MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4405046397 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-193453

Use of Fidanacogene Elaparvovec, a Gene Therapy Vector, to Deliver a Stable, Fully Functional Human Factor IX Transgene for the Treatment of Hemophilia B: A Combined Analysis of Safety

2024· article· en· W4405046397 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Ben Samelson-Jones, Laurent Frenzel, Kaan Kavaklı, Adam Cuker, Jerome Teitel, Pengling Sun, Lisa J. Wilcox, Francesca Biondo, Benjamin Hutter, John McKay, Delphine Agathon, Frank Plonski

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueVirus-based gene therapy research
Établissements canadiensPfizer (Canada)University of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineAdverse effectFactor IXInternal medicineDosingAlanine transaminaseGenetic enhancementTransaminaseGastroenterologyAdeno-associated virusPhases of clinical researchClinical trialSurgeryRecombinant DNAVector (molecular biology)Biology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background Fidanacogene elaparvovec is a non-replicating, recombinant, liver-tropic, adeno-associated virus-based (rAAV) gene therapy that transfers a high-activity variant of human factor IX (FIX) FIX-R338L for the treatment of hemophilia B (HB). Data from a phase 1/2a fidanacogene elaparvovec trial and its long-term follow-up (LTFU) demonstrated sustained FIX activity in the mild hemophilia to normal range, with low bleeding rates and a reduction in FIX infusions up to 6 years post dosing. In the ongoing, phase 3 BENEGENE-2 trial, fidanacogene elaparvovec resulted in FIX activity levels in the mild hemophilia to normal range and a reduction in annualized bleeding rate up to 4 years post dosing. Fidanacogene elaparvovec was recently approved for use in Canada, the United States, and Europe. As a novel therapeutic modality, the long-term safety of rAAV hemophilia gene therapies is unknown. To address this, we report a combined analysis of fidanacogene elaparvovec safety across its clinical development. Methods Data from the phase 1/2a trial (NCT02484092, completed), its LTFU study (NCT03307980, cutoff August 15, 2023), and the BENEGENE-2 trial (NCT03861273, cutoff August 30, 2023) were included. Men ≥18 years with HB (FIX ≤2%) received a single intravenous infusion of 5×1011 vg/kg fidanacogene elaparvovec. Patients with AAV capsid neutralizing antibodies, baseline alanine transaminase (ALT) or aspartate transaminase (AST) >2× upper limit of normal (ULN) or bilirubin >1.5× ULN were excluded. Safety endpoints included adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) in the first year post dosing. In the subsequent follow-up after Year 1, non-serious gene therapy-related AEs were reported together with SAEs. AEs of special interest (hypersensitivity reactions, thrombotic events, FIX inhibitors, hepatic malignancies, elevated transaminases), clinical laboratory results, and hepatic evaluations were included. Participants were followed for up to 6 years. Results Data from 60 unique participants (phase 1/2a, n=15 dosed; LTFU for those dosed in phase 1/2a, n=14; BENEGENE-2, n=45 dosed) who received fidanacogene elaparvovec were included. The median follow-up duration was 5.8 (range 1-6) years for phase 1/2a and its LTFU and 2.8 (range 1.2-4.0) years for BENEGENE-2. The total safety experience was based on 204.8 participant-years of follow-up. All participants have >1 year of follow-up, 54 (90%) >2 years, and 29 (48%) >3 years. Most participants had severe HB (80% with FIX activity <1%), 75% were White, with median age of 30.5 (range 18-62) years, and median body mass index (BMI) 28 (range 18-48) kg/m2 at baseline. In the first year of follow-up, 52/60 (87%) participants had AEs and 5 (8%) had SAEs. The most frequently reported AEs were increased ALT (n=12 [20%]; mild, n=9; moderate, n=3) and nasopharyngitis (n=11 [18%]; mild, n=8; moderate, n=3). In the total follow-up period, 52/60 (87%) participants had AEs and 11 (18%) had SAEs. The most frequently reported AE was increased ALT (n=12 [20%]) and SAE of anemia (n=2 [3%]). Age, BMI and geographic region had no impact on the incidence of AEs. In the first year of follow-up, 31/60 (52%) participants were treated with corticosteroids for increased transaminases and/or decreased FIX levels (median duration 98 [range, 41-276] days). All corticosteroid treatments were completed within 1 year post gene therapy. No participants initiated corticosteroid treatment after 1 year. With up to 6 years' follow-up, there have been no FIX inhibitors or hepatic malignancies, and no gene therapy-related elevated transaminases that failed to improve/resolve with immunosuppressive treatment. Overall, 11 (18%) participants had mild-to-moderate events within the scope of hypersensitivity; no acute hypersensitivity events or infusion-related reactions were assessed as related to fidanacogene elaparvovec. There were no deaths or discontinuations due to an AE. Liver ultrasounds from Year 1 of the LTFU study onwards showed 4 participants had steatosis and 1 had cirrhosis; 1 participant in BENEGENE-2 had hepatic stenosis/polycystic kidney disease and 1 had a polyp in the gall bladder. None of these findings were considered related to gene therapy. Conclusions This combined analysis demonstrates the favorable safety profile of fidanacogene elaparvovec in the largest dataset with the longest follow-up for an HB gene therapy. LTFU will continue for up to 15 years.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,008

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,048
Tête enseignante GPT0,302
Écart entre enseignants0,254 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetVirus-based gene therapy research→Travaux en français237 207→