics of defined social and group boundaries (3). Whether through contemporary figures such as Brother Csaba Böjte, a peripatetic priest and pedagogue who rescues homeless orphans and leads the Saint Francis Foundation, or interwar-era activists such as priest Áron Márton, sociologist József Venczel, or educator Pál Péter Domokos, Loustau charts how these Transylvanian Hungarian intellectuals wielded and wield their communal work under the watchful gaze of what he terms “Hungarians from Hungary.” Elsewhere, Loustau explores the impact of a resurgent, right-wing Hungarian populism and nationalism on today’s religious and educational activities of Transylvanian intellectuals.Hungarian Catholic Intellectuals in Contemporary Romania is, foremost, a work of anthropology, replete with heavy doses of theory, conceptual frameworks, and scholarly engagement. For nonexperts interested in the broader strokes of the history and contemporary society of Hungarian Catholics in Transylvania, this might distract from an otherwise compelling narrative. Nevertheless, the book will be of interest to scholars and advanced graduate students in adjacent disciplines, including the history of religion as well as nationalism and area studies, as the research and storylines are at the intersection of these and other fields. The book has a very nice selection of images yet no maps, which might have been useful to readers unfamiliar with the geography and history of the region under investigation.Within this ethnographical foray into the last century of Hungarian-minority religious life in eastern Transylvania, Loustau ultimately takes to task the anthropology of Christianity, which he argues has too often defaulted to the frameworks of nationalism studies and other disciplines in the social sciences that attempt to analyze Christian populist nationalism. As such, he argues, scholars in the latter fields have dictated the research parameters in debates over the definitions of Christianity, populism, and nationalism. This book, in many ways, seeks to redress the field’s major disciplinary shortcomings, albeit in this nook of Eastern Europe, charting a new path toward understanding theology and Christianity in practice.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,885
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,112
Tête enseignante GPT0,391
Écart entre enseignants0,279 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle