MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4405044760 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-193764

Real-World Experience of Switching to Prophylactic Efanesoctocog Alfa in Patients with Moderate and Severe Hemophilia a: An Analysis of the Adelphi Hemophilia Wave III Disease Specific Programme

2024· article· en· W4405044760 sur OpenAlexaff
Maissaa Janbain, Miguel A. Escobar, Manuel Carção, Andrew Wilson, Jennifer Dumont, Nathan Ball, E. Morton, Duygu Bozkaya, Anne-Laure Tardy, Sylvie Bozzi

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHemophilia Treatment and Research
Établissements canadiensSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineDiseasePediatricsInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction Hemophilia A is an inherited condition characterized by a deficiency of clotting factor VIII (FVIII). Efanesoctocog alfa is a first-in-class, once-weekly, high-sustained FVIII replacement therapy. In the XTEND-1 trial, efanesoctocog alfa provided superior bleeding prevention compared with pre-study FVIII prophylaxis treatment, and normal to near-normal FVIII activity for the majority of the week (>40 IU/dL) in patients with severe hemophilia A aged ≥12 years. Treatment outcomes of efanesoctocog alfa in a real-world setting are yet to be reported. Aim To use real-world survey data to characterize patients with hemophilia A who switched to prophylactic efanesoctocog alfa and their clinical outcomes. Methods This interim analysis of a retrospective, observational study utilized data from the real-world Hemophilia Wave III Disease Specific ProgrammeTM, a cross-sectional survey with retrospective data collection capturing linked physician and patient data. A physician-completed patient record form captured clinical and treatment data. Patients in the United States with moderate or severe hemophilia A who had switched from prophylaxis with FVIII replacement therapy or non-factor therapy (emicizumab) to receiving efanesoctocog alfa prophylactically for ≥170 days were included in this analysis. Study objectives were to characterize included patients and to describe their clinical outcomes. Since patients were treated with efanesoctocog alfa for less than 12 months, ABR was estimated using the formula (number of bleeds/days on treatment) x 365 days. Data were collected for this interim analysis from July 2023-June 2024. Descriptive data are reported. Results In this interim analysis, 10 physicians provided data for 29 patients receiving efanesoctocog alfa. The mean (standard deviation (SD)) age was 26.4 (8.3; range of 4-49) years, 55% (n=16) of the patients were of white ethnicity; all patients were without inhibitors at the time of survey, with 7% (n=2) previously having had inhibitors; the mean (SD) time since initiating efanesoctocog alfa was 8.8 (2.3) months. Prior to switching to efanesoctocog alfa, most patients (75% (n=21)) were previously treated prophylactically with standard half-life (SHL) FVIII replacement therapy; 18% (n=5) with extended half-life (EHL) FVIII replacement therapy; 4% (n=1) with non-factor therapy (emicizumab); 4% (n=1) with ‘other’ and 4% (n=1) were not recorded. Physicians reported that the most common reasons for their patients to change from their previous treatment were ‘too many infusions/injections’ (57% (n=16)), ‘more efficacious products available’ (43% (n=12)), ‘not being effective in preventing ABR’ (11% (n=3)) and ‘patient felt uncomfortable with the dosing schedule’ (11% (n=3)). The most frequently reported reason for prescribing efanesoctocog alfa prophylactically was ‘effectiveness in preventing ABR’ (76% (n=22)). In the 12 months prior to switching to efanesoctocog alfa treatment, the mean ABR was 1.07 (SD: 2.67; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04; 2.16), with 70% (n=19) of patients experiencing no bleeds, 15% (n=4) one bleed, 4% (n=1) 2 bleeds, 4% (n=1) 3 bleeds, 0% (n=0) 4 bleeds and 7% (n=2) five or more bleeds. Ninety-six percent of physicians reported that they were ‘completely satisfied’ with efanesoctocog alfa for their patients. On efanesoctocog alfa, patients had a mean (SD) dosing interval of 6.9 (0.4) days. The mean (SD) dose of efanesoctocog alfa was 49.3 (3.8) IU/kg. The estimated mean ABR was 0.21 (SD: 0.66; 95% CI -0.04; 0.46). Since the initiation of efanesoctocog alfa treatment 89% (n=25) of patients experienced no bleeds, 4% (n=1) one bleed and 7% (n=2) two bleeds. Conclusion Consistent with clinical trial data, this real-world survey supports the effectiveness of switching from factor (SHL or EHL) replacement therapy or emicizumab to efanesoctocog alfa resulting in low bleeding rates. Additionally, most patients do not experience a bleed in the time after switching to efanesoctocog alfa. The frequency and dose of efanesoctocog alfa in a real-world setting is aligned with the United States prescribing information. The limitations of this study were the small sample size and the limited duration of efanesoctocog alfa treatment. These data indicate that in a real-world setting, efanesoctocog alfa provides an effective alternative to existing treatments for hemophilia A, with a once-weekly dosing schedule.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,012
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,024

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,288
Écart entre enseignants0,261 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetHemophilia Treatment and Research→Travaux en français237 207→