MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4405034535 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-211477

Uncovering the HOXA9 Translational Regulatory Complex That Promotes AML Leukemic Stem Cells

2024· article· en· W4405034535 sur OpenAlexaff
Xuejun Xie, Florisela Herrejon Chavez, Ilyes Baali, Eren L. Chu, Chiara M. Evans, Xuejing Yang, Su‐Huai Wei, Hanzhi Luo, Sun Mi Park, Kathryn Chang, Aspen Pierson, Grace Han, Emily Batchelor, Quaid Morris, Ly Vu, Diu Nguyen, Michael G. Kharas

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueRNA Research and Splicing
Établissements canadiensSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBiologyRNA-binding proteinTranslational regulationUntranslated regionCell biologyTranscription factorPhenocopyTranslation (biology)Messenger RNAGeneticsGene

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

HOXA9 is a master transcription factor of hematopoiesis and essential for maintaining self-renewal of leukemia stem cells (LSCs). Although mechanisms associated with its transcriptional regulation are extensively studied, how Hoxa9 mRNA translation is controlled remain poorly understood. We have previously identified the RNA binding protein (RBP) MUSASHI-2 (MSI2) as a central regulator of myeloid LSCs by controlling translation of crucial transcription factors including Hoxa9 (Park et al. JCI, 2015; Nguyen et al. Nature Comm, 2020). However, the mechanisms by which HOXA9 translation is modulated and the role of MSI2 remain unknown. To characterize the HOXA9 3'UTR mRNA regulon, we used it as a bait to perform an RNA-pull down followed by mass spectrometry (MS) with control or MSI2 depleted cells. To determine the direct MSI2's protein interactors on HOXA9, we also performed MSI2 co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) MS in control or MSI2 deficient AML cells. We identified 10 RBPs that directly bind to MSI2 and are dependent on MSI2 for their binding to the HOXA9-3'UTR mRNA. Among these, we focused on SYNCRIP, a known MSI2 interactor (Vu et al. Nat Gen, 2017), HNRNPC and MOV10, of which binding ability on HOXA9 3'UTR was most reduced and enhanced, respectively, upon MSI2 loss. Reciprocal co-IP confirmed the interactions between these RBPs with MSI2. We then reasoned that if these RBPs are in the same regulatory complex with MSI2, they might phenocopy MSI2 loss of function in LSCs. To understand how each selected factor impacts LSC function and gene control, we first assessed MSI2's global regulation by performing integrative omic studies including MSI2-HyperTRIBE, RNA-seq and proteomics in MLL-AF9 murine LSCs that have acutely deleted (68hrs) of Msi2. We found that MSI2 binding promotes translation of 264 genes while suppresses 8 genes; and only 10 genes affected at mRNA level. These data found that MSI2 mediates translation of the self-renewal program in LSCs. We then found that SYNCRIP is required for both leukemia initiation and maintenance in the MLL-AF9 driven AML model with the Syncrip conditional knockout mice. Serial transplantation assays of Syncrip deleted cells show a continued delay in leukemogenesis in vivo, suggesting SYNCRIP is required for functional LSC activity. To identify SYNCRIP's targets, we performed SYNCRIP-HyperTRIBE and iCLIP, and found that majority (~64%) of SYNCRIP targets overlapped with MSI2 targets and their binding sites are proximity in LSCs. SYNCRIP knockout transcriptome enriched for HOXA9-MEIS1 targets, and MSI2 deficient HSC signature. These data suggest that SYNCRIP is required for LSC function by co-regulating HOXA9-associated program with MSI2. Furthermore, depleting HNRNPC or MOV10 reduces AML cell proliferation, colony formation and increases apoptosis. Both HNRNPC and MOV10 depletion significantly decreased HOXA9 protein abundance. HNRNPC knockout cells exhibited delayed leukemia development in vivo and serial plating assays shows that this RBP is required for maintaining LSC' self-renewal. Importantly, higher HNRNPC or MOV10 expression associated with a worse overall survival in AML patients (p=0.0026 for HNRNPC; p=0.0101 for MOV10). ENRICHR analysis shows HNRNPC correlatedly expressed genes in human AML patients enriched for HOXA9, MOV10 and MSI2 signature. These data suggest that HNRNPC and MOV10 co-regulate leukemia HOXA9-associated program with MSI2. We also discovered that these RBPs collaborate in the translational regulation mediated by MSI2. SYNCRIP is necessary for MSI2 recruitment to the HOXA9 3'UTR based on reduced MSI2 binding after SYNCRIP depletion (MSI2-HYPERTRIBE and MSI2-RNA-IP). Luciferase reporter assays with HOXA9-3'UTR found that knockdown each one of the components in the MSI2-SYNCRIP-HNRNPC-MOV10 complex alone significantly decreased luciferase signal. Moreover, loss of each of the core components SYNCRIP and HNRNPC exacerbated translation inhibition caused by MSI2 depletion and attenuated the increase in translation resulted from MSI2 overexpression. Our data suggest that SYNCRIP and HNRNPC facilitate MSI2-mediated translation regulation of HOXA9. Overall, our study uncovered a MSI2-associated RBP complex co-regulating HOXA9 translation and LSC program in AML. We revealed that SYNCRIP is required for LSC function, and HNRNPC and MOV10 as novel vulnerabilities in AML.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,007

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,252
Écart entre enseignants0,230 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetRNA Research and Splicing→Travaux en français237 207→