The Incidence and Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Active Malignancy and Isolated Superficial Venous Thrombosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (The IROVAM-iSVT review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: The management of cancer-associated isolated superficial venous thrombosis (iSVT) remains a challenge. Some studies have demonstrated up to 25% of patients with active malignancy develop either deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) one year post iSVT. However, guidelines do not provide specific recommendation for patients with active malignancy and iSVT. Thus, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the incidence and risk of subsequent VTE in patients with iSVT and active malignancy, with the aim to support clinical decision-making. Methods: PRISMA reporting guidelines were followed, and this study's protocol was pre-registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024550983). Medline and Embase were searched from inception to April 22nd, 2024, without language or geographic restrictions, using keywords “superficial venous thrombosis” and “superficial vein thrombosis”. All studies investigating the prevalence, incidence, odds, or risk of subsequent DVT or PE in adult (>18 years) patients with active malignancy diagnosed with iSVT were included. This study's primary outcome was to determine the incidence of VTE (PE or proximal DVT) in patients with active malignancy and iSVT and compare this incidence to patients with iSVT without active malignancy. Our secondary outcomes were to determine the incidence of major bleeding, clinically relevant non major bleeding (CRNMB), hospitalization, and death. Using R software (version 4.4.0), incidence rates, odds ratios, and risk ratios were pooled, separately, using random effects model. Incidence was expressed as events per 100 patient years with associated 95% confidence interval (CI). If necessary, the incidence of VTE was calculated and was defined as the combined number of proximal DVTs and PEs in each study divided by the number of patient years in that study. Results: Of 1172 records, 8 full-text studies were included totalling 5998 patients, 448 with active malignancy and iSVT. Follow-up across studies was most reported at 3 months post iSVT, with some studies reporting follow-up at up to 1 year. The overall incidence of VTE in patients with active malignancy was 18.2 events per 100 patient years (95% CI 5.2 to 31.2, I2=76%). Across studies, patients with active malignancy and SVT had a higher rate of VTE compared to patients with SVT without active malignancy (RR 2.57, 95% CI 1.78-3.71, I2=0%, P<0.001). Four studies reported the incidence of major bleeding in patients with active malignancy and iSVT. Of these patients, there were 2 major bleeding events per 100 patient years (95% CI 0 to 6.7, I2=59%). Only one study reported CRNMB, with an incidence of 2.6 events per 100 patient years (2 of 77 patients). Only one study reported hospitalization rates. Patients with active malignancy and iSVT had a higher risk of hospitalization due to VTE compared to patients with iSVT without active malignancy (HR 8.87, 95% CI 2.12-37.12, P=0.003), with 3.9% of patients requiring hospitalisation. One study also found patients with iSVT with active malignancy had 10-fold higher risk of death compared to patients with iSVT without active malignancy (RR 10, 95% CI 3.45 to 25, p<0.001). Compared to patients with iSVT without active malignancy, across studies, there were no significant difference in the number of patients treated with anticoagulation or the duration of anticoagulation. Conclusion: The rate of VTE is high post iSVT in patients with active malignancy despite treatment. Thus, future studies should investigate the role of extended duration anticoagulation on rates of VTE in this population.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,008 | 0,023 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,012 | 0,022 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,007 | 0,008 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».