MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4405038610 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-208192

MagnetisMM-3: Long-Term Update and Efficacy and Safety of Less Frequent Dosing of Elranatamab in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

2024· article· en· W4405038610 sur OpenAlexaff
H. Miles Prince, Nizar J. Bahlis, Paula Rodríguez‐Otero, Lionel Karlin, Luke P. Akard, Asya Varshavsky‐Yanovsky, Michael P. Chu, Yuya Nagai, David H. Vesole, Anne Hickman, Sharon T. Sullivan, Eric Leip, Umberto Conte, Andrea Viqueira, Alexander M. Lesokhin

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Établissements canadiensUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineDosingMultiple myelomaRefractory (planetary science)Term (time)Internal medicineIntensive care medicineOncologySurgery

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

BACKGROUND Elranatamab (ELRA) is a humanized, bispecific antibody that targets B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) on myeloma cells and CD3 on T cells. In the phase 2 registrational MagnetisMM-3 trial (NCT04649359), subcutaneous (SC) ELRA monotherapy induced deep and durable responses in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) naive to BCMA-directed therapy. Here, we report the long-term efficacy and safety of ELRA in BCMA-naive patients approximately 26 months after the last patient initiated treatment, including results after the switch to dosing once every 4 weeks (Q4W). METHODS Eligible patients had RRMM with disease refractory to ≥1 immunomodulatory drug, ≥1 proteasome inhibitor, and ≥1 anti-CD38 antibody. Patients were given SC ELRA as step-up priming doses followed by ELRA 76 mg QW for 6 cycles. Patients given QW dosing for ≥6 cycles who achieved partial response (PR) or better lasting ≥2 months were transitioned to Q2W dosing and to Q4W after ≥6 cycles of Q2W dosing. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), assessed by blinded-independent central review (BICR) per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria. Adverse events (AEs) were graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (version 5.0). Outcomes in patients who switched to Q4W dosing were assessed in a post-hoc analysis. The impact of Q4W dosing on efficacy was assessed by evaluating maintenance of response ≥6 months after the switch to Q4W. Patients were counted as responders if they had an assessment demonstrating response ≥6 months after the switch. The impact of switching to Q4W dosing on safety was assessed by comparing the incidence of TEAEs before and after the switch. New onset AEs for each participant were included for an equal time period before and after the switch (based on individual follow-up times after the switch), with a maximum time period of up to 6 months. RESULTS At the time of data cutoff (March 26, 2024), 23 of 123 patients (18.7%) remained on treatment, and 52 (42.3%) were still being followed in the study. After a median follow-up of 28.4 months per reverse Kaplan-Meier, the confirmed ORR was 61.0%, with 46 (37.4%) patients achieving complete response or better (≥CR), 23 (18.7%) VGPR, and 6 (4.9%) PR as best response. Median duration of response (DOR) was not reached (NR); the probability of maintaining a response at 24 months was 66.9% (95% CI, 54.4-76.7). Median DOR among patients with ≥VGPR and ≥CR were NR; the probability of maintaining response at 24 months was 71.5% (95% CI, 58.5-81.1) in patients with ≥VGPR and 87.9% (95% CI, 73.1-94.8) in patients with ≥CR. Median progression-free survival was 17.2 (95% CI, 9.8-NE) months. Median overall survival was 24.6 (95% CI, 13.4-NE) months. A total of 58 patients switched to Q2W dosing; 27 patients further decreased the dosing frequency to Q4W. Among the 58 patients who switched to Q2W dosing, the median time on the Q2W regimen was 13.4 (range, 0.03-22.2) months. In the 27 patients who further decreased the dosing frequency to Q4W, the median time since the switch to Q4W was 6.5 (range, 0.03-10.1) months. Among responders per BICR who switched to Q4W dosing ≥6 months before the data cutoff (n=25), 23 (92.0%) maintained their response ≥6 months after the switch, including 21 (84.0%) who maintained ≥CR. One (4.0%) patient had progressive disease (per IMWG criteria in ≥1 assessment), and 1 (4.0%) permanently discontinued ELRA within 6 months after the switch to Q4W. Among patients who switched to Q4W dosing overall (n=27), the most frequently reported (≥30% either before or after the switch) any grade TEAEs by system organ class (SOC), were infections (51.9% to 59.3%), hematologic disorders (40.7% to 25.9%), respiratory disorders (40.7% to 22.2%), and gastrointestinal disorders (37.0% to 22.2%). The most frequently reported (≥10% either before or after the switch) grade 3/4 TEAEs by SOC were hematologic disorders (33.3% to 25.9%) and infections (18.5% to 11.1%). CONCLUSIONS Overall, ELRA continues to demonstrate deep and durable responses and no new safety signals after long-term follow-up in a heavily pretreated population (median of 5 prior lines of therapy). These results suggest that reducing the dosing frequency of ELRA to Q4W may improve safety without compromising efficacy. Updated results with data from 32 months after the last patient's initial dose will be presented.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,018

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,269
Écart entre enseignants0,254 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations26
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetMultiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsTravaux en français237 207