MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4405046844 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-206096

R289, a Dual Irak 1/4 Inhibitor, in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (LR-MDS): Initial Results from a Phase 1b Study

2024· article· en· W4405046844 sur OpenAlexfundno aff
Guillermo Garcia‐Manero, Yazan F. Madanat, Mikkael A. Sekeres, Hetty E. Carraway, Mike Cusnir, James McCloskey, Kiran Naqvi, Gary J. Schiller, Lucy Yan, Toufigh Gordi, Lisa Rojkjaer, Lewis R. Silverman

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesGenentechSierra OncologyIncyteSwedish Orphan BiovitrumAstex PharmaceuticalsJazz PharmaceuticalsMorphoSysCelgeneBristol-Myers SquibbHelsinnServierAmgen
Mots-clésMedicineInternal medicineRefractory (planetary science)Myelodysplastic syndromesLenalidomideOncologyGastroenterologyBone marrowBiologyMultiple myeloma

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: Interleukin receptor-associated kinases (IRAK) 1 and 4 are critical for downstream signaling of IL-1R family and most toll-like receptors (TLR), promoting proinflammatory cytokine production, bone marrow inflammation and cell death. In addition, IRAK 1/4 exhibit complementary and compensatory dependencies via MyD88-independent pathways in MDS and acute myeloid leukemia, inhibiting hematopoietic cell differentiation. Co-targeting both IRAK 1/4 may be necessary to maximally suppress inflammation and leukemic stem/progenitor cell function and restore hematopoiesis in MDS. R835 is a selective dual inhibitor of IRAK 1/4 that blocks TLR4 and IL-1R-dependent cytokine release in vitro and in vivo. We report the initial dose escalation results from a phase 1b, open-label, single arm dose escalation/expansion study evaluating the safety and preliminary activity of the oral IRAK 1/4 inhibitor R289, a prodrug of R835, in LR-MDS pts (NCT05308264). Methods: Eligible pts were ≥18 years of age with R/R LR-MDS [very low, low, or intermediate-risk per the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R)] and either symptomatic anemia (hemoglobin ≤9.0 g/dL) and no RBC transfusions within the prior 16 weeks (wks) [non-TD (NTD)] or TD-anemia [≥2 units (u) RBCs within 8 wks during the 16-wk pre-enrollment period]. Baseline (BL) RBC transfusion burden (TB) within 16 wks prior to study treatment was defined as high (HTB, ≥8 u RBCs) or low (LTB, 3-7 u RBCs). Those with del (5q) must be R/R to lenalidomide. A 3+3 design was used to determine the maximum tolerated dose or recommended dose for expansion. Primary/secondary objectives were safety/PK and preliminary efficacy, respectively. R289 was administered orally in 28-day cycles (250 mg QD, 500 mg QD, 750 mg QD, 250 mg BID). Hematologic improvement-erythroid (HI-E) responses were assessed per IWG 2018 criteria and other responses per IWG 2006 criteria, starting at week 8. Results: As of the data cutoff date (15 July 2024),19 pts were enrolled [IPSS-R score: very low (n=4, 21%), low (n=9, 47%), intermediate (n=6, 32%)]. Median age was 76 (range 50-83); 68% were males. Most pts had MDS with multilineage dysplasia [n=7, (37%)]. The median number of prior therapies was 4 (range 1-8). Prior therapies included luspatercept [n=15 (79%)], hypomethylating agent (HMA) [n=15 (79%)]. At BL, 15 pts (79%) were HTB, 2 pts (11%) were LTB, and 2 pts (11%) were non-TD. Mean BL absolute neutrophil count (ANC) was 2.52 × 109/L; 3 pts (16%) had an ANC <1 × 109/L. Mean BL platelet count was 153 × 109/L [<100 × 109/L in 4 pts (21%)]. The most frequent (≥20%) treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were diarrhea and fatigue (both n=5; 26%) and nausea (n=4; 21%); all grade (G)1/2. The most frequent G3/4 AEs were pneumonia, anemia, ALT increase and upper GI hemorrhage (all n=2; 10%). Two pts discontinued therapy due to an AE. At doses ≥500 mg QD, R835 plasma concentrations at steady state reached or exceeded concentrations correlating with 50% (n=6) or 90% (n=3) LPS-induced cytokine inhibition as observed in HV. Fourteen of 19 pts were evaluable for efficacy (received ≥1 dose of study drug with ≥1 efficacy assessment) at the data cutoff; 1 pt withdrew due to an AE, 4 had < 8 wks follow-up (too early to evaluate for response). No responses occurred at 250 mg QD (n=3). Three pts achieved RBC-transfusion independence (RBC-TI) ≥8 wks: 1/6 at 500 mg QD and 2/5 at 750 mg QD. The median duration of RBC-TI was 29 wks (range 12.4-35.9 wks). RBC-TI >24 wks was achieved in 2 HTB pts (28.9 and 35.9 wks) following 3 and 5 prior therapies, including an HMA. One HTB pt at 500 mg QD had a minor HI-E response. One LTB pt achieving TI (750 mg QD) also attained a marrow complete response (BL blasts: 4%). Conclusions: At data cutoff, R289 was well-tolerated in this heavily pretreated LR-MDS patient population, the majority of whom were HTB. The incidence of G3/4 cytopenias and infections was low. Preliminary efficacy data suggest an on-target biologic drug effect, with RBC-TI/HI-E responses occurring in 36% of patients receiving R289 doses ≥500 mg QD. The responses were durable (>24 weeks) in 2 HTB pts thus far. Further evaluation of 250 mg BID and a 500/250 mg daily split dose is ongoing. An expansion cohort is planned to confirm a recommended phase 2 dose.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,006

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,290
Écart entre enseignants0,274 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations7
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetMultiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsTravaux en français237 207