MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4404950885 · doi:10.21125/iceri.2024.0989

PERCEPTIONS AND EXPECTATIONS OF AFRICAN HIGHER EDUCATION STUDENTS ABOUT BIOECONOMY

2024· article· en· W4404950885 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

fundUn bailleur canadien est enregistré sur le travail.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueICERI proceedings · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueEntrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesMunster Technological UniversityUniversitetet i AgderMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino SuperiorUniversidad de la República UruguayUniversidade Nova de LisboaMittuniversitetetRyukoku UniversityEötvös Loránd TudományegyetemPolitechnika BialostockaInstituto Mexicano del Seguro SocialUniversity of Colorado Colorado SpringsPurdue UniversityUniversity College DublinCardiff UniversityAuckland University of Technology, New ZealandUniversity of LeedsRoyal Academy of EngineeringUniversity of LethbridgeDoğu Akdeniz ÜniversitesiIndiana State UniversityIdaho State UniversityCardiff Metropolitan UniversityUniversity of HullCork Institute of TechnologyVirginia Commonwealth UniversityTartu ÜlikoolMississippi State UniversityNorges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige UniversitetUlster UniversitySunway UniversityUniversity of MemphisUniversidade de LisboaKansainvälisen Liikkuvuuden ja Yhteistyön KeskusNanyang Technological UniversityTechnische Universität DortmundOklahoma State UniversityFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaUtah State UniversityEast Carolina UniversityInstituto Politécnico NacionalUniversidad PanamericanaUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresDrexel University
Mots-clésPerceptionComputer scienceKnowledge managementMathematics educationEngineering managementPsychologyEngineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Bioeconomy offers new approaches to dealing with environmental challenges, such as replacing fossil fuels with sustainable and renewable resources and fuels. So, knowing how African higher education students perceive Bioeconomy is important. To achieve this objective, an exploratory and quantitative study based on a convenience sample of 407 students was conducted. The data was collected using an adapted questionnaire and analyzed using descriptive statistics. The majority of students came from rural areas (88.0%), were female (56.’%), and were between 18 and 22 years old (52.3%). Students favor replacing fossil resources with renewable ones so that the transition to a sustainable Bioeconomy can be achieved (89.2%). The three main measures to be implemented if students were responsible for preparing a transformation plan for the Bioeconomy, are: (1) improvement of knowledge and information about Bioeconomy; (2) improving the participation of the population and companies in the transformation process; (3) developing of recycling and reuse of materials. Furthermore, the majority of students consider that the transition to the Bioeconomy could reduce the amount of plastic waste in the environment and oceans (67.1%), the loss of natural environments (55.4%), the emission of carbon (54.1%), species extinction (52.6%) and particle pollution (52.3%). Regarding students' perceptions about the beneficial contributions that Bioeconomy can provide, in economic, social, and environmental terms, students believe that Bioeconomy is capable of promoting major improvements, namely, creating new jobs (78.1%), achieving a more sustainable international development model (68.1%), improving access to new areas of research and education (64.6%), improving economic performance and regional and international competitiveness (63.6%), reducing dependence energy (58.7%) and ensuring the security and stability of the energy network (56.5%). This study also shows that students do not consider themselves adequately informed about pertinent topics related to the Bioeconomy since only around 27% reported being quite familiar with the sustainable development objectives defined by the United Nations. Furthermore, topics such as genetic engineering in agriculture, the cultivation of energy crops, and the digitalization of agriculture are only familiar to just over 10% of respondents. When asked which sources of information about the Bioeconomy they trust most, environmental and farmer organizations stand out positively, and national and local governments negatively. Regarding pro-environmental actions carried out by students in the last 12 months, the majority highlights the conscious purchases of regional food products (63.4%), neglecting other types of equally important actions, namely, the change in mobility behavior, the abandonment of packaged products, the use of renewable energy, the purchase of green products, among others. Finally, concerning interests and values, students believe that it is possible, by managing resources well, to avoid environmental catastrophes even though they realize that the environment is very fragile and that any human interference can result in devastation. Perhaps for this reason, the majority are not defenders of the free market and economic growth at the expense of the environment. There are gaps in understanding the advantages, visions, and topics associated with the Bioeconomy.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,300
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,366

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,277
Écart entre enseignants0,261 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle