MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4405042223 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-198302

Outcomes of Immunosuppressive Therapy in Children Less Than Three Years of Age with Idiopathic Severe Aplastic Anemia: A North American Collaboration

2024· article· en· W4405042223 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Talya Wittmann Dayagi, Laura B. Willis, Catherine Corriveau‐Bourque, Michaela Cada, Zora R. Rogers, Taizo A. Nakano, Timothy S. Olson, Winfred C. Wang, Alfred P. Gillio, Thomas D. Coates, Anjulika Chawla, Paul Castillo, Peter Kurre, Christopher Gamper, Staci D. Arnold, Sarita Joshi, Amy E. Geddis, Jessica Boklan, Jennifer Rothman, James N. Huang, Gary M. Kupfer, Bertil Glader, Kelly Walkovich, Alexis A. Thompson, Rabi Hanna, David A. Williams, Akiko Shimamura, Yigal Dror

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Établissements canadiensUniversity of AlbertaSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineAplastic anemiaPediatricsImmunologyBone marrow

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is characterized by pancytopenia and is either inherited or acquired (idiopathic). Accurate diagnosis is critical for proper treatment; however, the frequent overlap in clinical presentation between idiopathic SAA and inherited bone marrow failure syndromes (IBMFS) presents diagnostic and management challenges. For patients with idiopathic SAA, immunosuppressive therapy (IST) is considered the standard of care, when there is no available matched related donor. While 70-75% of pediatric patients with SAA respond to IST, patients with IBMFS do not. To our knowledge, there are no published data on a specific age cut-off that predicts a higher likelihood of an inherited disease, to guide treatment with IST or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The aim of this study was to evaluate response to IST in children with SAA who are less than 3 years of age and to gain insight into the age below which response to IST is unlikely, suggesting an IBMFS. In a retrospective cohort study, we extracted data of patients diagnosed with SAA between 2002 and 2021 from 3 ethics board-approved multicenter databases: (1) North American Pediatric Aplastic Anemia Consortium (NAPAAC; 2002-2014), (2) Canadian Aplastic Anemia and Myelodysplasia Study (CAMS) and (3) Canadian Inherited Marrow Failure Registry (CIMFR). Patient characteristics, treatment and outcomes were collected. Patients were included if diagnosed with acquired SAA before the age of 3 years and received IST as a first line treatment for at least 3 months. Patients were excluded if they had physical malformations suggestive of an IBMFS, a first-degree relative with a history of bone marrow failure, or insufficient available data. Response rate was compared with published literature on pediatric patients with SAA over the age of 3 years. Descriptive statistics were utilized (SPSS V25). Among 31 patients aged 1.3-2.9 years (median 2.25) treated with IST as a first line therapy for SAA, 13 (42%) were male, 10 (32%) had hepatitis associated SAA, 3 (10%) had mild physical abnormalities (vesicoureteral reflux, patent ductus arteriosus, mild hearing impairment), none had short stature, and 7 (23%) had a family history of cancer (n=4), polycythemia vera (n=1), hyper-eosinophilic syndrome (n=1) or consanguinity (n=1). Twenty-nine patients (93%) were treated with horse anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) and cyclosporine A (CSA), while 2 (7%) were treated with cyclophosphamide (CTX). Of the 31 patients, 24 (77%) had a complete response (CR) to IST (including the 2 patients post CTX). Twelve (50%), 22 (92%) and 24 (100%) were transfusion independent by 3, 6 and 12 months from the start of IST, respectively. CSA was discontinued after a median time of 20.4 months (range 5.6-55). No relapse was reported during long-term follow up (median 79 months, range 29-233). Seven patients (23%, age 1.95-2.83 years, median 2.44), had no response to a first IST course, 5 of whom received a second IST course with rabbit ATG. Of these 5 patients, 3 (age 1.95, 2.44 and 2.45 years) did not respond to the second IST and underwent HSCT, 1 (age 2.8 years) had a partial response and became transfusion-independent, 1 (age 2.83 years, who had a second IST with tacrolimus) achieved partial response and then switched to danazol with a CR. Two of the 7 patients who did not respond to the first IST did not receive a second IST before transplant; 1 of them (age 2.25 years) had an unsuccessful response to danazol and 1 (age 2.04 years) had no interim treatment. Complications during the first 3 months post IST included infections (bacteremia/sepsis, n=5; cellulitis, n=2; viral gastroenteritis, n=1), gross hematuria (n=1), hypertension (n=4) and gum hyperplasia (n=1). In the 3-6 months post-IST interval, 2 patients had bleeding events (gross hematuria, oral bleed) and 1 had a bacteremia episode. In the 6-12 months post-IST interval, 1 patient had bacteremia, 2 had hypertension and 1 developed a chronic kidney injury secondary to CSA. In conclusion, our study indicates for the first time a high complete response rate of 77% in SAA patients under 3 years of age who were treated with IST, a response rate comparable to what is reported in the literature for IST response in older pediatric patients. Although our study is limited by its retrospective nature and a relatively small cohort, due to the lack of previously published data, this research provides critical insight to help in managing this age group.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,052
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,103

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,240
Écart entre enseignants0,231 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2024
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationTravaux en français237 207