Characterizing Diagnostic Investigations for Suspected Pulmonary Embolism in Postpartum Individuals
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant concern during pregnancy and the postpartum period, as pulmonary embolism (PE) remains a leading cause of maternal mortality in Western countries and carries serious morbidity including persistent dyspnea with reduced functional capacity, and rarely chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). While integrated diagnostic algorithms for patients with clinically suspected PE have been well established, pregnant and postpartum individuals have mostly been excluded from these studies. Recent prospective management outcome studies have demonstrated the safety of PE diagnostic algorithms during pregnancy and stressed the importance of tailored diagnostic approaches during this period. However, these studies did not include postpartum individuals. There is a lack of established postpartum-specific clinical prediction rules and high D-dimer levels after delivery may limit the utility of D-dimer testing. Issues such as radiation related to thoracic imaging in the presence of stimulated breast tissue and the importance of limiting unnecessary emergency department visits postpartum, especially considering the intricate care needs of newborns, need to be addressed. The aim of the present work is to capture diagnostic strategies used in postpartum individuals in available studies, PE prevalence among suspected cases, and if numbers permit, to determine the safety and efficiency of different diagnostic strategies for postpartum individuals. Methods: We analysed data from a large individual patient data meta-analysis (IPDMA) database of prospective PE diagnostic studies including more than 20,000 patients (PROSPERO: CRD42018089366), which assessed safety and efficacy outcomes of different PE diagnostic strategies. We identified studies including postpartum individuals with the postpartum period defined according to the study. Various diagnostic algorithms were employed, integrating clinical judgment and pre-test clinical probability assessments, in conjunction with D-dimer measurement, and, where applicable, lower limb venous compression ultrasonography and thoracic imaging. Our study objectives were to (1) provide a descriptive analysis of the diagnostic management of women with suspected PE and (2) report the PE prevalence in postpartum women presenting with suspected PE. Results: We identified 201 postpartum participants among six studies within the IPDMA database evaluating suspected PE strategies among non-pregnant individuals who presented to the emergency department. The follow-up period was 3 months post- presentation in five studies, and 45 days in one study. The mean age was 28.1 (SD 6.3) years. Five participants (2.5%) had a history of previous VTE. Dyspnea and chest pain were present in 68.8% (128/186) and 75.8% (141/186), respectively. Other presenting symptoms included cough (27.4%, 51/186) and syncope (10.2%, 16/156). Among these 201 postpartum individuals presenting with suspected PE, 12 had confirmed PE, corresponding to a PE prevalence of 5.9% (95% CI, 3.5-10.1). Among the 201 with suspected PE presentations, 101 (50.2%) had no D-dimer testing. Among 100 participants with D-dimer testing, 71% had positive D-dimers and 29% had negative D-dimer testing, based on standard lab cutoffs. Among the 29 participants who had negative D-dimer values and no additional chest imaging, there were no (0%, 95% CI, 0.0-11.7%) VTE events. Conclusion: As observed in the pregnancy population, the prevalence of confirmed PE among suspected postpartum patients was generally low. To minimize over-investigation, including radiating chest imaging, further research is needed to refine the diagnostic approach including D-dimer testing for PE in postpartum individuals.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,021 | 0,073 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,009 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,005 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».