MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4405045339 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-208486

Efficacy and Safety of Giroctocogene Fitelparvovec in Adults with Moderately Severe to Severe Hemophilia Α: Primary Analysis Results from the Phase 3 ΑFFINE Gene Therapy Trial

2024· article· en· W4405045339 sur OpenAlexaff
Andrew D. Leavitt, Kaan Kavaklı, Laurent Frenzel, Bülent Antmen, Margareth C. Ozelo, Davide Matino, Hazza Alzahrani, Barbara A. Konkle, Steven W. Pipe, Jerome Teitel, Li‐Jung Tseng, Annie Fang, Florence Ganne, Gregory B. DiRusso, Jeremy Rupon, Jasmine Healy, Delphine Agathon, Francesca Biondo, Frank Plonski

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHemophilia Treatment and Research
Établissements canadiensPfizer (Canada)St. Michael's HospitalUniversity of TorontoMcMaster UniversityThrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research Institute
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicinePediatricsIntention-to-treat analysisClinical trialInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background Giroctocogene fitelparvovec (PF-07055480), a hepatocyte-directed recombinant AAV serotype 6 vector encoding a B-domain-deleted variant of human factor VIII (FVIII), is a single-dose gene therapy aimed at enabling sustained endogenous FVIII expression in individuals with hemophilia A (HA). We present results from the primary analysis of an ongoing pivotal phase 3 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of giroctocogene fitelparvovec in participants with moderately severe to severe HA. Methods AFFINE (NCT04370054) is a phase 3, open-label, single-arm trial that enrolled adult men with HA (FVIII:C ≤1%) who completed a lead-in study while on exogenous FVIII prophylaxis therapy prior to administration of a single infusion of 3e13 vg/kg giroctocogene fitelparvovec. Primary and secondary endpoints were assessed in the efficacy population corresponding to participants with ≥15 months follow-up post infusion and ≥6 months follow-up in the lead-in study (n=50). The primary endpoint was annualized bleeding rate (ABR) for total (treated and untreated) bleeds from Week 12 (estimated onset of clinically meaningful transgene-derived FVIII levels) through ≥15 months (up to data cutoff) post infusion compared with the pre-infusion prophylaxis period. Key secondary endpoints were the percentage of participants with FVIII activity >5% (chromogenic assay) at 15 months and ABR for treated bleeds. Annualized infusion rate (AIR) of exogenous FVIII replacement from Week 12 to ≥15 months post infusion was a secondary endpoint. Additional secondary endpoints, including the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs), were assessed for all dosed participants (n=75). Results As of June 2024, 75 participants (median age, 30 years [range 19-59]) were dosed with giroctocogene fitelparvovec (median duration of follow-up, 16.8 months [range 7.8-44.4]). Of those, 50 were included in the efficacy population (median duration of follow-up, 33.6 months [range 14.5-44.4]). Within this population, the study met its primary endpoint with a statistically significant decrease (non-inferiority and superiority; 1-sided P=0.004) in total ABR from Week 12 through ≥15 months post infusion vs pre-infusion prophylaxis (mean total ABR, 1.24 vs 4.73; treatment difference, −3.49 [95% CI: −6.06, −0.91]). At Month 15, 84% of participants had FVIII activity >5% (95% CI: 70.9, 92.8; 1-sided P=0.0086 vs null hypothesis of ≤68%). Most participants continued to maintain FVIII activity >5% at later timepoints (82.8% at Year 2 [n=29]). Treated ABR during Week 12 through ≥15 months post infusion was significantly reduced vs prophylaxis (mean treated ABR, 0.07 vs 4.08; treatment difference, −4.01 [95% CI: −5.57, −2.45]; 1-sided P<0.0001), also demonstrating superiority. During the same period, 64% of participants had no bleeds and 88% of participants had no treated bleeds. AIR post infusion was reduced by 99.8% vs the pre-infusion period (mean AIR, 0.2 vs 124.4). At data cutoff, 1 (1.3%) dosed participant had resumed prophylaxis (at 16.1 months post infusion). A total of 624 AEs, mostly mild or moderate, were reported in 74 (98.7%) participants. There were 26 serious AEs (SAEs) in 15 (20%) participants, with pyrexia the most common (n=5 [6.7%]). The most common treatment-related AEs were pyrexia (in 54.7%), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) increased (in 46.7%), and headache (in 38.7%). There have been no study discontinuations. Post infusion, 62.7% of participants received ≥1 dose of corticosteroids due to ALT elevations or decreases in FVIII activity (median time to initiation, 84 days [range 7-193] and mean total time on corticosteroids, 114.6 days [range 11-296]). AEs related to corticosteroids were reported in 19 (25.3%) participants. Transient FVIII activity >150% (defined as ≥1 central chromogenic assay measurement >150%) was reached in 37 (49.3%) participants; based on protocol recommendations and upon investigator's decision, 23 (30.7%) were treated with prophylactic direct oral anticoagulants, which was well tolerated. Conclusions Giroctocogene fitelparvovec yielded endogenous FVIII expression in the mild to normal range in most participants, and resulted in superior bleed protection vs routine FVIII prophylaxis and significant reductions in bleeding. A single infusion was well tolerated and demonstrated durable efficacy on all primary and key secondary endpoints.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai randomisé · Signal consensuel: Essai randomisé
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,011

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,303
Écart entre enseignants0,277 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations10
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetHemophilia Treatment and ResearchTravaux en français237 207