MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4405048013 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-209053

A Hgb Exceeding 120g/L Does Not Increase Risk of Vascular Complications or Disease Progression in Patients with MDS Treated with Erythropoietic Stimulating Agents, a Single-Institution Retrospective Study of the MDS-CAN Registry

2024· article· en· W4405048013 sur OpenAlexaff
Clarissa Skorupski, Lisa Chodirker, Lee Mozessohn, James T. England, Theodore A. Kennedy, Matthew C. Cheung, Signy Chow, Jennifer Teichman, Nicola Goldberg, Samantha Hershenfeld, Hubert Tsui, Mohammed Siddiqui, Alexandre Mamedov, Liying Zhang, Rena Buckstein

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueErythropoietin and Anemia Treatment
Établissements canadiensHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentreUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineAnemiaInternal medicineLogistic regressionIncidence (geometry)Retrospective cohort studyLog-rank testSurgerySurvival analysis

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background Erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) are recommended for management of anemia in lower-risk MDS to ameliorate anemia related symptoms and prevent blood transfusions. However, drug cessation/reduction once hemoglobin (Hgb) levels exceed 115-120g/L is mandated based on evidence extrapolated from ESA studies in chronic renal disease and non-hematologic malignancies that suggests elevated risks of cardiovascular and thrombotic complications and inferior disease free survival at higher Hgb levels. These recommendations exist despite a lack of evidence supporting similar relationships with ESA use in MDS, and compelling data supporting improvements in patient-reported quality of life at higher Hgb levels. Objectives Our study objectives were to 1) compare the incidence, and risk factors associated with, arterial and venous thrombotic events experienced by MDS patients while treated with ESAs, who either achieved Hgb levels >120g/L or did not; 2) compare overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) in these patient groups. Methods We retrospectively evaluated single-center data extracted from the prospective MDS-CAN registry. Patients with MDS who were treated with ESAs and achieved a Hgb level of >120g/L at any time were included. Baseline demographic, ESA, and laboratory information were collected. The vascular complication rates of those achieving a Hgb of >120 were calculated. Logistic regression analysis was used to compare the characteristics of the patients that did or did not have these complications. Kaplan-Meier OS and LFS curves were also compared by log-rank test in patients who achieved or did not achieve a Hgb of >120 g/L at any time. Results A total of 291 patients received ESAs for whom serial Hgbs were available. Of these, 87 (29.9%) patients achieved Hgb levels >120g/L at one or more times while on ESA treatment and were included for analysis of vascular events. 65 (74.7%) patients were treated with Epoietin, 14 (16.1%) with Darbepoetin, and 8 (9.2%) received both. Median maximum doses of Epoietin and Darbepoietin were 40,000 (IQR 40,000 - 60,000) and 500 (IQR 500 - 500) units respectively. 57 (65.2%) patients were male and the median age at start of ESA treatment was 76.3 years (IQR 66.3 - 81.5). The IPSS-R categories at ESA start were very low (17.7%), low (45.2%), intermediate (30.6%), high (4.9%), and very high (1.6%). The median time to ESA start from MDS diagnosis was 5.1 months (IQR 1.45 - 20.21), and median length of time on ESA was 37.0 months (IQR 14.88 - 78.16). The median Hgb while on ESA was 110g/L with 16 (18.4%) patients maintaining a median Hgb >120g/L during ESA treatment. Among these 87 patients, 11 (12.6%) developed a new vascular event on therapy at a median time of 54.8 months (IQR 23.6 - 74.1) from ESA start, of which 8 (9.2%) were arterial and 3 (3.5%) were venous events. The median closest Hgb immediately preceding the event was 95g/L (IQR 88.0 - 107.0). In univariate logistic regression analysis, only a previous history of vascular events was significantly related to the development of a new vascular complication (p=0.006, OR 6.7, 95% CI 1.9-29.4). On study median Hgb and other baseline clinical/laboratory characteristics were not predictive. The actuarial OS since ESA treatment start for these 87 patients was 70.5 months (95% CI 51.9 - 94.2) and did not differ between patients with a median Hgb >120g/L or <120g/L (70.5 vs. 75.5 months, p=0.93). The actuarial LFS was 69.5 months (95% CI 51.9 - 82.7) and did not differ between the patients with a median Hgb >120g/L or <120g/L (75.5 vs. 66.9 months, p = 0.83). Finally, in comparison to 204 MDS patients on ESA treatment who did not ever achieve a Hgb >120g/L, the 87 patients who achieved a Hgb >120g/L had a statistically significant improvement in actuarial median OS (35.7 vs. 70.5 months, p=0.002) and LFS (31.5 vs. 69.5 months, p = 0.0006). Conclusion Out of 87 MDS patients treated with ESAs who achieved a Hgb >120g/L, 11 developed a new vascular event, but the Hgb preceding the event was <100g/L. A previous history of vascular events was the only significant predictive risk factor suggesting Hgb levels do not correlate with new vascular complications. Notably, patients who achieved a Hgb >120g/L on ESA had improved OS compared to those with a Hgb <120g/L without any increase in leukemia. A propensity matched analysis comparing vascular event incidence, OS, and LFS in patients with Hgb levels >120g/L or <120g/L will be completed.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,004
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,008

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,269
Écart entre enseignants0,254 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetErythropoietin and Anemia TreatmentTravaux en français237 207