MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4405039469 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-207510

Treatment Adherence, Satisfaction and Quality of Life of Adult Patients with Severe Haemophilia a: Results from a Real-World Survey of Physicians and Patients

2024· article· en· W4405039469 sur OpenAlexaff
V. Merla, Sheena Thakkar, Jasmine Healy, E. Morton, Kieran Wynne-Cattanach, Nathan Ball, Sophie Lai, Chris Blazos, Hanna Salehi

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHemophilia Treatment and Research
Établissements canadiensPfizer (Canada)
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineHaemophiliaQuality of life (healthcare)Patient satisfactionFamily medicinePediatricsSurgeryNursing

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: Hemophilia A (HA) is a rare, inherited disease affecting clotting factor; severity is determined by baseline clotting factor activity. Hemophilia often impacts daily living, and this worsens with increased severity. Current standard of care includes extended half-life (EHL), standard half-life (SHL), and non-factor therapies (NFT). These treatments require frequent infusions which may impact overall adherence and patient quality of life. There is limited literature available on how treatment choice affects patient-reported outcomes; this study aimed to assess patient treatment adherence and self-reported quality of life by treatment type. Methods: Data were drawn from the Adelphi Real World Disease Specific Programme™, a cross-sectional survey, with retrospective data collection of physicians and their male patients with Hemophilia A (PwHA), in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America. Data were collected between September 2023 and April 2024. Hematologists, hematologist-oncologists, and the pediatric equivalents were eligible for inclusion if they were actively involved in the management of at least one PwHA. These patients were invited to complete a voluntary patient self-completion form. Patients included in this analysis were adults with severe HA (baseline clotting factor <1%) who received prophylactic treatment at the time of data collection. Physicians reported data on demographics, treatment history/ adherence and quality of life. Patients voluntarily reported impairment to their health-related quality of life via the Haem-A-Qol, highlighting three domains: sports and leisure (S&L), Treatment (Tx), Future (Ft) and the total score (TS). The three domains and TS are transformed to a scale of 0 to 100; higher scores indicating higher impairment. Analyses were descriptive. Results: Overall, 94 physicians reported data on 374 PwHA that met the analysis criteria. Of these patients, 37% were on SHL, 22% EHL and 42% NFT. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 32.5 (13.3) years (SHL: 31.3 [13.4], EHL: 32.5 [13.2], NFT: 33.4 [13.2]). Physicians reported 45% of patients do not always take their treatment on time (SHL: 52%, EHL: 63%, NFT: 31%) and 54% were not completely satisfied with their patients' treatment (SHL: 73%, EHL: 72%, NFT: 28%). Of the physicians who were not completely satisfied, 53% reported their patient's treatment required too many infusions/injections (SHL: 59%, EHL: 57%, NFT: 39%). Of all PwHA, 75% had switched treatments from a previous prophylactic treatment, with the most recent regimen being discontinued due to “too many infusions/injections”. Physicians reported 33% of patients had difficulty with activities due to their hemophilia, the most reported impaired activity was the patient's ability to take part in sport or hobbies (SHL: 15%, EHL: 25%, NFT: 28%). Patient self-reported data was provided by 54 patients (SHL: 9%, EHL: 31%, NFT: 59%). Overall, 82% of patients reported they avoided physical activity due to their hemophilia (SHL: 100%, EHL: 88%, NFT: 76%). Patients mean [SD] score for the Haem-A-QoL TS was 38.8 [17.5] points (SHL: 42.4 [23.6], EHL: 35.5 [18.2], NFT: 40.1 [16.5]). Within the domains, patients scored 55.0 [21.4] points for S&L (SHL: 55.9 [24.1], EHL: 51.5 [23.0], NFT: 56.8 [20.7]), 41.3 [22.6] points for Tx (SHL: 36.2 [28.4], EHL: 39.5 [28.0], NFT: 43.1 [18.9]) and 45.9 [22.7] points for Ft (SHL: 49.0 [40.4], EHL: 40.6 [20.5], NFT: 48.3 [20.8]). For the domain S&L, 54% avoided sports either often or all the time (SHL: 33%, EHL: 60%, NFT: 54%). For Tx, 33% were often afraid of complications (SHL: 20%, EHL: 29%, NFT: 38%) and for Ft, 24% reported they often thought it would be difficult to lead a normal life (SHL: 20%, EHL: 29%, NFT: 22%). Conclusion: Physicians reported that nearly half of their patients (45%) were not always adherent to their prophylaxis treatment; reporting dissatisfaction with the high frequency of infusions/injections, in their current regimen. A large proportion (82%) of patients reported they were avoiding physical activity, indicating a burden on patients' quality of life. Similarly, this study found poor overall scores on different aspects of the Haem-A-Qol, i.e. sports and leisure, treatment, and future. This highlights the need for better treatment options to address patients' overall impairment due to hemophilia, in turn improving patient standard of quality of life.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,011

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,041
Tête enseignante GPT0,310
Écart entre enseignants0,269 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetHemophilia Treatment and Research→Travaux en français237 207→