Identification of High-Risk Patients and Establishment of a Clinical Prediction Model for Frontline Steroid Failure in Chronic Graft-Versus-Host-Disease
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: Contemporary practice for frontline chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) treatment predominantly involves the use of systemic corticosteroids. Treatment with newer agents for cGvHD including ruxolitinib, belumosudil or axatilimab may benefit patients at high risk of treatment failure. We aimed to delineate high risk characteristics associated with frontline systemic steroid treatment failure in patients with cGvHD. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 267 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with cGvHD and were treated with frontline systemic corticosteroids after allogenic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre in Toronto, Canada. We collected data including demographics, disease and transplant characteristics as well as characteristics and classification of cGvHD using NIH Consensus Criteria. The primary outcome of this analysis was failure free survival (FFS); failure was defined as 1) systemic treatment change, 2) relapse or 3) non-relapse mortality. We used the Kaplan-Meier method with log rank test for univariate analysis and the Cox proportional hazard regression model for multivariate analysis using a modified version of R. Results: The median age of the 267 included patients was 51 (range: 19-71); 107 patients (40%) were female. 186 patients (70%) had a myeloid malignancy. With regards to transplant characteristics, 171 patients (64%) had a matched related donor, and 249 patients (93%) received stem cell transplant from a peripheral blood source. 48 patients (20%) underwent T-cell depletion and 94 patients (35%) underwent reduced intensity conditioning. The proportion of patients with mild, moderate and severe cGvHD according to NIH criteria was 82 (31%), 140 (52%) and 45 (17%) respectively. More than one organ was involved in 226 patients (85%), with the skin (n=167, 63%), liver (n=163, 61%) and mouth (n=131, 49%) being the most common organs involved. The median follow-up duration was 2.6 years amongst survivors. FFS was 61.7% [95% CI: 55.6-67.3] at 6 months, 37.8% [31.7-43.8] at 1 year, and 26.6% [20.9-32.5] at two years; median time to failure among the 267 patients was 252 days [217, 321]. Age, sex, and type of underlying condition were not significant predictors of FFS. With regards to transplant characteristics, no significant association was observed between FFS and any of: stem cell source (bone marrow vs. peripheral blood), donor-to-recipient sex or donor/recipient CMV status, T-cell depletion, reduced-intensity conditioning or type of GvHD prophylaxis. On univariate analysis, history of acute GvHD grade III-IV, severe cGvHD NIH global score at time of initial diagnosis, involvement of more than one organ, and mouth or GI involvement were each associated with shorter median time to failure; of these, acute GvHD grade III-IV (140 days vs. 291 days; HR: 1.46, [1.01, 2.13], p=0.047), severe cGvHD at initial diagnosis (164 days vs. 294 days, HR: 1.75, [1.20, 2.55], p=0.004) and involvement of more than one organ (226 days vs. 508 days, HR: 1.75, [1.11, 2.75], p=0.02) were each associated with significantly shorter median time to failure on multivariate analysis. Matched related donor status was associated with significantly longer median time to failure on both univariate and multivariate (329 days vs. 189 days, HR: 0.63, [0.47, 0.85], p=0.02) analysis. We developed a risk score, assigning one point for each of the high-risk characteristics associated with frontline steroid treatment failure (severe acute or chronic GvHD, involvement of more than one organ and unrelated donor). With increasing points on the score, a progressively shorter median time to failure was observed: risk score 0-1 (n=136: 346 days [291, 673]), 2 (n=85: 217 days [164, 304]), 3-4 (n=36: 103.5 days [59-179], p<0.001). Increasing points on the score were also associated with reduced FFS at 1 (data not shown) and 2 years: risk score 0-1 (n=136: 38.3% [29.5, 47.0]), 2 (n=85: 16.1% [8.3-26.2]), 3-4 (n=36: 8.5% [1.8-22.1], p<0.001). Conclusion: Unrelated donor use, severe acute/chronic GvHD and ≥2 involved organs are high risk characteristics for frontline steroid failure. Future research should assess interventions including incorporation of newer agents such as ruxolitinib, belumosudil or axatilimab in addition to corticosteroids in these high-risk patients.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».