MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4405041947 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-201725

Blood-Based Proteomic Profiling Identifies Osmr As a Novel Biomarker

2024· article· en· W4405041947 sur OpenAlexaff
Hussein A. Abbas, Bofei Wang, Jennifer Marvin‐Peek, Bin Yuan, Araceli Isabella Garza, Jessica L. Root, Andrea Arruda, Yiwei Liu, Courtney D. DiNardo, Tapan M. Kadia, Naval Daver, Philip L. Lorenzi, Koji Sasaki, Steven M. Kornblau, Mark D. Minden, Farhad Ravandi, Hagop M. Kantarjian, Patrick K. Reville

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineChemistry
ThématiqueAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Établissements canadiensPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
Organismes subventionnairesGenentechServierAstellas PharmaDaiichi-SankyoIpsenSyndax PharmaceuticalsIncyteBristol-Myers SquibbAstraZenecaFoghorn TherapeuticsAstex PharmaceuticalsCelgeneIpsen BiopharmaceuticalsRegeneron PharmaceuticalsGilead SciencesChugai PharmaceuticalMenarini GroupAgios PharmaceuticalsGlaxoSmithKlineAmgen
Mots-clésBiomarkerProfiling (computer programming)Computational biologyBiologyMedicineComputer scienceGenetics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: Risk stratification in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is critical to tailor timely induction therapy. The most widely utilized risk stratification approach is the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) that usually requires bone marrow biopsy and genomic testing. Inflammation is increasingly recognized as a critical factor in AML. Novel biomarkers from robust blood-based tests are needed to accurately and efficiently risk stratify patients with newly diagnosed AML. Methods: We evaluated the inflammatory secreted proteome through blood-based proteomic profiling of 251 soluble inflammatory proteins in 543 newly diagnosed AML patients to derive and validate a seven-protein prognostic score (Leukemia Inflammatory Risk Score, LIRS). Multivariable cox models with L1 regularization were used to test the independent prognostic ability. Individual proteins were evaluated as independently prognostic in multivariable cox models and model performance was assessed by cumulative concordance index (C-index) and time-dependent area under the curve (tdAUC). Findings were validated in internal and external cohorts, including a prospective cohort of newly diagnosed AML patients. Results: Serum from 362 newly diagnosed AML patients were collected prior to the administration of definitive induction therapy and profiled for 251 inflammatory proteins using NUcleic acid Linked Immuno-Sandwich Assay (NULISA), a proximity-ligation assay based on NGS or PCR allowing attomolar (10-18) detection level. The average detectability of inflammatory proteins was 97.3% across all 251 proteins. Accuracy of NULISA assay was validated by the correlation with known clinical variables and overlapping proteins measured in our clinical lab. To identify proteomic features with prognostic significance each protein was fitted into a univariate Kaplan-Meier analysis within the entire cohort. 148 proteins significantly associated with overall survival (OS) (adjusted p<0.05) were retained to build a regularized Cox model with LASSO regression to obtain the most predictive proteins. This led to the identification of 7 proteins strongly associated with OS: FGF23 (HR 2.11 95% CI: 1.60 - 2.79, p<0.001), GFAP (HR 1.91 95% CI: 1.44 - 2.52, p<0.001), IFNL1 (HR 1.66 95% CI: 1.27 - 2.21, p<0.001), MUC16 (HR 2.52 95% CI: 1.90 - 3.34, p<0.001), OSMR (HR 2.15 95% CI: 1.63 - 2.84, p<0.001), PDGFA (HR 0.67 95% CI: 0.51 - 0.88, p=0.0042), and VSNL1 (HR 0.58 95% CI: 0.44 - 0.76, p<0.001). The cohort was then randomly split into training (70%, n=245) and validation (30%, n=117) cohorts to define LIRS integrating these 7 proteins based on the coefficients of Cox regression model and validate the prognostic value of the score. LIRS was prognostic of OS in training and validation cohorts and remained prognostic when censoring for allogenic stem cell transplant (SCT) in first remission (CR1) in all and intensively treated patients. By multivariable adjustment, LIRS was independently prognostic after accounting for known prognostic factors in AML (HR 2.31 95% CI: 1.85 - 2.89, p<0.001), including age, ELN, creatinine etc. C-index and tdAUC suggested LIRS significantly outperformed ELN 2022 risk model. Individual proteins in LIRS were ranked, demonstrating OSMR, previously unrecognized in AML, as the most important prognostic protein. Increasing OSMR concentration led to consistent increase in hazard of death (HR 2.18 95% CI: 1.79 - 2.66, p<0.001) and remained significant when censoring for SCT in CR1 in all and intensively treated patients. Furthermore, OSMR as a single prognostic variable had a higher C-index than ELN 2022. OSMR was independently predictive of relevant clinical endpoints including early mortality and response rate to induction therapy. Additionally, OSMR is rapidly and easily detectable in the blood of newly diagnosed AML patients. LIRS and OSMR findings were validated in an external cohort of intensively treated patients (7+3, n=113) and prospectively in an internal cohort (n=68). Conclusions: Through high-throughput blood-based proteomic profiling, we identified a novel and strong prognostic signature LIRS with OSMR emerging as the best single biomarker that improve on current risk stratification guidelines for early and long-term risk of death in newly diagnosed AML patients (Patent Pending 63/573,150). This work adds important information for clinical translation to better inform AML patient risk.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,004

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,287
Écart entre enseignants0,269 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsTravaux en français237 207