MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4405034714 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-197897

Mosunetuzumab Continues to Demonstrate Clinically Meaningful Outcomes in Patients with Relapsed and/or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma after ≥2 Prior Therapies Including Those with a History of POD24: 4-Year Follow-up of a Pivotal Phase II Study

2024· article· en· W4405034714 sur OpenAlexaff
Mazyar Shadman, Nancy L. Bartlett, Matthew J. Matasar, Stephen J. Schuster, Sarit Assouline, Laurie H. Sehn, John Kuruvilla, Pratyush Giri, Chan Y. Cheah, Sascha Dietrich, Keith Fay, Matthew Ku, Loretta J. Nastoupil, Michael C. Wei, Shen Yin, Y. Connie, Samuel Tracy, Antonia Kwan, Elicia Penuel, Lihua E. Budde

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Établissements canadiensPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreSpinal Cord Injury BCUniversity of British ColumbiaJewish General Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFollicular lymphomaRefractory (planetary science)MedicineLymphomaOncologyInternal medicineHematologic NeoplasmsCancerBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: Mosunetuzumab is a CD20xCD3 T-cell engaging bispecific antibody approved by the FDA and EMA for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) after ≥2 prior lines of therapy. In a pivotal Phase II study (NCT02500407), mosunetuzumab demonstrated high overall and complete response rates (ORR and CR) with a manageable safety profile in patients with R/R FL (Budde et al. Lancet Oncol 2022). Durable responses were observed after 3 years of follow-up, including in patients with a history of disease progression within 24 months from the start of first-line therapy (POD24; Schuster et al. ASH 2023; Assouline et al. EHA 2024). Here we present updated data after 4 years of follow-up. Methods: Eligible patients with R/R FL Grade (Gr) 1-3a and ≥2 prior therapies were enrolled. Mosunetuzumab was administered intravenously in 21-day cycles with step-up dosing in Cycle (C) 1 (C1 Day [D] 1, 1mg; C1D8, 2mg; C1D15/C2D1, 60mg; C3D1 and onwards, 30mg). Patients with a CR by C8 completed treatment without additional cycles; those with a partial response or stable disease (SD) continued treatment for up to 17 cycles. Hospitalization was not mandatory. The primary endpoint was CR rate as best response determined by an Independent Review Committee (Cheson 2007 criteria). Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), duration of CR (DOCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Follow-up response assessments were performed by investigators. Post-hoc analyses were performed for patients with or without POD24. Long-term safety was analyzed, including rates of serious infections after end of treatment (EOT). Results: Ninety patients with R/R FL were enrolled, of whom 47 (52.2%) had POD24. As of May 13, 2024, median time on study was 49.4 months. All patients either completed (63.3%) or discontinued (36.7%) treatment. Five patients whose disease relapsed after an initial CR received retreatment with mosunetuzumab. The ORR and CR rates in the overall population were 77.8% and 60.0%, respectively. Median DOR and DOCR were 46.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 18.7-not estimable [NE]) and 51.8 months (95% CI: 46.4-NE), respectively. Thirty-five (64.8%) patients with a CR remained in remission at 4 years. Median PFS was 24.0 months (95% CI: 12.0-NE) and the estimated 4-year PFS rate was 38.6% (95% CI: 27.1-50.2). Median OS was not reached, and the estimated 4-year OS rate was 82.7% (95% CI: 74.7-90.7). Of the 5 patients who received retreatment, 4 had a CR and 1 had SD following retreatment. In patients with POD24, the ORR and CR rates were 80.9% and 59.6%, respectively. Median DOR was 46.4 months (95% CI: 10.6-NE) and median DOCR was 46.4 months (95% CI: 18.7-NE). Nineteen (67.9%) patients with a CR remained in remission at 4 years. Median PFS was 21.7 months (95% CI: 11.6-NE) and the estimated 4-year PFS rate was 38.9% (95% CI: 22.0-55.9). Median OS was not reached; the estimated 4-year OS rate was 86.4% (95% CI: 76.3-96.6). No additional adverse events (AEs) were reported since the 3-year follow-up analysis. CRS remained the most common AE (all grades, 44.4%; Gr 1/2, 42.3%), occurring most frequently in C1. Serious infections were reported in 20.0% of patients, with no Gr 5 infections. Most serious infections (73.7%) occurred in the first 4 cycles. Among 69 patients who received at least 8 cycles of treatment, serious infections after C8 were reported in 3 (4.3%) patients. B-cell recovery to detectable levels was observed after a median of 19.0 months (95% CI: 12.8-25.1); immunoglobulin M recovery to the lower limit of normal was observed after a median of 40.7 months (95% CI: 36.1-NE). Conclusions: In this updated analysis, fixed-duration mosunetuzumab continued to demonstrate durable benefit in patients with R/R FL. Nearly two-thirds of patients with a CR remained event-free after a median of 4 years of follow-up, and retreatment data were encouraging. Efficacy in patients with POD24 was consistent with the overall population. The safety profile was manageable and most serious infections occurred in early cycles. With >4 years of follow-up, the durable responses, absence of new AEs, immune recovery after EOT, and ability to retreat, support a fixed treatment duration approach with mosunetuzumab in patients with R/R FL. These results continue to support the evaluation of mosunetuzumab in earlier lines of therapy, as a single agent, and in combination.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,015

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,287
Écart entre enseignants0,267 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations10
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment→Travaux en français237 207→