MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4405045857 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-210392

Pre-Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT) Frailty Is Associated with Lower Cognitive Function and Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) in Older Adults Undergoing HCT

2024· article· en· W4405045857 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Thuy T. Koll, Megan Kerns, Tanya M. Wildes, Vijaya Raj Bhatt, Krishna Gundabolu, Lori J. Maness, Michael Haddadin, Marcia Free, Elizabeth Lyden, Daniel L. Murman, Alfred L. Fisher

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueFrailty in Older Adults
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineQuality of life (healthcare)GerontologyTransplantationCognitionPsychological interventionCohort studyCohortPhysical therapyInternal medicinePsychiatry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: Increasing numbers of older adults are undergoing HCT. Pre-HCT frailty is predictive of survival in older adults.1 However, an association between frailty and functional outcomes and HRQOL are unknown in older adults undergoing HCT. Examining potential associations is important to identify higher-risk HCT candidates who will benefit from proactive interventions and help patients and clinicians with treatment decision making. The objective of this study is to examine the association of pre-HCT frailty status with cognitive function and HRQOL at 12-months post-HCT in adults ≥ 60 years undergoing HCT. Methods: This study is a secondary data analysis of a longitudinal cohort study at a single center conducted between 2018-2022, that included adults ≥60 years who have a diagnosis of a hematologic malignancy undergoing HCT. Participants completed the Fried Frailty assessment, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and the European Quality of Life Questionnaire–Cancer 30 (QLQ-C30) prior to admission for HCT and at 12-months post-HCT. Frailty was defined as possessing three or more of the following: unintentional weight loss, low grip strength, self-reported exhaustion, slow gait speed, and low physical activity.2 Pre-frail was defined as having 1-2 of the criteria. Multinominal modeling with a random effect for subject was used to account for the correlation within patient, and to compare frailty status over time. ANOVA was used to compare 12-month post-HCT cognitive function and HRQOL between pre-HCT frailty statuses, and pair-wise comparisons were adjusted using Tukey's method. All analyses were done in SAS 9.4 and p <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: 104 older adults completed pre-HCT assessment. The average age at HCT was 67.7 years (range: 60.2-76.6). There were 69 (66.3%) allogeneic and 35 (33.7%) autologous HCT recipients. Pre-HCT, 10.6% were frail, 63.5% were pre-frail, and 26% were non-frail. At 12-months post-HCT (n=62), the prevalence of frail, pre-frail and non-frail were 25.8%, 67.7% and 6.5% respectively. There was a statistically significant increase in the prevalence of frailty between pre-HCT and 12 months post-HCT (odds ratio= 4.9, p= <0.001). Pre-HCT frailty status was associated with a lower 12-month MoCA score, and lower physical and emotional functioning on the QLQ-C30. The mean 12-month MoCA score for those who were frail pre-HCT was 23.4 compared to 26.2 and 25.4 for those who were pre-frail and non-frail, respectively (p=0.033). The mean score for the physical function sub-score on the QLQ-C30 at 12-month was 68.3 for patients who were frail pre-HCT compared to 83.9 and 83.2 for those who were pre-frail and non-frail, respectively (p=0.034). The mean score for the emotional function sub-score on the QLQ-C30 at 12-month was 76.1 for patients who were frail pre-HCT compared to 90.6 and 87.9 for those who were pre-frail and non-frail, respectively (p=0.034). Conclusions: Pre-HCT frailty is associated with lower cognitive performance and HRQOL at 12-months post-HCT, specifically physical and emotional functioning. At one year, the prevalence of frailty in HCT survivors approaches that of community dwelling older adults ≥ 80 years.3 The increased prevalence reflects the stress of cancer, accumulation of high-intensity therapeutic exposures, and transplant related morbidities. This study highlights the need to provide targeted interventions to mitigate and prevent frailty pre-HCT and early in the recovery process to preserve cognitive function and maximize HRQOL for older adults post-HCT. 1.Sung, A. D., Koll, T., Gier, S. H., Racioppi, A., White, G., Lew, M., ... & McCurdy, S. R. (2024). Preconditioning frailty phenotype influences survival and relapse for older allogeneic transplantation recipients. Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, 30(4), 415-e1. 2.Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, Seeman T, Tracy R, Kop WJ, Burke G, McBurnie MA; Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Mar;56(3):M146-56. PMID: 11253156. 3.Collard RM, Boter H, Schoevers RA, Oude Voshaar RC. Prevalence of frailty in community-dwelling older persons: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Aug;60(8):1487-92. PMID: 22881367.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,009
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,018

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,281
Écart entre enseignants0,259 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetFrailty in Older Adults→Travaux en français237 207→