Clinical Outcomes after Hospitalization for Oral Anticoagulant-Related Bleeding
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Use of oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolism is limited by serious bleeding complications, the most common OAC-related adverse event resulting in emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalization, and death. There are limited data regarding patient outcomes after hospitalization for OAC-related bleeding. Our objectives were to describe the risk of death, recurrent bleeding, and thromboembolism [deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke] after hospitalization for OAC-related bleeding, and to identify risk factors for these outcomes. Methods: Using administrative healthcare data from Ontario, Canada, we conducted a population-based cohort study of adults aged >65 years who were discharged after incident hospitalization for bleeding with OAC dispensed in the preceding 100 days (April 1, 2012 - March 31, 2020). The primary outcome was mortality within 100 days after hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes were the cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality within 1 year, and hospital and ED admissions for bleeding and thromboembolism. We examined associations between baseline covariates and mortality using multivariable Cox regression models to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), and Fine-Gray regression models to calculate adjusted sub-distribution HR and 95%CI for thrombosis, bleeding, and mortality. Results :Among 16180 cohort members, 14414 (89%) survived the index hospitalization and were included. Index bleeds were gastrointestinal (GI; n=9450, 66%), intracranial (n=1750, 12 %), genitourinary (GU; n=1178, 8%) or other (n=2036, 14%). The mean age was 81 years and 47% were female. Atrial fibrillation was the main indication for OAC (n=9,351, 65%). Patients were frequently prescribed factor Xa inhibitors (51%) and warfarin (39%). Within 100 days of discharge, OACs were dispensed to 9420 patients (65%), 87% of whom were prescribed a factor Xa inhibitor. Within 100 days of discharge, 28% of patients were re-hospitalized. The estimated cumulative incidence of mortality was 12% over 100 days and 24% over 1 year. Mortality was highest among individuals hospitalized for intracranial or GI bleeding over both 100 days (16% and 12%) and 1 year (26% and 24%). Using competing risk methods, the cumulative incidence of rebleeding was 11% (highest for index GI bleeding [11%]). The cumulative incidence of thromboembolism was 3% (highest for index GI bleeding [3%]). Baseline covariates associated with an increased risk of mortality were: cancer (HR 2.82; 95%CI 2.36-3.36), discharge to long-term care (ref: home, HR 2.06; 95%CI 1.82-2.34), Elixhauser comorbidity index ≥4 (HR 1.46; 95%CI 1.31-1.64), venous thromboembolism (ref: atrial fibrillation, HR 1.36; 95%CI 1.13-1.64), intracranial bleeding (ref: GU, HR 1.34; 95%CI 1.06-1.68), congestive heart failure (HR 1.35; 95%CI 1.22-1.50), dementia (HR 1.33; 95%CI 1.19-1.50), and increasing age (1-year older HR 1.05; 95%CI 1.04-1.06). Conclusion: Patients who survived hospitalization for OAC-related bleeding experienced substantial mortality, one-quarter dying within 1 year of hospital discharge. This confirms that older adults who are hospitalized for bleeding have a poor prognosis irrespective of index bleed site. The presence of cancer, discharge to long-term care and higher comorbidity burden had the strongest associations with mortality within 100 days. Evidence-based strategies are needed to identify and address risk factors to prevent OAC-related bleeding and to improve outcomes after serious bleeding.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».