MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4405045446 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-200925

Safety and Efficacy of Bromodomain and Extra-Terminal Inhibitor INCB057643 in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Myelofibrosis and Other Advanced Myeloid Neoplasms: A Phase 1 Study

2024· article· en· W4405045446 sur OpenAlexaff
Justin M. Watts, Anthony M. Hunter, Alessandro Vannuchhi, Vikas Gupta, Srinivas K. Tantravahi, Alessandra Iurlo, Brandon McMahon, Francesca Palandri, María Teresa Gómez‐Casares, Junichiro Yuda, Emma Searle, Anna B. Halpern, Rosa Ayala, Akihiro Tomita, Blanca Xicoy, Prithviraj Bose, Brandi Reeves, Xuejun Chen, Lea Burke, Feng Zhou, Fred Zheng, Pankit Vachhani

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
Établissements canadiensPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineTolerabilityMyelofibrosisInternal medicineAnemiaPhases of clinical researchGastroenterologyNeutropeniaRuxolitinibOncologyAdverse effectClinical trialChemotherapyBone marrow

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: Bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) proteins are epigenetic readers that regulate expression of critical oncoproteins involved in the pathophysiology of hematologic malignancies, including myelofibrosis (MF). In a previous phase 1/2 clinical trial, INCB057643 (an oral, small-molecule BET inhibitor) evaluated as monotherapy or combination (combo) with the Janus kinase (JAK)1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib (RUX) showed favorable tolerability and encouraging clinical activity in patients (pts) with advanced MF. Methods: This ongoing phase 1, open-label 3+3 dose-escalation/expansion study (NCT04279847) is evaluating INCB057643 as monotherapy (part 1; 4 mg→12 mg once daily [qd]) in adults with relapsed/refractory MF, essential thrombocythemia (ET), myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), or MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) overlap syndromes, or as combo therapy (part 2; 4 mg qd→part 1 maximum tolerated dose) with RUX in adults with MF who have suboptimal response to RUX. Primary endpoints are safety/tolerability, including dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Secondary endpoints include spleen volume (SV) response (≥35% reduction from baseline [BL] in SV [SVR35] at Week 24), symptom response (≥50% reduction from BL in MPN-Symptom Assessment Form total symptom score [TSS50] at Week 24), and anemia response (hemoglobin increase ≥1.5 g/dL from BL [if transfusion independent at BL] or achieving transfusion independence [if dependent at BL] for ≥12 weeks). Results: Among pts treated with ≥1 dose of INCB057643 as of March 29, 2024, 18 were treated in part 1 monotherapy dose escalation (median [range] age, 71 [50-79] years), 10 in part 1 monotherapy dose expansion (68 [50-79] years), and 16 in part 2 combo therapy dose escalation (71 [50-76] years; median [range] RUX dose, 22.4 [10.0-47.2] mg/day). Overall, 37 (84.1%) pts had MF, 5 (11.4%) had MDS or MDS/MPN, and 2 (4.5%) had ET. Median (range) duration of INCB057643 exposure was 195.5 (15-654) days (d) in the monotherapy dose-escalation cohort, 139.0 (14-183) d in the monotherapy dose-expansion cohort, and 194.0 (85-402) d in the combo therapy dose-escalation cohort. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs, >25.0%) overall were thrombocytopenia (59.1%), nausea (29.5%), and anemia (27.3%). Grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred in 61.4% overall, with thrombocytopenia or platelet count decrease (36.4%) and anemia (20.5%) the most common. Serious TEAEs occurred in 25.0% overall. There were 2 treatment-related serious TEAEs, 6 TEAEs leading to discontinuation, and no treatment-related fatal events. Two DLTs occurred with monotherapy (12 mg, thrombocytopenia, hyperbilirubinemia) and 1 with combo therapy (6 mg, thrombocytopenia). One pt with MDS/MPN experienced acute myeloid leukemia transformation. No clear/consistent clinically significant cardiotoxicity signals were identified. Among evaluable monotherapy MF pts, Week 24 SVR35 was achieved by 3/16 pts treated with any dose (3/7 receiving ≥10 mg); improvements in SV at any time during the treatment period were observed in 13/19 pts treated with any dose. Among evaluable pts receiving combo therapy, Week 24 SVR35 was achieved by 3/12 pts treated with any combo dose; improvements in SV at any time during the treatment period were observed in 13/16 treated with any combo dose. Of the evaluable pts receiving monotherapy, Week 24 TSS50 was achieved by 5/14 pts treated with any dose (5/7 receiving ≥10 mg); of 19 pts treated at any dose, 12 achieved best response of TSS50 during the treatment period. Among evaluable pts receiving combo therapy, Week 24 TSS50 was achieved by 6/11 pts treated with any combo dose; of 15 pts treated at any dose, 10 achieved best response of TSS50 during the treatment period. Among 19 and 14 evaluable pts receiving monotherapy or combo therapy who were not transfusion dependent at BL, 3 each had anemia response. Lastly, 2/6 evaluable pts who were transfusion dependent at BL achieved transfusion independence (both received monotherapy). Conclusions: Treatment with INCB057643 monotherapy or in combo with RUX was generally well tolerated, with no treatment-related fatal events. Improvements in anemia, spleen size, and symptom burden were observed in pts receiving monotherapy and combo therapy. Dose expansion is ongoing for 6 mg and 10 mg monotherapy; ongoing dose escalation for combo therapy is expected to be completed, with data presentation at ASH 2024.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,008

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,272
Écart entre enseignants0,262 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and TreatmentTravaux en français237 207