MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4405034614 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-198798

A Randomized Pilot Trial Comparing Anti-Thymocyte Globulin (ATG) with ATG Plus Post Transplant Cyclophosphamide (PTCy) for Prophylaxis Against Acute and Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) in Matched Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplants (HCT)

2024· article· en· W4405034614 sur OpenAlexaff
Irwin Walker, Uday Deotare, Mohamed Elemary, Mahmoud Elsawy, Geneviève Gallagher, David Kliman, Tony Panzarella, Nada Hamad, Kirk R. Schultz, Jan Storek, Kristjan Paulson

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British ColumbiaWestern UniversityUniversity of TorontoDalhousie UniversityCancerCare ManitobaSaskatchewan Cancer AgencyBC Children's HospitalUniversité LavalUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of CalgaryPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreJuravinski HospitalMcMaster UniversityJuravinski Cancer Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAnti-thymocyte globulinGraft-versus-host diseaseMedicineCyclophosphamideImmunologyHematopoietic stem cell transplantationHematopoietic cellGlobulinTransplantationInternal medicineHaematopoiesisChemotherapyBiologyStem cell

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG, or ATLG) and post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) are used for the prevention of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Two ongoing randomized trials (ISRCTN50290131; NCT05153226) are comparing these agents for efficacy and safety, but the safety and efficacy of the combination is unknown and has not been well studied. We conducted a randomized pilot trial of a combination of these agents to assess safety, with the aim of an expansion phase III trial. Methods: Following CONSORT guidelines, we conducted a randomized pilot trial to compare ATG (standard Arm A, 4.5 mg/kg) with ATG plus PTCy (experimental Arm BE, ATG 4.5 mg/kg, PTCy 50 mg/kg x 2) with short term feasibility endpoints at 100 days but otherwise following a phase III design. Patients consented to two years follow-up in anticipation of an expansion to phase III, as described in the CONSORT extension for pilot trials (Abbade LPF et al (2018) DOI 10.1186/s40409-018-0142-2). Overall survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier estimate; the log-rank test was used to compare treatment differences. We randomized a pre-planned convenience sample of 79 eligible and transplanted patients. Median (range) age was 59 (19 to 74), 47 (59.5 %) were male. Patients had either AML (n=55) or MDS (n=24) and were transplanted using either myeloablative (n=49) or reduced intensity (n=30) conditioning. Donors, either sibling (n=28) or unrelated (n=51), were 8/8 HLA-matched. The primary feasibility endpoints included: (1) recruitment of the intended sample size, (2) 100-day survival of the experimental arm B to be at least 90% compared with the standard arm A, (3) complete data on 95% of recipients at 12 months and (4) completion of the trial within budget. A variety of secondary endpoints, both efficacy and safety, were included. Objectives 1, 3, and 4 were fulfilled and this abstract describes the safety and efficacy outcomes related to objective (2). Results at day 100: Forty-one patients were randomized to Arm A and thirty-eight patients to Arm BE. At the time of data lock (May 14, 2024), all patients had been followed for at least 100 days. Thirty-nine (95.1%) patients in Arm A and 36 (94.7%) in Arm B survived to 100 days (primary endpoint). Acute graft versus host disease (AGVHD) was reported in 15 and 6 patients in Arms A and BE respectively, of which 6 and 3 had grades II-IV and 3 and 0 had grades III-IV. At 100 days, 3 patients in Arm A and 3 patients in Arm BE were receiving systemic corticosteroids. Serious Adverse Effects (SAEs) were experienced by 31 patients in Arm A and 25 in Arm BE. Graft failure at 28 days occurred in 2 patients in each arm, with all patients achieving engraftment eventually. Median (range) days to engraftment was 19 (13-45) for Arm A and 22.5 (15-56) for Arm BE. Cytomegalovirus reactivations occurred in 10 and 7 patients in Arm A and Arm BE respectively and Epstein-Barr virus reactivations occurred in 7 and 4 patients in Arm A and Arm BE respectively. Results Follow Up: Median follow up of living patients was 23.6 months (range 3.19- 25.92) for Arm A patients and 22.9 months (range 1.64-25.07). Overall survival between the arms was similar at 12-months; 68.9% (standard error (SE) 7.5%) in the standard arm A and 75.4% (SE 7.6%) in the experimental arm BE (p = 0.52). Relapse or disease progression were seen in 7 patients in Arm A and 7 patients in Arm BE. AGVHD was reported in 18 patients in Arm A and 9 in Arm BE (grades II-IV 11 and 5, grades III-IV 5 and 1), with late (>100 days) AGVHD occurring in 3 and 2 cases in Arms A and BE respectively. CGVHD has been reported to date in 7 patients in Arm A and 4 patients in Arm BE, moderate or severe grade in 2 patients and 2 patients respectively. Conclusion: The addition of PTCy to ATG did not result in excessive adverse events in this pilot trial (to day 100), and long-term results remained consistent. The combination of ATG and PTCy can be used safely in future trials to further prevent graft-versus-host disease. Based on the demonstrated safety and feasibility of this combination, and encouraging signals of efficacy, planning for an expansion to a full phase III trial with a primary endpoint of GVHD, relapse free survival is underway.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,007
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai randomisé · Signal consensuel: Essai randomisé
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,010
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,039

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0070,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0030,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,002
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,003
Communication savante0,0010,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0100,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,257
Écart entre enseignants0,240 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationTravaux en français237 207