MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4405050026 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-203588

A Novel Three-Way Translocation Involving <i>ETV6-IL3</i> Drives AML with Eosinophilia

2024· article· en· W4405050026 sur OpenAlexfundno aff
Ariel Siegel, Joseph Tripodi, Brianna Kelly, Sebastian Elghaity-Beckley, Michelle Becker, Douglas Tremblay, Jonathan Feld, Hannah Levavi, Marina Kremyanskaya, Bridget K. Marcellino, Christian Salib, Alla Keyzner, Amy S. Duffield, John Mascarenhas, Vesna Najfeld, Alan H. Shih

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueEosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesSilence TherapeuticsOryzon GenomicsSierra OncologyCTI BiopharmaTaiho PharmaceuticalIncyteSwedish Orphan BiovitrumAstellas PharmaAriad PharmaceuticalsMorphoSysCelgeneGilead SciencesAgios PharmaceuticalsBristol-Myers Squibb
Mots-clésChromosomal translocationEosinophiliaMedicineInternal medicineCancer researchPharmacologyBiologyGeneticsGene

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction Eosinophilia is seen in a wide range of disease processes, both reactive and clonal. In AML the presence of eosinophilia often represents underlying gene rearrangements involving CBFB, PDGFR, or ETV6. Identifying the underlying cytogenetic (CG) aberration is informative for prognostication and therapeutic decision-making. Inv(16) AML tends to be chemotherapy sensitive with high remission rates. PDGFR rearrangements may confer sensitivity to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). ETV6 rearrangements involving ABL1 may portend a chemotherapy resistant course. Here, we dissect the molecular mechanisms of an unusual case of AML involving a three-way translocation of ETV6, IL3, and RP11-815J21.3 [t(5;12;15)] that correlated with profound eosinophilia. Methods IL-3, IL-5, and IL-7 levels were measured by a multi-cytokine Luminex panel (Eve Technologies) in the patient's serial plasma and bone marrow (BM) aspirate samples, healthy donor, and non-eosinophilic AML samples. IL3 mRNA expression was assessed by qPCR. Eosinophils were purified using magnetic bead separation and the marker Siglec-8 and were then evaluated for t(5;12;15) by FISH. Clonal evolution was inferred from variant allele and FISH frequencies. Results A 48 year old male presented with fevers and WBC 243k/μL (77% blasts, no eosinophilia). BM biopsy confirmed AML with myelomonocytic differentiation. FISH/CG revealed a NUP98-NSD1 translocation in 91% of cells and NGS revealed FLT3ITD and RUNX1Q397fs*197 mutations. 7+3 and midostaurin were started and the day 21 BM showed residual disease. He was transitioned to azacitidine, venetoclax, and gilteritinib with subsequent remission, loss of FLT3ITD mutation, and undetectable NUP98-NSD1. 7 months after diagnosis he developed profound peripheral blood (PB) eosinophilia, reaching an absolute eosinophil count of 48.2k/μL. BM biopsy showed AML relapse with 19% eosinophils. The NUP98-NSD1 translocation and RUNX1 mutation were now detected, notably, with no FLT3ITD mutation but with a new subclonal three-way translocation, t(5;12;15), detected in 45% of cells, involving IL3, ETV6, and RP11-815J21.3 loci respectively. Over the next 4 months, peak eosinophilia in the BM (52%) corresponded to the highest abundance of t(5;12;15) (57% of cells). When this translocation was later reduced to 2.5% of cells by chemotherapy, the eosinophilia in the BM resolved. Variant allele frequencies suggest that this relapse was driven by the NUP98-NSD1; RUNX1; FLT3ITD mutant clone rather than the IL3-associated clone. At time of initial relapse with eosinophilia, PB plasma and BM aspirate IL-3 levels were significantly elevated (54 pg/mL, 123 pg/mL) compared to normal and non-eosinophilic AML samples (<0.3-1.3 pg/mL). At remission, when eosinophilia had resolved, IL-3 levels declined (8 pg/mL). IL-5, a regulator of eosinophil maturation, was persistently elevated (23-50 pg/mL vs 1-9 pg/mL in normal and other AML) but did not correlate with extent of eosinophilia. IL-7, not involved in eosinophil expansion, showed levels similar to those seen in other AML. Elevated IL3 mRNA expression by qPCR correlated with IL-3 protein levels and degree of PB eosinophilia. To test whether the eosinophils were derived from the mutant clone, eosinophils were purified. The ETV6-IL3 translocation was identified in 39% of these cells. Lastly, the percentage of PB eosinophils was greater than the percentage of interphase PB cells positive for ETV6-IL3 (71% Eos vs 32% FISH+). This suggests both autocrine and paracrine effects from IL-3. Interestingly, we also observed evolution of the AML blasts, possibly secondary to IL-3. At diagnosis, blasts were CD123- (IL-3 Receptor α) but became CD123+ at subsequent relapse, suggesting selection for response to IL-3 signaling. Conclusion Here, we describe a case of a translocation involving the IL3 locus, resulting in elevated IL-3 production with autocrine and paracrine induction of eosinophilia. IL-3 may have also promoted AML relapse and blast evolution. A similar mechanism of translocation induced enhancer proximity can be seen in IL3-IGH B-ALLs with eosinophilia. This ETV6 enhancer specific etiology is important to distinguish from the t(5;12)(q33;p13) PDGFRB-ETV6 rearrangement that induces eosinophilia, is cell intrinsic, and is TKI responsive. AML involving t(5;12;15)(q31;p13;q25) is not TKI responsive, rather more likely responds to chemotherapy.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,007

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,233
Écart entre enseignants0,219 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetEosinophilic Disorders and SyndromesTravaux en français237 207