The Burden of Transfusion Dependence on Caregivers of Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes in North America and Europe
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: Patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (LR-MDS) who are dependent on red blood cell transfusions (RBCTs) often face substantial disruptions to their time and daily lives due to the frequent demands of their long-term disease and its treatment. However, the burden of transfusion dependence (TD) on the caregivers of patients with LR-MDS has not been well characterized. Methods: This was a cross-sectional survey assessing the burden of RBCTs on caregivers of TD patients with LR-MDS in the USA, Canada, Germany, France, Spain, and Italy (August 2023-January 2024). Surveys were developed based on input from patient advocates, clinical experts, published literature, and exploratory interviews. Eligible participants were caregivers of patients ≥ 18 years of age with a diagnosis of LR-MDS and ≥ 2 RBCTs in the previous 4 months. The MDS Foundation (USA only) and a contract research organization recruited convenience samples of patients and their caregivers in each country. All participants provided informed consent. Results: A total of 120 caregivers completed the surveys (Canada, n = 31 [26%]; Italy, n = 30 [25%]; Germany, n = 29 [24%]; France, n = 16 [13%]; USA, n = 10 [8%]; Spain, n = 4 [3%]). The mean age was 55 years, 60% were women, and all were the primary or co-primary caregiver for their person with LR-MDS (patient mean age, 69 years). Almost half (48%) of caregivers were spouses/partners of their person with LR-MDS and 70% lived with the patient. Caregivers reported their person with LR-MDS had a mean of 6.3 RBCT visits in the previous 4 months (median, 6.0; equating to an annual mean of 18.9 and median of 18.0 RBCT visits). Caregivers reported that their lives were impacted somewhat, quite a bit, or a lot in terms of their ability to perform daily activities (61%), physical health (52%), emotional health (77%), and social life (82%). Most caregivers reported reduced time with family/friends (63%) and social events (75%) due to caregiving (sometimes, often, or always), as well as feeling stressed about caregiving responsibilities (69%). Nearly all caregivers (84%) reported providing emotional support for their person with LR-MDS and worrying about their person's future health (91%) and life expectancy (90%). Caregivers noted that RBCTs take too much time from their person's life (82%); they worried both about the patient possibly needing more RBCTs in the future (80%), and about blood shortages (64%). The most common MDS-related assistance reported by caregivers was medical appointment transportation (92%), household duties (84%), scheduling appointments (79%), and picking up medications (78%). In the previous 6 months, caregivers reported accompanying their person with MDS, on average, 4.8 times for RBCT visits, 5.7 times for lab tests, and 5.9 times for healthcare provider visits in addition to RBCT visits, equating to approximately 2.7 transfusion and lab visits per month. In addition to RBCT visits, caregivers spent a mean of 93.3 hours/month helping their person with LR-MDS. These included LR-MDS-related administrative tasks including assistance with personal hygiene, RBCT-related travel, getting insurance verification, managing billing issues, and scheduling appointments. Nearly half (45%) of caregivers were employed full-time (n = 38, 32%) or part-time (n = 16, 13%). More than half of employed caregivers (56%, n = 30) missed ≥ 1 workday in the previous 3 months and 25% feared they would have to retire early due to caregiving. Overall work productivity for employed caregivers was impaired by a mean of 38% (a composite of working time, absenteeism, and presenteeism), with 8% of work time missed (absenteeism) and 35% of work performance impaired (presenteeism). Caregivers reported overall activity impairment of 51%. Conclusions: Overall, caregivers of TD patients with LR-MDS reported a negative impact of MDS and RBCT on their time, employment, and well-being. These findings emphasize the downstream impact that effective, less burdensome treatment regimens may have on the people in the lives of patients with LR-MDS in addition to the patients themselves.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».