MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4405038581 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-199249

Development of a National Needs Driven Intrinsic Roles Curriculum for Canadian Hematology Residency Training Programs

2024· article· en· W4405038581 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Gwynivere A Davies, Siraj Mithoowani, Roy Khalifé

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAdvances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
Établissements canadiensOttawa HospitalUniversity of OttawaMcMaster UniversityJuravinski Cancer Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHematologyMedical educationMedicineCurriculumInternal medicineGraduate medical educationResidency trainingFamily medicinePsychologyAccreditationPedagogyContinuing education

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: CanMEDS is a widely used postgraduate medical education framework detailing seven roles necessary for physician competence. The “intrinsic” CanMEDS roles-Professional, Communicator, Collaborator, Leader, Health Advocate and Scholar-center around the Medical Expert role and are largely taught through the hidden curriculum by role modeling and observation. Despite the advent of competency based medical education (CBME), these roles are often underemphasized in the visible curriculum, with up to 40% of intrinsic role competencies not mapped to evaluations or absent from existing curricula. Additionally, Canadian CBME consists of four training phases, with the highest representation of intrinsic roles teaching occurring during Transition To Practice, which is the shortest phase occurring at the very end of training. We sought to explore the perceived needs for intrinsic roles (IR) teaching for Canadian hematology residency training programs, with a goal of implementing a national curriculum in residency training. Methods: An environmental scan of IR curricula within Canada and a targeted needs assessment of the hematology residents and program director (PD) at McMaster University (convenience sampling) were conducted in early 2022. Responses were mapped to existing curriculum milestones within the CanMEDs framework. This informed the delivery of a pilot IR workshop (virtual, May 2022) during the McMaster University hematology academic half day. Residents engaged in a group debrief immediately following the workshop and were subsequently asked to complete individual retrospective pre-post self-assessments evaluating their competency within each addressed IR on a 5 point Likert scale. We then conducted a national cross-sectional survey of hematology PDs (Spring 2023) to explore existing curricula, gauge interest in a national curriculum, and understand local needs. Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board approval was obtained to conduct the national survey. Data were analyzed descriptively. Results: The environmental scan identified several pre-existing tools for IR teaching and evaluation, many developed by the Royal College (Canadian licensing body), with limited utilization within hematology training programs in 2022. All four McMaster Hematology residents completed the needs assessment identifying numerous milestones within the Leader, Collaborator and Scholar roles, with minimal emphasis on the Communicator and Health Advocate roles. The McMaster University PD identified similar themes as the residents, with further emphasis on the Professional role, highlighting the need to “Recognize and manage conflicts of interest” and “Demonstrate a commitment to physician health and well-being to foster optimal patient care.” Our pilot workshop, attended by five residents, underscored the demand for a longitudinal, stage-adapted curriculum that includes interactive and in-person elements, along with pre-session materials to allow for self-reflection. A notable preference for limiting topics to 1-2 per session and focusing on learner-driven interests was also highlighted. The workshop self-assessment tool showed self-reported improvement in the Leader and Scholar role competencies, which aligns with time devoted to each IR during the session. The national survey of PDs, with 50% (8/16) response rate, revealed that the Scholar role dominates existing curricula, with lesser emphasis on other IR. PDs underscored the value of integrating teaching into daily clinical practice and expressed interest in a national curriculum, particularly emphasizing the Health Advocate role. Concerns about additional time demands on faculty and trainees to deliver and attend the new curriculum, as well as the need for appropriate evaluation measures, were noted. The need for faculty development and continuous quality improvement based on resident feedback was also emphasized. Conclusions: Hematology trainees and PDs acknowledged the importance of an early and longitudinal curriculum exploring the IR within Hematology residency, although there was disagreement about exactly which topics should be included. Local residents valued an interactive workshop dedicated to the intrinsic roles, which may be scalable into a national curriculum. Potential next steps include further development of this curriculum at a national hematology residents retreat.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,010
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Méthodes · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,936
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,795

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0100,011
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,001
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0020,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,025
Tête enseignante GPT0,342
Écart entre enseignants0,317 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreMéthodes

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2024
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetAdvances in Oncology and RadiotherapyTravaux en français237 207