MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4405049288 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-205817

The Use of Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide Leads to Increased Cardiac Complications without Affecting Survival in Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation

2024· article· en· W4405049288 sur OpenAlexaff
Tommy Alfaro, Nihar Desai, María Queralt Salas, Carol Chen, Armin Gerbitz, Dong Hwan Kim, Rajat Kumar, Wilson Lam, Arjun Law, Jeffrey H. Lipton, Fotios V. Michelis, Igor Novitzky‐Basso, Jonas Mattsson, Auro Viswabandya

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueTransplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Établissements canadiensUniversity Health NetworkPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTransplantationStem cellMedicineCyclophosphamideInternal medicineImmunologyChemotherapyBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Post transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY) has broadened the access to allogeneic stem cell transplantation. However, it is also associated with increased organ toxicity and infections in these patients. We intended to determine whether the occurrence of cardiac events (CE) after the use of PTCY has an impact in the outcomes of patients undergoing haploidentical transplantation (haplo-HCT). We analyzed the outcomes of 157 patients who underwent peripheral blood haplo-HCT between August 2016 and December 2021 at Princess Margaret Hospital. All the patients received PTCY 50 mg/kg on D+3, +4 in combination with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) and cyclosporine, our standard GVHD prophylaxis regimen for recipients of haplo-HCT. We defined a CE as any new episode of arrythmia, heart failure, drop in the LVEF of more than 10% below 53%, myocardial ischemia, and pericarditis/pericardial effusion occurring after the stem cell infusion. Hypertension (HTN) was not considered a pre or post transplant CE. The cumulative incidence (CumI) of CE was estimated accounting for death and relapse as competing events. The median age for the cohort was 57 years (range: 18-73), and 67 (44%) patients were 60 years or older. Fifty patients had a diagnosis of HTN, 28 had diabetes mellitus, 36 had dyslipidemia, and 30 patients had prior cardiac history (pre-transplant arrhythmia, coronary artery disease, valvular disease or pericardial disease). Acute myeloid leukemia was the most prevalent baseline diagnosis (n = 79, 50.3%), and 38 (24.2%) patients received myeloablative conditioning regimens. Total body irradiation (TBI) was used in 126 patients, 12 received 12Gy and 114 received 200 cGy. Forty-six (30%) adults had a KPS ≤ 80%, 46 (30%) had an HCT-CI score >3, and 34 (23.4%) had a high or very-high disease risk index. Eighteen patients (12.7%) experienced a CE during their follow up, and in a median of 36 (range 1-623 days, interquartile range 20-63 days) days after haplo-HCT. Eight (5%) patients experienced arrhythmia, 7 (4.4%) experienced symptomatic heart failure or a drop in the LVEF >10% to below 53%and 3 (1.9%) patients experienced pericardial effusions. The CumI of CE was observed to be 8.3% (95% CI 4.6-13.3) at 100 days, 9.6% (95% CI 5.6-14.8) at 180 days, and 10.2% (95% CI 6.1-15.6) at 1-year. We analyzed the incidence of cardiac events between patients with a history of a pre-existing cardiac disorder and those without a cardiac history. The CumI was significantly higher in patients with a pre-existing cardiac condition, recorded at 17.6% (95% CI 8.9-35.6) at 180 days, compared to 7.3% (95% CI 3.6-12.8) in those without such issues (p = 0.007). HTN had no impact on CE, no significant difference was found between hypertensive and non-hypertensive patients, with the CumI remaining similar across both groups (D+180 10% vs 10.2% respectively, p=0.9). Age did not appear to significantly affect the incidence of CE, with similar outcomes reported for patients over 60 years and those under 60 (D+180 10.3%, 95% CI 4.5-18.8 vs 9%, 95% CI 4.2-16.1, p=0.77). A trend towards higher CE incidence was observed in patients who received higher ATG dose (4.5mg/kg) when compared with patients receiving a lower dose of 2mg/kg (D+180 10.8% vs. 5.4, p=0.13). Furthermore, the role of TBI was explored, revealing a higher CumI of CE by D+180 in patients who received TBI (10.3%, 95% CI 5.8-16.4) compared to those who did not (6.5%, 95% CI 1.2-18.9), p=0.25. Fifteen cardiac events occurred in the group who received 2 Gy and 1 in the group who received 12 Gy. Overall survival at 12 months was 55.6% (95% CI 30.5-74.8) for patients experiencing CE versus 59% (95% CI 50.3-66.6) for those without CE, p=0.92. Non-relapse mortality (NRM) did not significantly differ between the groups at 1 year, with NRM of 33.3% (95% CI 13.1-55.3) vs. 30.9% (95% CI 23.4-38.7) for patients who experienced a cardiac event vs those who didn't respectively, p=0.55. Our study reports an incidence of CE of 12.7% following haplo-HCT with PTCY/ATG-based prophylaxis. Despite this, patients were successfully treated, and the diagnosis of this complication did not significantly impact transplant outcomes. Given the morbidity associated with these complications as noted in previous publications, the conduction of studies aimed at optimizing dosages and drug combinations when using PTCY-based prophylaxis will be desirable, especially for patients with a prior cardiac history.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,003

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,033
Tête enseignante GPT0,303
Écart entre enseignants0,271 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetTransplantation: Methods and Outcomes→Travaux en français237 207→