A discrete choice latent class method for capturing unobserved heterogeneity in cyclist crossing behaviour at crosswalks
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Conflicts between cyclists and motorized vehicles at crosswalks often lead to severe collisions. The varied behaviour of cyclists at these crossings introduces unobserved heterogeneity. Despite this, there is a notable research gap in studying the cyclist behaviour at roundabout crosswalks. To address this gap, we propose a discrete choice latent class method to capture the multi-level latent heterogeneity in cyclists' crossing behaviour at roundabout crosswalks. Latent heterogeneity can be captured at multiple levels: site-level, interaction-level, choice-attribute level, and individual-level. This method, rooted in behavioural theory, aims to provide a deeper understanding of cyclists' crossing decisions, enhancing safety measures at these intersections. We present an application of the proposed method to two publicly available drone datasets of naturalistic road user trajectories at roundabouts, including 8 roundabout sites that exhibit some level of similarity to minimize site heterogeneity. We capture the latent heterogeneity in the cyclists' membership to a distinct behavioural class at two levels using these datasets: the individual level, represented by the speed of the cyclist as they enter the crosswalk, and the interaction level, defined by the presence of vehicles approaching the cyclist. Our findings align with previous studies that emphasize the significance of the initial speed variable in influencing cyclists' subsequent behaviour and decisions. We identified two distinct classes of cyclists. We hypothesize that Class 1 cyclists, whom we refer to as passers, tend to bypass or overtake other road users at the crosswalk, especially in the absence of vehicles, prioritizing speed and efficiency. We also hypothesize that Class 2 cyclists, referred to as followers, exhibit more cautious behaviour, preferring to maintain a steady pace and avoid overtaking, particularly when vehicles are present. The proposed latent class model effectively captures this behavioural distinction, offering a more granular view of cyclists' decision-making processes at roundabout crosswalks. A key finding is that the discrete choice model with a latent class structure outperforms the basic model without it, despite having more degrees of freedom, as it achieves a lower BIC and AIC but improved model fit statistic. This demonstrates that latent heterogeneity can be effectively captured, leading to improved predictions and outperforming the basic non-latent class model. Classifying cyclists into distinct behavioural classes not only enhances cyclist safety at crosswalks but also provides valuable insights for the development of autonomous vehicle-cyclist interactions.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».