MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4405045409 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-202603

Sickle Cell Disease-Related Worry and Associations with Healthcare Utilization in Youth with Sickle Cell Disease

2024· article· en· W4405045409 sur OpenAlexaff
Alex Pizzo, Guolian Kang, Victoria Okhomina, Jerlym S. Porter, Jason Hodges, Parul Rai, Clifford M. Takemoto, Jane S. Hankins, Nicole M. Alberts

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Établissements canadiensConcordia University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDiseaseMedicineWorrySickle cell anemiaCellHealth careAcute chest syndromeIntensive care medicineInternal medicineAnxietyPsychiatryGeneticsBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background and Aims: Disease-specific worries and anxiety (e.g., concerns of medical or treatment complications and disease progression) are common among youth with a chronic illness (e.g., cancer, rheumatoid arthritis). Moreover, they are associated with a host of negative outcomes, including pain, psychological distress, and increased healthcare utilization. Despite the impact of disease-specific worry among youth with chronic illness and the significant lifelong burden of sickle cell disease (SCD), little is known about SCD-related worry among youth with SCD. The current study aimed to characterize SCD-related worry across two developmental stages: school-aged children (8-12 years) and adolescents (13-19 years), and to identify risk factors (i.e., demographic, treatment-related, diagnostic, psychosocial factors) associated with elevated SCD-related worry. Associations between SCD-related worry and healthcare utilization were examined as a secondary aim. Methods: A sample of youth (N = 538, mean age = 14.0 years, standard deviation [SD] = 3.0 years, range = 11-19 years, 49.6% female, 60.4% SS/Sβ0, 27.5% SC, 8.9% Sβ+) living with SCD enrolled in the Sickle Cell Research and Intervention Program (SCCRIP) cohort (Hankins et al. Pediatric Blood & Cancer 2018; PMID 29797644) completed study procedures. Within this sample, patients completed 9 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = never, 1 = almost never, 2 = sometimes, 3 = often, 4 = almost always) from the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Sickle Cell Disease Module (PedsQL-SCD) that assessed SCD-related worries (e.g., concerns of pain, acute medical complications). Patients also completed PedsQL-SCD items that assessed low mood (1-item), pain (Pain and Hurt subscale), and pain interference (Pain Impact subscale). All items were completed via self-report. Response scales of items were converted to a 100-point scale (0 = 0, 1 = 25, 2 = 50, 3 = 75, 4 = 100). Demographics, treatment-related factors, SCD-genotype, physical comorbidities, and acute healthcare utilization were obtained from the SCCRIP database. To examine SCD-related worry, we calculated the average response across all SCD-related worry items. We also calculated the percentage of school-age and adolescent patients scoring ≥75 on individual SCD-related worry items. Regression models adjusted for age and sex were calculated to examine the effect of demographic, disease, disease modifying therapy, low mood, pain, and healthcare utilization on SCD-related worry. Results: The mean average response for SCD-related worry items from the overall sample was 24.2 (SD = 20.4) indicating overall low levels of worry. The mean average response on SCD-related worry items was comparable for school-age children (mean = 22.9, SD = 19.9) and adolescents (mean = 25.9, SD = 20.9). Regarding specific elevated worries, the most common worry amongst the overall sample was “I worry others will not know what to do if I have pain,” with 14% of youth reporting this worry occurred often or almost always (i.e., score ≥75 on the item) in the past month. In addition, a greater number of adolescents than school-age children reported often or almost always on this item (17.5% vs. 11.2%, p = 0.049). In contrast, a higher percentage of school-age children compared to adolescents reported often or almost always on the item “I worry I might have a stroke” (9.3% vs. 4.4% p = 0.04). Among all youth, increased SCD-related worry was associated with a greater number of individuals living in the household (beta-coefficient [standard error]; 1.4[0.6], p = 0.02) as well as low mood (0.3[0.03], p < 0.01), pain intensity (0.5[0.03], p < 0.01), pain interference (0.6[0.04], p < 0.01), and increased number of pain-related hospital admissions in the past year (2.8[1.1], p = 0.01). Male sex (-3.0[1.8], p = 0.09) and a history of stroke (5.8[3.5], p = 0.1) were both marginally associated with SCD-related worry. Conclusions: Little research has examined SCD-related worry among youth with SCD. Demographic factors, history of stroke, low mood, pain, and healthcare utilization were associated with elevated SCD-related worry. Similar to other studies examining disease-specific worries among youth with a chronic illness, robust associations emerged between SCD-related worry and low mood, pain, and pain-related disability. These findings are notable and more in-depth examination of SCD-related worry is warranted.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,008
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,016

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,230
Écart entre enseignants0,218 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders→Travaux en français237 207→