MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4405042947 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-199105

Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) Use Reported Among Individuals with Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP): Data from the ITP Natural History Study Registry

2024· article· en· W4405042947 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Jennifer MacWhirter - DiRaimo, Laura Bou-Maroun, Debbie Jiang, Caroline Kruse, Michele P. Lambert, Cindy Neunert, Allison Remiker, Melissa J. Rose, Kevin Doyoon Won, Rachael F. Grace

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueComplementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Établissements canadiensKingston Health Sciences Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésImmune thrombocytopeniaMedicineNatural historyEltrombopagImmunologyPediatricsIntensive care medicineInternal medicinePlatelet

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background and Aims: CAM refers to non-traditional disease treatments, like supplements and dietary modifications, used either alone or alongside conventional medicine. The use of CAM in children and adults with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), an autoimmune bleeding disorder, has not been well-studied or reported. Patients may be reluctant to share CAM use with health care providers (HCPs). Here, we describe the prevalence, associated characteristics, and reporting of CAM use among individuals with ITP based on survey data collected from the ITP Natural History Study Registry. Methods: This is a prospective cohort study of self-reporting adults and caregivers of children with thrombocytopenia registered in the ITP Natural History Study Registry. Data were collected between February 2017-May 2024; from the following surveys: participant profile, diagnosis, treatment, COVID-19 (for non-COVID related recent treatment history only), and bleeding and hospitalization. Participants were included if they entered data for all five surveys. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, two-tailed T-tests, and chi-square analysis. Results: A total of 788 participants were included. Most were female (74%) and had primary (82%) and chronic ITP (78%). The median age at the time of ITP diagnosis was 33 years (range 1-85). The median age of survey completion was 51 years; age of participants ranged from <18 years (6%, 49/788) to 18-59 (62%, 492/788) to >60 (31%, 247/788). Most individuals live in the US (79%); other countries included Canada (9%), UK (4%), and Australia (3%). An additional 5% were from other countries. The majority had health insurance (94%; 729/788), and 27% (210/788) reported currently receiving treatment for their ITP. Of the 788 participants, half (49%, 389/788) reported using both traditional therapies and CAM, 44% (348/788) reported using traditional therapies without CAM, and 6% (51/788) had never used either CAM or traditional therapies. Only 23% had discussed CAM use with their HCP. CAM users were more likely to see a naturopathic/holistic provider for their ITP management (27%) compared to non-CAM users (5%) (p = 0.011). Dietary modifications were reported by 73 (9%) participants including gluten-free, vegan, macrobiotic, anti-quinine, anti-inflammatory, anti-aspartame, anti-caffeine and anti-alcohol diets. The most common diets reported were gluten free (45%; 33/73) and anti-inflammatory (44%; 32/73). Supplements were reported in 389 participants, although the specific supplement was reported by only 87 participants and included melatonin, folic acid, papaya leaf extract, coenzyme Q10, chlorophyll, and vitamins C, D, K, and B12. Vitamin D was the predominant supplement (90%; 78/87) used. Among CAM users, 10% reported using a CAM within the first year of their ITP diagnosis; 30% within the first 5 years, and 53% within the first 9 years. Despite the frequent use of CAM, when asked specifically about current or previous treatment for ITP, the majority did not select that they had used a CAM (98%, 634/646). CAM users tended to be older at ITP diagnosis (median age 36 years vs. 29 years, p = 0.0039) and survey completion (median age 53 years vs. 38 years, p = 0.00016) than non-CAM users and were more likely to be between the ages of 50-69 years (57%, 160/279, p = 0.0011) compared to non-CAM users. CAM users had a higher median number of prior traditional treatments (2 vs 1, p = <0.0001), and reported a higher education (college, university, or graduate studies) compared to those using traditional medication only (p<0.00001). There was no difference in CAM use by country, race, health insurance, income level, employment, or hospitalization frequency. Conclusion: CAM use was common among respondents particularly among older adults and those with a higher level of education. Half reported using either a supplement or dietary modification to treat their ITP although only 23% reported discussing CAM use with their HCP. HCPs should inquire about CAM use and specifically ask about supplements and/or dietary modifications as the term ‘CAM’ may not be understood, as shown here. Discussing CAM use with patients is important for evaluating drug-interactions with traditional therapies and the effect these interventions may have on ITP. Further studies should investigate the prevalence of CAM use in a wider ITP patient population and describe the reasons for, perceptions of, and types of CAM use in ITP.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,010
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,021

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,142
Tête enseignante GPT0,351
Écart entre enseignants0,209 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetComplementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesTravaux en français237 207