MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4404991189 · doi:10.5593/sgem2024/3.1/s14.42

ASSESSMENT OF THE QUALITY AND PRODUCTIVITY OF LODGEPOLE PINE GROWN IN THE WESTERN PART OF LATVIA

2024· article· en· W4404991189 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM ... · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueForest ecology and management
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésProductivityPinus contortaAgroforestryGeographyForestryForest managementEnvironmental science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The research aims to examine the pace of growth of lodgepole pine, the amount of damage caused by biungulates and the quality of trunks for lodgepole pine provenances growing in the western part of Latvia in the areas around Ugale and Kuldiga, identifying the most damage-resistant and promising provenances for cultivation in Latvia. In Latvia, foresters and plant breeders have been working for years to increase the quality and productivity of local tree species, while assessing various forest stand management patterns and trying to reduce the rotation period of stands. Nowadays, because of climate change, i.e. with the climate becoming warmer, it is clear that in the future in Latvia not only a management strategy for the dominant tree species have to be changed but also the possibilities of introducing new tree species suitable for the conditions in Latvia need to be considered to reduce the forest rotation period. At the same time, introducing new tree species requires considering that the tree species must have economic potential, i.e. the wood has prospects for being processed and consumed (e.g. construction) in the local region, as carbon is sequestrated during the growth of the trees and stays in Latvia. Lodgepole pine is one of the tree species that could have prospects for cultivation on an industrial scale in plantations, which was introduced in Latvia at the beginning of the last century. Based on the experience of Swedish foresters in growing lodgepole pine on an industrial scale in the 1980s, experimental lodgepole pine plantations were established in Latvia by using both domestic seeds and those from the natural range in Canada and the United States, as well as from Sweden. The research analysed the following tree inventory data collected from the experimental plantations of lodgepole pines at the ages of 27 and 43 years in the western part of Latvia: the height and diameter of the trees and compared the data for Scots pine grown in identical conditions. In addition, the proportions of trees damaged by deer etc. as well as the proportions of trees with multiple tops and branch-to-stem attachments because these defects significantly reduce the chances of producing quality roundwood assortments in the future were analysed for both species. The data were processed using parametric methods. In an experimental plantation in the area near Ugale, 43-year-old lodgepole pines demonstrated a performance similar to that of Scots pines, with average heights of 18.2 and 18.4 meters and diameters of 19.1 and 19.0 cm, respectively, i.e. the differences were insignificant. In the plantation near Kuldiga, the differences were found significant, as the average height difference between the species was 1.3 m, while the diameter difference was 1.3 cm. It was concluded that lodgepole pines had lower trunk quality and were more damaged by deer. It was also found that the least productive lodgepole pine provenances were more damaged by deer.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,022
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,413

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,034
Tête enseignante GPT0,331
Écart entre enseignants0,297 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle