Randomized Phase 2 Dose Optimization Trial of Modakafusp Alfa in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Modakafusp alfa is a first-in-class immunocytokine directing interferon-α to CD38-positive cells. In our previously reported phase 1/2 trial, the maximum tolerated dose of modakafusp alfa in patients with RRMM was 3 mg/kg every 4 weeks (q4w). In a cohort of 30 patients treated with single-agent modakafusp alfa 1.5 mg/kg q4w, the overall response rate (ORR) was 43% and median duration of response was 12.5 months; toxicities were primarily hematologic (Vogl DT, et al. Blood. 2022:140(Suppl 1):1357-59). Here, we describe the results of a non-comparative randomized phase 2 dose optimization study evaluating modakafusp alfa at the fixed-dose equivalents of 3.0 mg/kg and 1.5 mg/kg q4w (NCT03215030). Patients with triple-class refractory RRMM (refractory to a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory drug, and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody) were eligible if they had progressed on their last line of therapy. Patients were randomized to receive modakafusp alfa q4w at 240 mg or 120 mg intravenously over 1 hour, with corticosteroid use limited to dexamethasone 20 mg as premedication with each dose of modakafusp alfa. The primary endpoint was ORR. No formal statistical comparison between the two doses was planned. In total, 146 patients (71 patients in the 120 mg cohort and 75 in the 240 mg cohort) were accrued over 57 global sites and started treatment between Jun 2022 and Sep 2023. The data cutoff date for this final analysis was Feb 9, 2024. The median number of prior lines of therapy received was 6 (range, 3-17) in the 120 mg cohort and 6 (range, 3-15) in the 240 mg cohort. Rates of exposure to prior anti-B cell maturation antigen therapy were 48% and 43%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 7.3 months, the ORR was 32% (95% confidence interval [CI], 22-45%) in the 120 mg cohort and 41% (95% CI, 29-52%) in the 240 mg cohort, with median progression-free survival of 4.1 and 5.3 months, and median duration of response of not estimable and 9.2 months, respectively. In the combined cohort of 146 patients, ORR was 29% in patients exposed to an anti-B-cell maturation agent (BCMA), and 44% in non-anti-BCMA-exposed patients. Rates of grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) were 90% in the 120 mg cohort and 96% in the 240 mg cohort, with the majority of AEs being hematologic (grade 3-4 hematologic AE rates: 86% and 92%, respectively). Grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia were observed in 28% and 27% of patients in the 120 mg cohort, and 32% and 29% of patients in the 240 mg cohort, respectively. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia were observed in 35% and 21% of patients in the 120 mg cohort, and 45% and 23% of patients in the 240 mg cohort, respectively. Rates of serious AEs were 39% in the 120 mg cohort and 44% in the 240 mg cohort. Rates of grade 3-4 infections were 21% and 15%, respectively. Infusion-related reactions (IRRs) were observed in 25% of patients in the 120 mg cohort, and 16% of patients in the 240 mg cohort, with rates of grade 3 IRRs of 3% in each cohort. Three patients (4%) died on study in the 120 mg cohort, and 5 patients (7%) died on study in the 240 mg cohort. Our results confirm the efficacy of single-agent modakafusp alfa in patients with RRMM. The 240 mg dose appears to have resulted in both a higher ORR and higher rates of toxicity, which were primarily hematologic.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».