MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4405049996 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-201631

Major Bleeding Post-Renal Transplant in Anticoagulated Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2024· article· en· W4405049996 sur OpenAlexaff
Bisan Shweikialrefaee, Joseph Kim, Jameel Abdulrehman

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueRenal and Vascular Pathologies
Établissements canadiensUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkMcGill University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineRetrospective cohort studyRenal transplantCohortSurgeryInternal medicineTransplantation

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: Renal transplantation (RT) is the preferred treatment for end-stage kidney disease, but is associated with a high risk of bleeding, particularly in patients on chronic anticoagulation (AC). Peri-procedural AC management is challenging, as early resumption may decrease the thrombosis risk but could increase the bleeding risk. Unfortunately, data regarding the effect of peri-procedural AC on bleeding outcomes in RT is very limited. Objectives: The primary objective was to describe the risk of major bleeding (MB) in patients on chronic AC and not on chronic AC. The secondary objectives were (1) to identify patient characteristics associated with MB (2) to describe the following risks, and specifically based on post-RT (PRT) day AC restart in those on chronic AC (i) MB (ii) thrombosis (iii) graft loss (iv) all-cause mortality. Methods: This is an interim analysis of a single center retrospective cohort study included consecutive adult RT patients from June 01, 2011, to June 30, 2020. Patients with known congenital bleeding disorders, multiple organ transplant, and previous RT were excluded. Patients were identified through the Comprehensive RT Research Information System and the Organ Transplant Tracking Record databases. Baseline characteristics and study outcomes were collected from the database and the electronic patient record. Patients were followed for outcomes from day 0 to 30 PRT. The AC group included those on chronic therapeutic AC who were restarted on AC within 30 days PRT and does not include AC intended solely for VTE prophylaxis. MB was defined as per a modified International Society on Hemostasis and Thrombosis criteria. Thrombosis included both arterial thromboembolism (ATE) and VTE. Graft loss was defined as graft failure requiring renal replacement therapy. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were summarized using descriptive statistics. Results From 800 patients screened, 590 patients met eligibility criteria and were included in the study. The median age was 52 (standard deviation 13.8) years and 242 (41%) were female. The majority of RT were from a deceased donor (n=369, 62.5%). Prior MB and thrombosis occurred in 36 (6.1%) and 28 (4.7%) respectively. Approximately a quarter of patients (n=167, 28.3%) were on antiplatelet therapy prior to RT. Twenty-four (4.1%) were on AC prior to RT, however, only 21 (3.6%) patients were restarted on AC within 30-day PRT and were included in the AC group. The most common AC PRT was warfarin (n=17, 80.1 %), followed by LMWH (n=2, 9.5%) and direct oral AC (n=2, 9.5%), and the most common AC indication was atrial fibrillation (n=10, 47.6%) followed by VTE (n=8, 38.1%%). AC was restarted in the AC group on the following days: 7 patients < 3 days PRT, 10 patients on days 4 to 7 PRT, and 4 patients after day 7 PRT. Eight (38.1.% (95% confidence interval (CI) 21.8 to 59.1)) in the AC group had MB, compared to 146 (25.7% (95% CI 22.2 to 29.4)) in the no AC group. The most common types of MB in the AC and no AC groups were renal (n=4 (50%) and n=85 (58.2%)), and no identified source (n=3 (37.5%) and n=48 (32.9%)), respectively. Among all patients with MB, 78.6% (95% CI 71.4 to 84.3) had hypertension, 51.3% (95% CI 43.5 to 59.1) were male, 36.4% (95% CI 29.2 to 44.2) had diabetes, and 33.8% (95% CI 26.8 to 41.6) were on antiplatelet therapy. In the AC group, prior to restarting AC, four patients had MB on days 0, 1, 4 and 10 and were later restarted on AC on days 10, 4, 5 and 14 respectively. The rest of the MB in the AC group occurred after restarting AC on days 2, 3, 5 and 7 with MB on days 8, 9, 10 and 10 respectively. One (4.8 % (95% CI 0.8 to 22.7)) of the patients in the AC group developed thrombosis, a VTE on day 13 PRT, on subtherapeutic warfarin (INR= 1.34). Twenty (3.5 % (95% CI 2.3 to 5.4)) patients in the no AC group had thrombosis, including 17 (85%) VTE and 3 (15 %) ATE. There was no graft loss or mortality in the AC group, but 2 (0.4 % (95% CI 0.1 to 1.3)) and 3 (0.5% (95% CI 0.2 to 1.5)) in the no AC group respectively Conclusion MB is common PRT, especially in those on chronic AC. Patients on chronic AC may be high bleeding risk at baseline, even prior to restarting AC PRT. Prospective data is needed to devise evidence-based strategies to guide peri-RT AC.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,006
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,406

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,252
Écart entre enseignants0,242 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetRenal and Vascular PathologiesTravaux en français237 207