MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4405044741 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-209759

Annualized Bleeding Rates in Patients with Hemophilia a or B and Inhibitors with and without Target Joints at Baseline: Results from the Concizumab Phase 3 Explorer7 Study

2024· article· en· W4405044741 sur OpenAlexaff
Amy D. Shapiro, Shashikant Apte, Ana Boban, Renée Brown Frandsen, Silvia Linari, Johnny Mahlangu, Camila Martins Mazini Tavares, Tadashi Matsushita, Salim Nekkal, Jameela Sathar, Anthony K.C. Chan

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHemophilia Treatment and Research
Établissements canadiensMcMaster University Medical Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineInternal medicineSurgery

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background In patients with hemophilia, recurring bleeds into the same joint, known as target joint, cause hemophilic arthropathy and reduce quality of life. Prophylaxis is the current standard of care for severe hemophilia, started early in life to prevent onset and progression of joint damage by reducing recurrent bleeds, allowing patients to participate in physical and social activities, and improve their quality of life. Concizumab is a recombinant anti-tissue factor pathway inhibitor monoclonal antibody under development as a once-daily subcutaneous prophylaxis for hemophilia A/B with and without inhibitors. Here, we present the annualized bleeding rate (ABR) results in patients with hemophilia A/B with inhibitors (HAwI/HBwI), with or without target joints at baseline, from the prospective, multicenter, open-label, phase 3 explorer7 (NCT04083781) study. Aim To assess the ABR in patients with HAwI/HBwI, with or without target joints at baseline, during concizumab prophylaxis vs on-demand treatment. Methods Target joints were defined as ≥3 spontaneous bleeds into a single joint within a consecutive 6-month period; target joints were deemed resolved when there had been ≤2 bleeds in the joint during the previous 12 months (Blanchette VS et al. J Thromb Haemost. 2014;12(11):1935-39). Treated spontaneous and traumatic bleeding episodes were assessed at the 32- and 56-week cut-offs for patients with and without target joints at baseline. The 32- and 56-week cut-offs were defined as when all patients had completed the visit after 32 or 56 weeks respectively, or permanently discontinued treatment. In the explorer7 study, patients with HAwI/HBwI were randomized 1:2 to on-demand treatment (arm 1; ≥24 weeks) or concizumab prophylaxis (arm 2; ≥32 weeks), or assigned to non-randomized concizumab prophylaxis arms 3 and 4. After ≥24 (arm 1) or ≥32 weeks (arm 2-4), all patients were offered entry into the extension part, and patients in arm 1 switched to concizumab prophylaxis. Patients received a 1.0 mg/kg concizumab loading dose on Day 1, followed by an initial 0.20 mg/kg daily dose starting on Day 2, with potential adjustment to 0.15 or 0.25 mg/kg based on measured plasma concizumab concentration after week 4. Results for estimated mean ABRs are presented for arm 2 vs arm 1; descriptive results are presented for all patients (arms 1-4). Informed consent/ethics committee approval were obtained. Results Male patients (≥12 years) with HAwI/HBwI were recruited (2.3% American Indian/Alaska Native, 27.8% Asian, 6.8% Black/African American, 58.6% White, 4.5% not reported). Of the 133 patients enrolled (HAwI: 80; HBwI: 53), 19 were randomized to on-demand treatment (arm 1), 33 randomized to concizumab prophylaxis (arm 2), and 81 allocated to concizumab prophylaxis (arms 3/4). After the 32-week cut-off, 13 patients from arm 1 switched to concizumab prophylaxis. A total of 104 patients in arms 1-4 completed treatment at the 56-week cut-off. At the 32-week cut-off, for patients with target joints at baseline, estimated mean ABR (95% confidence interval [CI]) for treated spontaneous and traumatic bleeding episodes on concizumab prophylaxis (arm 2) was 1.7 (0.55-5.51) vs 10.6 (4.18-26.92) on-demand (arm 1); ABR ratio was 0.16 (0.06-0.48; P=0.001), indicating an 84% reduction in bleeding episodes. For patients with no target joints at baseline, estimated mean ABR (95% CI) for treated spontaneous and traumatic bleeding episodes on concizumab prophylaxis (arm 2) was 0.9 (0.48-1.58) vs 9.0 (5.59-14.53) on-demand (arm 1); ABR ratio was 0.10 (0.05-0.19; P<0.001), indicating a 90% reduction in bleeding episodes. At the 32-week cut-off, overall median ABR (interquartile range [IQR]) during concizumab prophylaxis (arms 1-4) in patients with and without target joints at baseline, for treated spontaneous and traumatic bleeding episodes was 0.9 (0.0-4.3) and 0.0 (0.0-2.8), for joint bleeding episodes 0.0 (0.0-3.9) and 0.0 (0.0-1.5), and for target joint bleeding episodes 0.0 (0.0-1.1) and 0.0 (0.0-0.0), respectively. By the 56-week cut-off, 92% of target joints had resolved (arms 1-4), and low median ABRs were maintained on concizumab. Overall safety data showed no new findings. Conclusion In the explorer7 study, once-daily, subcutaneous concizumab prophylaxis effectively reduced ABR irrespective of the presence of target joints at baseline at the 32-week cut-off, and low ABRs were maintained at the 56-week cut-off.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,014

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,028
Tête enseignante GPT0,312
Écart entre enseignants0,284 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetHemophilia Treatment and Research→Travaux en français237 207→