MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4405039792 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-203735

Patient Characteristics, Treatment Patterns and Early Outcomes of Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) Initiated on Talquetamab: An Electronic Medical Record and Chart Review Study

2024· article· en· W4405039792 sur OpenAlexafffund
César A. Rodríguez, Hsien‐Yen Chang, Yi-Hsuan Liu, Jinghua He, Hoa H. Le, Jessica Maitland, Alvi Rahman, Anabelle Tardif‐Samson, Bronwyn Moore, Marie‐Hélène Lafeuille, Saurabh N. Patel, Xinke Zhang

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Établissements canadiensGroup for Research in Decision Analysis
Organismes subventionnairesPharmacyclicsBausch HealthBiogenAstraZeneca
Mots-clésMedicineMultiple myelomaLenalidomideMedical recordRefractory (planetary science)ChartPediatricsInternal medicineOncology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: Talquetamab (TAL), the first-in-class GPRC5D-targeted bispecific antibody, was granted accelerated US approval in August 2023 for adult patients with RRMM. Pivotal phase 2 trial data showed >70% overall response rate (ORR), with adverse events including cytokine release syndrome (CRS; 76%) and dysgeusia (70%). To mitigate the risk of CRS, TAL is initiated with step-up dosing (SUD) including 2-3 step-up doses prior to the first full treatment dose, each 2-4 days apart. Given its recent approval, real-world evidence related to TAL is limited. Thus, this study aimed to describe the real-world characteristics, SUD patterns, dosing schedule, and early data on safety and effectiveness in patients with RRMM receiving TAL. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients with RRMM initiating TAL on or after the date of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval was conducted using Loopback Analytics (formerly Acentrus), an electronic medical records (EMR) database from both academic and non-teaching hospitals in the US. For patients with available data from physician notes in patient charts, a chart review was conducted to supplement information from structured EMR data. Adult patients were included if they received TAL (first date of administration defined as index date), had ≥2 diagnostic codes for MM on separate dates, and had ≥6 months of clinical activity prior to the index date. Patients were excluded if they had a clinical trial enrollment record during the SUD period. Patients were followed until the earliest of death or end of data availability (March 31, 2024). Results: Overall, 92 patients were included (median age: 68.5 years [≥75 years: 19.6%]; female: 46.7%; White: 69.6%; mean Quan-Charlson Comorbidity Index: 2.9). A majority of these patients started TAL between 08/2023-12/2023 (60.9%) and had been exposed to prior B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) targeted therapies (59.8%) including bispecifics (41.3%), chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies (28.3%), and belantamab mafodotin (12.0%). Chart review data was available for 50 patients, of which 14 (28.0%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of ≥2, 24 (48.0%) had high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities, and 10 (20.0%) had extramedullary disease. With a median duration of follow-up of 3.4 months, 77 of the 92 patients (83.7%) had complete SUD data, of which 25 (32.5%) and 52 (67.5%) patients had weekly (QW) and biweekly (Q2W) administration schedules, respectively. Overall, the SUD phase was completed within 7-8 days for 61 (79.2%) patients. Following the SUD phase, 44 (57.1%) patients received ≥3 treatment doses of TAL, with 14 (31.8%) and 28 (63.6%) patients initially on QW and Q2W, respectively. Overall, 14 (31.8%) switched to every 4 weeks (Q4W) or less frequent dosing (median time to switching not reached). Of 50 patients with chart review data, 23 (46.0%) patients had reported CRS; 10 (20.0%) had grade 1 CRS, 10 (20.0%) had grade 2 CRS, 1 (2.0%) had grade 3 CRS, and 2 (4.0%) had CRS of unknown grade. CRS was managed using tocilizumab in 14 (28.0%) patients and dexamethasone in 9 (18.0%) patients. Dysgeusia was reported in 34 (68.0%) patients, of which 21 (61.8%) had an improvement in dysgeusia within a median of 77.5 days. Weight loss was reported in 24 (48.0%) patients, with a median loss of 6.5% of body weight from TAL initiation; 9 (18.0%) had <5% weight loss, 12 (24.0%) had 5-<10% weight loss, and 3 (6.0%) had 10-<20% weight loss. A total of 33 (66.0%) patients had evaluable response data and 88% of them started TAL during 08/2023-12/2023 (first few months after TAL launch). With a median duration of follow-up of 5.3 months, the ORR was 81.8%. Conclusion: This retrospective study using EMR and chart review data provides real-world evidence of a heavily pretreated patient population who initiated TAL in the first few months after FDA approval. Most patients were able to complete TAL SUD within 1 week and some patients switched to Q4W or less frequent dosing during the treatment phase. The early safety profile was overall consistent with the trial with most CRS events being mild, most dysgeusia events seen to improve, and most weight loss <10%. Together with the observed real-world response rates to TAL, these early findings support the use of TAL as an effective treatment option for patients with RRMM.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,004
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,009

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,005
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,306
Écart entre enseignants0,280 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2024
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments→Travaux en français237 207→