MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4405049414 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-211615

Real-World Efficacy of Belumosudil in Treating Fibrotic Symptom Burden in Chronic Gvhd: Modified Lee Symptom Score Assessment after Multiple Treatment Failures

2024· article· en· W4405049414 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Nihar Desai, Arjun Law, Christopher Lemieux, Keven Vachon, Kareem Jamani, Mohamed Elemary, Auro Viswabandya, Rajat Kumar, Jonas Mattsson, Dennis Dong Hwan Kim

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueInterstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Établissements canadiensSaskatchewan Cancer AgencyUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversité LavalPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineInternal medicineIntensive care medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: Belumosudil (BEL), a selective Rho-associated coiled-coil kinase 2 (ROCK2) inhibitor, has demonstrated clinical efficacy in managing chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD), particularly its fibrotic component. The modified Lee Symptom Score (mLSS) is a practical tool for evaluating symptom burden. While real-world clinical studies indicate improved responses overall, the effect of BEL in reversing fibrosis is unclear. BEL has been available in Canada since March 2023 under a compassionate use program. Herein, we present our preliminary data on serial changes in mLSS, clinical response rates, and failure-free survival (FFS) following BEL treatment. Methods and patients: This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy of BEL in 37 patients enrolled in the compassionate program from 4 Canadian centers (Toronto, Quebec City, Saskatoon, and Calgary) from March 2023 - July 2024. Baseline characteristics, prior treatments received, and details of BEL treatment were captured in addition to overall response rates (ORRs), mLSS, treatment outcomes, and adverse events. The 7-day mLSS was serially captured as the standard of care in the clinic in 28 patients at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The summary score and sum of 7 domains (i.e. skin, eye/mouth, breathing, eating/digestion, muscle/joints, energy, and mental/emotional) as well as the fibrotic sum score (FSS; defined as the sum of the score for limited joint movement, difficulty swallowing solids and liquids, and thickened skin) were calculated at each time point and compared with the score from baseline using a repeated measure based on general linear model (GLM). Repeated measure analysis using a GLM assessed serial changes mLSS at 4-time points, examining within-subjects and between-subjects effects, respectively. Clinically meaningful improvement in overall mLSS was defined as a reduction of mLSS ≥ 7 points, while for a domain a reduction of the sum by ≥2 was clinically meaningful. For the fibrotic component of cGvHD, a reduction of the FSS by ≥2 was considered clinically meaningful. Failure-free Survival (FFS) was defined as the time from starting BEL to the addition of new GVHD therapy, relapse, or death. Results: Thirty-seven patients were treated with BEL, and 27 were evaluated for response with a minimum follow-up of 3 months. At the time of starting BEL, 25 (67.5%) patients had severe grade cGvHD, with a median of 4 (1-4) affected organs, and had received a median of 5 (2-10) prior lines of therapy. The median duration from cGvHD onset to BEL was 41 months (9-150). Corticosteroids were the most common concurrent treatment with BEL (n=20, 56%), and 13 (36%) patients were treated with a combination of BEL and ruxolitinib. With a median follow-up of 10.1 months (2-17) after BEL, the ORR at 3 and 6 months was 55.0% (n=15/27) and 69% (n=11/16). The corticosteroid dose was reduced from baseline in 9 (45%) patients. The 6-month FFS was 71.9%. Five patients discontinued treatment (n=2 for intolerance to BEL; n=2, GvHD progression requiring additional treatment; n=1, mortality due to pre-existing infection). The mLSS score showed a statistically significant reduction over time (p=0.04 by repeated measure by GLM): 28.7 ± 2.4 (mean ± S.E.), 22.9 ± 2.9, and 20.9 ± 4.2 at baseline, 3, and 6 months. When compared to baseline, the mLSS was reduced by 6.6 ± 1.3, 7.8 ± 1.8, 11.4 ± 5.0, and 15.8±4.5 at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The proportions of patients showing clinically meaningful improvement of the mLSS (≥7 points) at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months were 59%, 75%, 60% and 100%. Over 30% of patients showed clinically meaningful improvement (≥2 points) in skin, eyes/mouth, breathing, and joint/muscle domains. In terms of the FSS, it showed a statistically significant reduction over time (p=0.002 by repeated measure by GLM): 4.3±0.6 (mean ± S.E.), 3.5±0.6, 4.1±0.8 and 3.2±1.1 at baseline, 3, 6 and 9 months. In comparison to the FSS from baseline, the FSS was reduced by 1.4±0.5, 1.6±0.8, 3.8±0.6 and 3.2±0.6 at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Conclusion: The current study replicated a similar ORR of 69% compared to the previously reported best ORR in the ROCKstar study (74%). Also, our study showed a significant improvement in symptom burden based on the mLSS and the FSS over time. This highlights the importance of longitudinal monitoring of the mLSS as a follow-up tool, particularly for the fibrotic/sclerotic nature of cGvHD.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,020
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,041

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,291
Écart entre enseignants0,277 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2024
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetInterstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis→Travaux en français237 207→