MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4405045156 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-204962

Etavopivat Reduces Incidence of Vaso-Occlusive Crises in Patients with Sickle Cell Disease: HIBISCUS Trial Phase 2 Results through 52 Weeks

2024· article· en· W4405045156 sur OpenAlexfundno aff
Sophia Delicou, Fuad El Rassi, Biree Andemariam, Miguel R. Abboud, Julie Kanter, Marilyn J. Telen, Jessie Githanga, Adlette Inati, Ibrahim M. Idris, Sunil Navani, Eric Wu, Andrew Eisenberger

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteCenters for Disease Control and PreventionNational Institutes of HealthBausch HealthNovo NordiskCSL BehringBristol-Myers SquibbAgios PharmaceuticalsState of Connecticut Department of Public HealthHealth Resources and Services Administrationbluebird bio
Mots-clésMedicineVaso-occlusive crisisIncidence (geometry)Internal medicineDiseaseSickle cell anemiaSurgeryGastroenterology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: Etavopivat is a potent, selective, once-daily, orally bioavailable activator of the red blood cell (RBC) pyruvate kinase isozyme, decreasing 2,3 DPG levels and increasing ATP levels in RBCs. In a phase 1 study, treatment with etavopivat in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) resulted in a rapid and sustained increase of hemoglobin (Hb) levels and decreased markers of hemolysis over 12 weeks (Saraf S et al. Blood Adv 2024). HIBISCUS (NCT04624659) is a multi-center, phase 2/3, randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled trial investigating the efficacy and safety of etavopivat in SCD. Here we report 52-week data from the phase 2 part of the trial. Methods: Participants were aged 12-65 years, with any SCD genotype, Hb level ≥5.5 to ≤10.5 g/dL at screening, and 2-10 vaso-occlusive crises (VOC) requiring a medical setting visit in the previous 12 months. Participants were randomized 1:1:1 to blinded oral etavopivat 200 mg, etavopivat 400 mg, or PBO, once daily for 52 weeks. Permitted standard of care included stable dosing with hydroxyurea (HU; ≥90 days prior), crizanlizumab, or L-glutamine (≥12 months prior). Primary study endpoints were annualized, independently adjudicated VOC rate over 52 weeks and Hb response (>1 g/dL increase from baseline [BL]) at Week 24. The primary efficacy analysis is reported for the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. We also report the analysis for the per-protocol (PP) population, defined as ≥80% protocol compliance and completion of the double-blind period with no major protocol deviations. Hemolysis biomarkers (absolute reticulocyte count, indirect bilirubin and lactate dehydrogenase [LDH]), and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMIS Fatigue Scale) were assessed. Results: Sixty participants (19 male [32%], 7 adolescents [12%], 54 HbSS genotype [90%]) were randomized to receive etavopivat 200 mg (n=21), etavopivat 400 mg (n=20), or PBO (n=19). Mean (SD) age was 33.5 (13.7) years and BL Hb level was 8.4 (1.16) g/dL. Mean (SD) number of VOCs in the previous 12 months was 3.3 (1.78). Concomitant HU was used by 16 (76%), 13 (65%) and 14 (74%) participants in the etavopivat 200 mg, 400 mg, and PBO groups, respectively. Six participants in each etavopivat group and 3 in the PBO group discontinued the study drug early (2 in the 200 mg group secondary to an adverse event [AE]). In the ITT population, annualized VOC rates were 1.07 for the etavopivat 200 mg group, 1.06 for the 400 mg group and 1.97 for PBO. VOC rate ratios for etavopivat:PBO (95% CI; % reduction) were 0.55 (0.24, 1.26; 45.7%) for the 200 mg group and 0.54 (0.23, 1.26; 46.2%) for the 400 mg group. Median time to first VOC was 33.6 weeks for each etavopivat group and 16.9 weeks for PBO. Hb response at Week 24 was 38% (n=8/21) in the 200 mg group, 25% (n=5/20) in the 400 mg group and 11% (n=2/19) in the PBO group. Hb response with etavopivat was seen early by Week 2 and was maintained over 52 weeks. In the PP population, annualized VOC rates were 0.66 (n=13) for the 200 mg group, 0.7 (n=12) for the 400 mg group and 1.77 (n=15) for PBO. VOC rate ratios (95% CI; % reduction) were 0.37 (0.16, 0.85; 62.7%) for the 200 mg group and 0.39 (0.17, 0.90; 60.5%) for the 400 mg group. Hb response at Week 24 was 46% (n=6/13) in the 200 mg group, 33% (n=4/12) in the 400 mg group and 13% (n=2/15) in the PBO group. Mean change from BL Hb levels at Week 24 were 1.11 g/dL (n=8) for the 200 mg group, 0.73 g/dL (n=10) for the 400 mg group and 0.15 g/dL (n=14) for PBO. In the ITT population, all hemolysis biomarkers decreased from BL in both etavopivat groups at Week 24; with the LDH decrease sustained through Week 52. PROMIS Fatigue Scale showed improvements for participants receiving etavopivat. Most reported AEs in any group were mild to moderate and resolved without action. Serious AEs, all of which resolved, were reported by 5 participants in the etavopivat 200 mg group (1 hepatic enzyme increase possibly drug related), 4 in the 400 mg group (1 Hb decrease possibly drug related) and 3 in the PBO group; 1 cerebrovascular accident unrelated to therapy occurred in the 200 mg group. Insomnia was reported by 3 participants in the 400 mg group. Conclusions: Compared with PBO, etavopivat reduced annualized VOC rate through Week 52, increased Hb levels at Week 24, and improved hemolysis markers and patient-reported fatigue, consistent with potential clinical benefit. Etavopivat was well tolerated. Based on the totality of data, proof of concept was established for etavopivat in SCD.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai randomisé · Signal consensuel: Essai randomisé
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,210
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,568

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,271
Écart entre enseignants0,261 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations7
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersTravaux en français237 207