MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4405046828 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-204178

Comparison of Prophylactic and Therapeutic Platelet Transfusion Strategies in Manitoba: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2024· article· en· W4405046828 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Andrea A. Pérez Soriano, Brett L. Houston, Neelan Sriranjan, Emily Rimmer, Donald S. Houston, Ryan Zarychanski, Kristjan Paulson, Olawale F. Ayilara, Tyler M. Moore

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueBlood transfusion and management
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British ColumbiaCancerCare ManitobaUniversity of Manitoba
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineRetrospective cohort studyPlatelet transfusionBlood transfusionCohortPlateletInternal medicineIntensive care medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background:Autologous bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is associated with severe thrombocytopenia, yet optimal use of platelet transfusions is unclear. Subgroup analyses from prior trials1,2 demonstrated no difference in major bleeding among patients treated with prophylactic (to prevent bleeding) or therapeutic (to treat bleeding) platelet transfusion strategies, although total blood product use was reduced when a therapeutic approach was used. Guidelines suggest avoiding prophylactic platelet transfusions in autologous BMT in the absence of bleeding3,4, yet there has been variable uptake of a therapeutic platelet transfusion strategy among centres performing autologous BMT. In 2018 we adopted a policy of therapeutic rather than prophylactic platelet transfusion among patients undergoing autologous BMT; our prior policy was to prophylactically transfuse when the platelet count fell below 10x109/L. We compared bleeding outcomes and overall blood product utilization among patients undergoing autologous BMT treated before and after our change in platelet transfusion policy. Methods:We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all adult patients undergoing autologous BMT for hematologic malignancy in Manitoba, CAN from 2013-2022. Patients were identified, and demographic and clinical information were obtained from the Manitoba Blood and Marrow Transplant Program registry. Hospital records were reviewed to assess bleeding frequency and severity using the modified World Health Organization bleeding scale5. Transfusion data were obtained from the provincial transfusion database. Transplants conducted before and after June 2018 defined our ‘pre’ and ‘post’ cohort, respectively. Baseline characteristics were summarized as means (standard deviation [SD]), medians (interquartile range [IQR]) or frequency (percent), as appropriate. Logistic regression was performed to assess differences in WHO grade 2+ bleeding, controlling for age, sex, comorbidity score, diagnosis, conditioning regimen, number of days with platelet count <10x109/L, proportion of ‘at risk days’ (days with platelet count <10x109/L) on which platelet transfusion was received, and pre/post prophylactic platelet transfusion protocol implementation status. Results:Of the 320 patients who underwent autologous BMT, 172 (54%) and 148 (46%) patients were in the pre- and post-cohort, respectively. The mean overall age was 56 (SD 12) years, and 60% were male. Lymphoma (58%, n=187) and plasma cell dyscrasias (41%, n=132) were the most common indications for transplant. The median duration of hospitalization was 19 days (IQR 17, 23) in the pre-cohort compared to 23 days (IQR 20, 29) in the post-cohort. The mean number of platelet transfusions per hospitalization was 2.8 (SD 4.2) units pre- and 2.5 (2.7) units post- policy change. The mean number of red blood cell transfusions per hospitalization was 3.4 (SD 4.4) units pre- and 2.7 (SD 2.2) units post- policy change. The mean number of days with a platelet count <10x109/L was 1 (SD 1.5) day in the pre- and 3.5 (SD 3) days in the post-cohort. Bleeding was more common post- policy change compared to pre- policy change (70% vs. 42%; p<0.01). Most bleeding events in the pre-cohort were grade 1 (27%; n=20) or grade 2 (68%; n=50); only one patient experienced a grade 3 bleed. Grade 1 bleeds included epistaxis (55%), oropharyngeal (25%), and petechiae (20%). The most common grade 2 bleeds were PICC-associated (66%) and gastrointestinal (20%). Most bleeding events in the post- cohort were also grade 1 (41%; n=43) or grade 2 (58%); only one patient experienced a grade 3 bleed. The grade 1 bleeds included epistaxis (53%), oropharyngeal (19%) and petechiae (12%). The most common grade 2 bleeds were PICC-associated (40%) and gastrointestinal (22%). The average number of days with bleeding per hospitalization was 1.5 (SD 1.3) days and 1.5 (SD 1.5) days in the pre- and post-cohorts, respectively. On multivariate analysis, post-policy change was not associated with an increase in grade 2+ bleeding (OR 1.43, 95% CI 0.72, 2.84). Conclusion: A therapeutic platelet transfusion strategy among patients undergoing autologous BMT for hematologic malignancy was associated with increased grade 1 and 2 bleeding, with minimal impact on platelet product utilization. Grade 3 or more bleeding events were uncommon, regardless of the platelet transfusion strategy.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,641
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,713

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,005
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,303
Écart entre enseignants0,280 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetBlood transfusion and management→Travaux en français237 207→